CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 85Information and Cyber SecurityE-Government and Public ServicesTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of innovation-supportive culture and organizational citizenship behavior on e-government information system security stemming from mimetic isomorphism

Hwang, Kumju, Choi, Myeonggil·2017·Government Information Quarterly
DOI 10.1016/j.giq.2017.02.001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.giq.2017.02.001

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 151

  1. Ahmed, 1998, Culture and climate for innovation, European Journal of Innovation Management, 1, 30, 10.1108/14601069810199131 · DOI
  2. Alge, 2006, Information privacy in organizations: Empowering creative and extrarole performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 221, 10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.221 · DOI
  3. Almarabeh, 2010, A general framework for e-government: Definition maturity challenges, opportunities, and success, European Journal of Scientific Research, 39, 29
  4. Andersen, 2009, E-Government as an anti-corruption strategy, Information Economics and Policy, 21, 201, 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2008.11.003 · DOI
  5. Anderson, 2010, Practicing safe computing: A multimethod empirical examination of home computer user security behavioral intentions, MIS Quarterly, 34, 613, 10.2307/25750694 · DOI
  6. Ashworth, 2009, Escape from the iron cage? Organizational change and isomorphic pressures in the public sector, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19, 165, 10.1093/jopart/mum038 · DOI
  7. Baldersheim, 2008, Innovation in E-government: Analysis of municipal web pages in the Nordic countries, Information Polity, 13, 125, 10.3233/IP-2008-0133 · DOI
  8. Baron, 1986, The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychology research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173, 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Barreto, 2006, To conform or to perform? Mimetic behaviour, legitimacy-based groups and performance consequences, Journal of Management Studies, 43, 1559, 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00620.x · DOI
  10. Bateman, 1983, Job satisfaction and the good soldier: the relationship between affect and employee “Citizenship”, Academy of Management Journal, 26, 587, 10.2307/255908 · DOI
  11. Ben, 2014, E-Government innovations and work transformations: Implications of the introduction of electronic tools in public government organizations, International Journal of Electronic Government Research (IJEGR), 10, 1, 10.4018/ijegr.2014010101 · DOI
  12. Bertot, 2010, Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies, Government Information Quarterly, 27, 264, 10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Boss, 2009, If someone is watching, I'll do what I'm asked: Mandatoriness, control, and information security, European Journal of Information Systems, 18, 151, 10.1057/ejis.2009.8 · DOI
  14. Boyer-Wright, 2015, E-Government and related indices: Telecommunications infrastructure, human capital, institutional efficacy, and online services, International Journal of Electronic Government Research (IJEGR), 11, 24, 10.4018/IJEGR.2015100102 · DOI
  15. Bulgurcu, 2010, Information security policy compliance: An empirical study of rationality-based beliefs and information security awareness, MIS Quarterly, 34, 523, 10.2307/25750690 · DOI
  16. Burns, 1993, Adoption and abandonment of matrix management programs: Effects of organizational characteristics and interorganizational networks, Academy of Management Journal, 36, 106, 10.2307/256514 · DOI
  17. Carter, 2008, E-government adoption: A cultural comparison, Information Systems Frontiers, 10, 473, 10.1007/s10796-008-9103-6 · DOI
  18. Chin, 2003, A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study, Information Systems Research, 14, 189, 10.1287/isre.14.2.189.16018 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Choi, 2016, Leadership of information security manager on the effectiveness of information systems security for secure sustainable computing, Sustainability, 8, 1, 10.3390/su8070638 · DOI
  20. Choi, 2015, A study on neutralization and organizational citizenship behavior for information security policy compliance, Information Systems Review, 17, 65, 10.14329/isr.2015.17.3.065 · DOI
  21. Cordella, 2015, E-Government and organizational change: Reappraising the role of ICT and bureaucracy in public service delivery, Government Information Quarterly, 32, 279, 10.1016/j.giq.2015.03.005 · DOI
  22. Coursey, 2008, Models of e-government: Are they correct? An empirical assessment, Public Administration Review, 68, 523, 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00888.x · DOI
