CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 178Climate variability and modelsClimate Change Communication and PerceptionSustainability and Climate Change Governance

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Unstable climates: Exploring the statistical and social constructions of ‘normal’ climate

Hulme, Mike, Dessai, Suraje, Lorenzoni, Irene, Nelson, Donald R.·2009·Geoforum
DOI 10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.09.010
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.09.010

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Balstad, R., Russell, R., Gill, V., in press. Adaption to an uncertain climate on the Great Plains: testing hypotheses on historical perspectives. In: Adger, N.W., Lorenzoni, I., O’Brien, K. (Eds.), Adapting to Climate Change: Thresholds, Values, Governance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  2. Court, A., 1968. Climatic normals as predictors: Parts I–V. Scientific Report Air Force Cambridge Research Labs, Contract AF19(628)-5176, Bedford, MA, 138pp.
  3. Demeritt, 1991, Climate, cropping and society in Vermont, 1820–1850, Vermont History, 50, 133
  4. IMO, 1937. In: Proceedings of the meetings in Danzig and Warsaw, 29–31 August and 12 September, 1935, Secretariat of the IMO, Leyden.
  5. Pennesi, K., Anderson, D.N., Begum, S.A., Taber, P., Haas, N., Finan, T.J., 2007. Shifting livelihoods and institutional adaptation in Arizona’s high country. Paper Presented at the Conference of the Society for Applied Anthropology, Tampa, Florida, 28–31 March.
  6. Todorov, 1986, Reply to: Quinlan, F.T. (1986), Comments on “Sahel: the changing rainfall regime and the “normals” used for its assessment”, Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology, 25, 258, 10.1175/1520-0450(1986)025<0258:R>2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 178

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Hulme, M., Dessai, S., Lorenzoni, I., & Nelson, D. R.
Affiliations
University of East Anglia (GB)
Corresponding author
Hulme, Mike
ORCID
Venue
Geoforum
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-03
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
197-206
ISSN
0016-7185 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.09.010
OpenAlex
W2087824216
Cited by
176
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 14
FWCI
4.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Geoforum (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Keywords
climate normals, climate change, climate change adaptation, meteorological statistics, climate change projections, climate instability, UK climate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review