  23. Coyle-Shapiro, 2002, A psychological contract perspective on organizational citizenship behavior, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 927, 10.1002/job.173 · DOI
  24. Currie, 2012, Institutional isomorphism and change: The national programme for IT–10years on, Journal of Information Technology, 27, 236, 10.1057/jit.2012.18 · DOI
  25. Currie, 2009, Special issue on institutional theory in information systems research: Contextualizing the IT artefact, Journal of Information Technology, 24, 283, 10.1057/jit.2009.17 · DOI
  26. Daou, 2013, E-Government in outlying regions: A manager's perspective, Information Polity, 18, 157, 10.3233/IP-130301 · DOI
  27. D'Arcy, 2011, A review and analysis of deterrence theory in the IS security literature: Making sense of the disparate findings, European Journal of Information Systems, 20, 643, 10.1057/ejis.2011.23 · DOI
  28. Dhillon, 2001, Current directions in IS security research: Towards socio-organizational perspectives, Information Systems Journal, 11, 127, 10.1046/j.1365-2575.2001.00099.x · DOI
  29. Dimaggio, 1983, The iron cage revisited - institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields, American Sociological Review, 48, 147, 10.2307/2095101 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Doherty, 2006, Aligning the information security policy with the strategic information systems plan, Computers & Security, 25, 55, 10.1016/j.cose.2005.09.009 · DOI
  31. Dougherty, 1996, Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: Overcoming innovation-to-organization problems, Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1120, 10.2307/256994 · DOI
  32. Dowling, 1975, Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior, The Pacific Sociological Review, 18, 122, 10.2307/1388226 · DOI
  33. Dwivedi, 2012, A conceptual model for examining E-government adoption in Jordan, International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 8, 1, 10.4018/jegr.2012040101 · DOI
  34. Dyne, 1998, Helping and voicing extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity, Academy of Management Journal, 41, 108, 10.2307/256902 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Ehrhart, 2004, Organizational citizenship behavior in work groups: A group norms approach, Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 960, 10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.960 · DOI
  36. Eom, 2012, Institutional dimensions of e-government development: Implementing the business reference model in the United States and Korea, Administration and Society, 45, 875, 10.1177/0095399712445870 · DOI
  37. Erez, 2004, A dynamic, multi-level model of culture: From the micro level of the individual to the macro level of a global culture, Applied Psychology, 53, 583, 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2004.00190.x · DOI
  38. Erkutlu, 2011, The moderating role of organizational culture in the relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors, Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 32, 532, 10.1108/01437731111161058 · DOI
  39. Feng, 2014, A security risk analysis model for information systems: Causal relationships of risk factors and vulnerability propagation analysis, Information Sciences, 256, 57, 10.1016/j.ins.2013.02.036 · DOI
  40. Fields, 1983, The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields, American Sociological Review, 48, 147, 10.2307/2095101 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Flanagin, 2000, Social pressures on organizational website adoption, Human Communication Research, 26, 618, 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00771.x · DOI
  42. Fornell, 1981, Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39, 10.2307/3151312 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Franke, 2015, Influential factors for E-government success in the Middle East: Case study evidence from Saudi Arabia, International Journal of Electronic Government Research (IJEGR), 11, 39, 10.4018/IJEGR.2015010103 · DOI
  44. Frumkin, 2004, Institutional isomorphism and public sector organizations, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14, 283, 10.1093/jopart/muh028 · DOI
  45. Gefen, 2000, Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4, 2, 10.17705/1CAIS.00407 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Gil-García, 2005, E-Government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations, Government Information Quarterly, 22, 187, 10.1016/j.giq.2005.02.001 · DOI
  47. Gil-Garcia, 2009, Government information sharing and integration: Combining the social and the technical, Information Polity, 14, 1, 10.3233/IP-2009-0176 · DOI
  48. Gil-Garcia, 2014, Being smart: Emerging technologies and innovation in the public sector, Government Information Quarterly, 31, I1, 10.1016/j.giq.2014.09.001 · DOI
  49. Greve, 2000, Innovations as catalysts for organizational change: Shifts in organizational cognition and search, Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 54, 10.2307/2666979 · DOI
  50. Hagen, 2008, Implementation and effectiveness of organizational information security measures, Information Management & Security, 16, 377, 10.1108/09685220810908796 · DOI
  51. Hajer, 2005, Setting the stage - A dramaturgy of policy deliberation, Administration and Society, 36, 624, 10.1177/0095399704270586 · DOI
  52. Halcnin, 2004, Electronic government: Government capability and terrorist resources, Government Information Quarterly, 21, 406, 10.1016/j.giq.2004.08.002 · DOI
  53. Hartmann, 2006, The role of organizational culture in motivating innovative behaviour in construction firms, Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management, 6, 159, 10.1108/14714170610710712 · DOI
  54. Haveman, 1993, Follow the leader - mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets, Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 593, 10.2307/2393338 · DOI
  55. Heeks, 2007, Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice, Government Information Quarterly, 24, 243, 10.1016/j.giq.2006.06.005 · DOI
  56. Herath, 2009, Encouraging information security behaviors in organizations: Role of penalties, pressures and perceived effectiveness, Decision Support Systems, 47, 154, 10.1016/j.dss.2009.02.005 · DOI
  57. Heskett, 1992, Corporate culture and performance, Bus. Rev., 2, 83
  58. Heugens, 2009, Structure! Agency! (and other quarrels): A meta-analysis of institutional theories of organization, Academy of Management Journal, 52, 61, 10.5465/AMJ.2009.36461835 · DOI
  59. Hewett, 2002, An exploration of the moderating role of buyer corporate culture in industrial buyer-seller relationships, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30, 229, 10.1177/0092070302303004 · DOI
  60. Higgins, 2002, Want innovation? Then use cultural artifacts that support it, Organizational Dynamics, 31, 74, 10.1016/S0090-2616(02)00073-6 · DOI
  61. Hill, 1995, Information security: An overview and resource guide for information managers, Records Management Quarterly, 29, 14
  62. Hofstede, 1990, Measuring organizational cultures: A qualitative and quantitative study across twenty cases, Administrative Science Quarterly, 286, 10.2307/2393392 · DOI
  63. Hone, 2002, Information security policy – What do international security standards say?, Computers & Security, 21, 402, 10.1016/S0167-4048(02)00504-7 · DOI
  64. Hovav, 2012, Applying an extended model of deterrence across cultures: An investigation of information systems misuse in the U.S. and South Korea, Information Management, 49, 99, 10.1016/j.im.2011.12.005 · DOI
  65. Hsu, 2009, Frame misalignment: Interpreting the implementation of information systems security certification in an organization, European Journal of Information Systems, 18, 140, 10.1057/ejis.2009.7 · DOI
  66. Hsu, 2012, Institutional influences on information systems security innovations, Information Systems Research, 23, 918, 10.1287/isre.1110.0393 · DOI
  67. Hsu, 2015, The role of extra-role behaviors and social controls in information security policy effectiveness, Information Systems Research, 26, 282, 10.1287/isre.2015.0569 · DOI
  68. Hu, 2006, The institutionalization of IT budgeting: Empirical evidence from the financial sector, Information Resources Management Journal, 19, 84, 10.4018/irmj.2006010105 · DOI
  69. Hu, 2007, The role of external and internal influences on information systems security–a neoinstitutional perspective, The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 16, 153, 10.1016/j.jsis.2007.05.004 · DOI
  70. Huang, 2014, Usability and credibility of e-government websites, Government Information Quarterly, 31, 584, 10.1016/j.giq.2014.07.002 · DOI
  71. Ifinedo, 2014, Information systems security policy compliance: An empirical study of the effects of socialisation, influence, and cognition, Information Management, 51, 69, 10.1016/j.im.2013.10.001 · DOI
  72. Irani, 2007, e-Government: Past, present and future, European Journal of Information Systems, 16, 103, 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000678 · DOI
  73. Jassawalla, 2002, Cultures that support product-innovation processes, The Academy of Management Executive, 16, 42, 10.5465/AME.2002.8540307 · DOI
  74. Joseph, 2013, Vol. 27
  75. Joseph, 2013, A structured analysis of e-government studies: Trends and opportunities, Government Information Quarterly, 30, 435, 10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.006 · DOI
  76. Jun, 2010, Institutional motivations in the adoption of innovations: The case of e-government, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, 495, 10.1093/jopart/muq020 · DOI
  77. Kaganer, 2010, Building legitimacy for IT innovations: The case of computerized physician order entry systems, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 11, 1, 10.17705/1jais.00219 · DOI
  78. Kankanhalli, 2003, An integrative study of information systems security effectiveness, International Journal of Information Management, 23, 139, 10.1016/S0268-4012(02)00105-6 · DOI
  79. Karlsen, 2005, What characterizes successful IT projects, International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, 4, 525, 10.1142/S0219622005001738 · DOI
  80. Karyda, 2005, Information systems security policies: A contextual perspective, Computers & Security, 24, 246, 10.1016/j.cose.2004.08.011 · DOI
  81. Khalil, 2011, E-Government readiness: Does national culture matter?, Government Information Quarterly, 28, 388, 10.1016/j.giq.2010.06.011 · DOI
  82. Khazanchi, 2007, Innovation-supportive culture: The impact of organizational values on process innovation, Journal of Operations Management, 25, 871, 10.1016/j.jom.2006.08.003 · DOI
  83. Kim, 2009, An institutional analysis of an e-government system for anti-corruption: The case of OPEN, Government Information Quarterly, 26, 42, 10.1016/j.giq.2008.09.002 · DOI
  84. Knapp, 2007, Information security effectiveness: Conceptualization and validation of a theory, International Journal of Information Security and Privacy, 1, 37, 10.4018/jisp.2007040103 · DOI
  85. Kondra, 2009, Institutional processes of organizational culture, Culture and Organization, 15, 39, 10.1080/14759550802709541 · DOI
  86. Larsson, 2016, Sustainable eGovernance? Practices, problems and beliefs about the future in Swedish eGov practice, Government Information Quarterly, 33, 105, 10.1016/j.giq.2015.11.002 · DOI
  87. Lau, 2002, Institutional forces and organizational culture in China: Effects on change schemas, firm commitment and job satisfaction, Journal of International Business Studies, 533, 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8491030 · DOI
  88. Lawton, 2000, Developments: Coping with ambiguity: Reconciling external legitimacy and organizational implementation in performance measurement, Public Money and Management, 20, 13, 10.1111/1467-9302.00218 · DOI
  89. Lee, 2011, The effects of corporate social responsibility, Korean Management Review, 40, 919
  90. Leidner, 2006, Review: A review of culture in information systems research: Toward a theory of information technology culture conflict, MIS Quarterly, 30, 357, 10.2307/25148735 · DOI
  91. LePine, 2002, The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review and meta-analysis, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 52, 10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.52 · DOI
  92. Lewis, 2002, Product development tensions: Exploring contrasting styles of project management, Academy of Management Journal, 45, 546, 10.2307/3069380 · DOI
  93. Liu, 2010, The role of institutional pressures and organizational culture in the firm's intention to adopt internet-enabled supply chain management systems, Journal of Operations Management, 28, 372, 10.1016/j.jom.2009.11.010 · DOI
  94. Lodge, 2005, Control over government: Institutional isomorphism and governance dynamics in German public administration, Policy Studies Journal, 33, 213, 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2005.00103.x · DOI
  95. Luna-Reyes, 2011, Using institutional theory and dynamic simulation to understand complex e-government phenomena, Government Information Quarterly, 28, 329, 10.1016/j.giq.2010.08.007 · DOI
  96. Luna-Reyes, 2005, Information systems development as emergent socio-technical change: A practice approach, European Journal of Information Systems, 14, 93, 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000524 · DOI
  97. Luna-Reyes, 2013, Key factors and processes for digital government success, Information Polity, 18, 101, 10.3233/IP-130307 · DOI
  98. Markus, 2004, Technochange management: Using IT to drive organizational change, Journal of Information Technology, 19, 4, 10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000002 · DOI
  99. McNeely, 1994, The role of dispositional and situational antecedents in prosocial organizational behavior: An examination of intended beneficiaries of prosocial behavior, Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 836, 10.1037/0021-9010.79.6.836 · DOI
  100. Naranjo-Valencia, 2011, Innovation or imitation? The role of organizational culture, Management Decision, 49, 55, 10.1108/00251741111094437 · DOI
  101. Nutley, 2000, Getting research into practice: Making a reality of evidence-based practice: Some lessons from the diffusion of innovations, Public Money & Management, 20, 35, 10.1111/1467-9302.00234 · DOI
  102. Organ, 1997, Organizational citizenship behavior: It's construct clean-up time, Human Performance, 10, 85, 10.1207/s15327043hup1002_2 · DOI
  103. Orlikowski, 2001, Technology and institutions: What can research on information technology and research on organizations learn from each other?, MIS Quarterly, 25, 145, 10.2307/3250927 · DOI
  104. Paquette, 2010, Identifying the security risks associated with governmental use of cloud computing, Government Information Quarterly, 27, 245, 10.1016/j.giq.2010.01.002 · DOI
  105. Pedersen, 2006, In search of identity and legitimation bridging organizational culture and neoinstitutionalism, American Behavioral Scientist, 49, 897, 10.1177/0002764205284798 · DOI
  106. Podsakoff, 1994, Organizational citizenship behaviors and sales unit effectiveness, Journal of Marketing Research, 31, 351, 10.2307/3152222 · DOI
  107. Posey, 2013, Insiders' protection of organizational information assets: Development of a systematics-based taxonomy and theory of diversity for protection-motivated behaviors, MIS Quarterly, 37, 1189, 10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.4.09 · DOI
  108. Posthumus, 2004, A framework for the governance of information security, Computers & Security, 23, 638, 10.1016/j.cose.2004.10.006 · DOI
  109. Quinn, 1983, A spatial model of effectiveness criteria - Towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis, Management Science, 29, 363, 10.1287/mnsc.29.3.363 · DOI
  110. Rao, 1994, The social construction of reputation: Certification contests, legitimation, and the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry: 1895–1912, Strategic Management Journal, 15, 29, 10.1002/smj.4250150904 · DOI
  111. Riolli-Saltzman, 2001, After the bubble burst: How small high-tech firms can keep in front of the wave, The Academy of Management Executive, 15, 114, 10.5465/AME.2001.5229655 · DOI
  112. Rodrigues, 2006, The political dynamics of organizational culture in an institutionalized environment, Organization Studies, 27, 537, 10.1177/0170840605059454 · DOI
  113. Ryu, 2013, 17(4), 769
  114. Sá, 2016, Potential dimensions for a local e-government services quality model, Telematics and Informatics, 33, 270, 10.1016/j.tele.2015.08.005 · DOI
  115. Savoldelli, 2014, Understanding the e-government paradox: Learning from literature and practice on barriers to adoption, Government Information Quarterly, 31, S63, 10.1016/j.giq.2014.01.008 · DOI
  116. Smith, 1983, Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents, Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 653, 10.1037/0021-9010.68.4.653 · DOI
  117. Snead, 2014, E-Government research in the United States, Government Information Quarterly, 31, 129, 10.1016/j.giq.2013.07.005 · DOI
  118. Song, 2005, A comparative study on the information security strategy of Korean E-government with defense-in-depth strategy of DoD, The KIPS Transactions: Part C, 12, 659, 10.3745/KIPSTC.2005.12C.5.659 · DOI
  119. Stanton, 2005, Analysis of end user security behaviors, Computers & Security, 24, 124, 10.1016/j.cose.2004.07.001 · DOI
  120. Straub, 1990, Effective IS security: An empirical study, Information Systems Research, 1, 255, 10.1287/isre.1.3.255 · DOI
  121. Suchman, 1995, Managing legitimacy - strategic and institutional approaches, Academy of Management Review, 20, 571, 10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331 · DOI · Paper page
  122. Sun, 2015, An implementation framework for E-government 2.0, Telematics and Informatics, 32, 504, 10.1016/j.tele.2014.12.003 · DOI
  123. Thomson, 2006, Towards an information security competence maturity model, Computer Fraud & Security, 2006, 11, 10.1016/S1361-3723(06)70356-6 · DOI
  124. Tingling, 2002, Mimetic isomorphism and technology evaluation: Does imitation transcend judgment?, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 3, 5, 10.17705/1jais.00025 · DOI · Paper page
  125. Tinoco, 2013, The transfer of military culture to private sector organizations: A sense of duty emerges, Journal of Organizational Culture, Communication and Conflict, 17, 37
  126. Tolbert, 1983, Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, Administrative Science Quarterly, 1880-1935, 22, 10.2307/2392383 · DOI
  127. Tolbert, 2008, Institutions, policy innovation, and e-government in the American states, Public Administration Review, 68, 549, 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00890.x · DOI
  128. Tost, 2011, An integrative model of legitimacy judgments, Academy of Management Review, 36, 686
  129. Tsai, 2009, Improving the process of e-government initiative: An in-depth case study of web-based GIS implementation, Government Information Quarterly, 26, 368, 10.1016/j.giq.2008.11.007 · DOI
  130. Tyworth, 2014, Organizational identity and information systems: How organizational ICT reflects who an organization is, European Journal of Information Systems, 23, 69, 10.1057/ejis.2013.32 · DOI
  131. Uher, 1999, Risk management in the conceptual phase of a project, International Journal of Project Management, 17, 161, 10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00024-6 · DOI
  132. Vandenabeele, 2007, Toward a public administration theory of public service motivation: An institutional approach, Public Management Review, 9, 545, 10.1080/14719030701726697 · DOI
  133. Vroom, 2004, Towards information security behavioural compliance, Computers & Security, 23, 191, 10.1016/j.cose.2004.01.012 · DOI
  134. Walz, 2000, Organizational citizenship behaviors: Their relationship to organizational effectiveness, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research, 24, 301, 10.1177/109634800002400301 · DOI
  135. Weiling, 2008, Organizational culture and leadership in ERP implementation, Decision Support Systems, 45, 208, 10.1016/j.dss.2007.02.002 · DOI
  136. Westphal, 1997, Customization or conformity? An institutional and network perspective on the content and consequences of TQM adoption, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 366, 10.2307/2393924 · DOI
  137. William, 1991, Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors, Journal of Management, 17, 601, 10.1177/014920639101700305 · DOI
  138. Willison, 2013, Beyond deternce: an expanded view of employee computer abuse, MIS Quarterly, 37, 1, 10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.1.01 · DOI
  139. Woodward, 1996, Organizational legitimacy and stakeholder information provision, British Journal of Management, 7, 329, 10.1111/j.1467-8551.1996.tb00123.x · DOI
  140. Wu, 2014, Protecting personal data in e-government: A cross-country study, Government Information Quarterly, 31, 150, 10.1016/j.giq.2013.07.003 · DOI
  141. Yen, 2008, Do organizational citizenship behaviors lead to information system success? Testing the mediation effects of integration climate and project management, Information Management, 45, 394, 10.1016/j.im.2008.04.004 · DOI
  142. Yildiz, 2007, E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward, Government Information Quarterly, 24, 646, 10.1016/j.giq.2007.01.002 · DOI
  143. Yıldız, 2012, Big questions of e-government research, Information Polity, 17, 343, 10.3233/IP-2012-000284 · DOI
  144. Yoon, 2009, The effects of organizational citizenship behaviors on ERP system success, Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 421, 10.1016/j.chb.2008.10.004 · DOI
  145. Yoon, 2000, Supervisor support in the work place: Legitimacy and positive affectivity, The Journal of Social Psychology, 140, 295, 10.1080/00224540009600472 · DOI
  146. Zaidi, 2012, Assessing e-government service delivery (government to citizen), International Journal of eBussiness and eGovernment Studies, 4, 45
  147. Zammuto, 1992, Gaining advanced manufacturing technologies benefits - The roles of organization design and culture, Academy of Management Review, 17, 701, 10.5465/amr.1992.4279062 · DOI
  148. Zhang, 2014, Diffusion of e-government: A literature review and directions for future directions, Government Information Quarterly, 31, 631, 10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.013 · DOI
  149. Zhao, 2010, Opportunities and threats: A security assessment of state e-government website, Government Information Quarterly, 27, 49, 10.1016/j.giq.2009.07.004 · DOI
  150. Zheng, 2013, E-government adoption in public administration organizations: Integrating institutional theory perspective and resource-based view, European Journal of Information Systems, 22, 221, 10.1057/ejis.2012.28 · DOI
  151. Zsidisin, 2005, An institutional theory perspective of business continuity planning for purchasing and supply management, International Journal of Production Research, 43, 3401, 10.1080/00207540500095613 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 85

Metadata

Authors
Hwang, K., & Choi, M.
Affiliations
Chung-Ang University (KR)
Corresponding author
Choi, Myeonggil
ORCID
Venue
Government Information Quarterly
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-04
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
183-198
ISSN
0740-624X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.giq.2017.02.001
OpenAlex
W2586547739
Cited by
85
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
FWCI
10.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Government Information Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Keywords
organizational citizenship behavior, mimetic isomorphism, institutional theory, legitimacy, organizational cynicism, information system effectiveness, public sector employees, South Korean government

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review