Cited by 487Climate change impacts on agricultureEconomics of Agriculture and Food MarketsClimate Change Policy and Economics

The poverty implications of climate-induced crop yield changes by 2030

Open access
Hertel, Thomas W., Burke, Marshall B., Lobell, David B.·2010·Global Environmental Change

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.001

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Dimaranan, B. V. (Ed.) (2006) Global Trade Assistance and Protection: The GTAP 6 Data Base West Lafayette, Indiana, Centre for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue University.
  2. Hertel, T. W. (Ed.) (1997) Global trade analysis: models and applications, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge Univ Press.
  3. Lobell, D. B. & Field, C. B. (2007) Global scale climate-crop yield relationships and the impacts of recent warming. Environmental Research Letters, 2, 004000 (7pp).
  4. Tebaldi, C. & Lobell, D. B. (2008) Towards probabilistic projections of climate change impacts on global crop yields. Geophysical Research Letters, 35, L08705, doi:10.1029/2008GL033423. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hertel, T. W., Burke, M. B., & Lobell, D. B.
Affiliations
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Lobell, David B.
Venue
Global Environmental Change
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-10
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
577-585
ISSN
0959-3780 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1997952470
Cited by
487
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 21
FWCI
24.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Global Environmental Change (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
Funders
  • Rockefeller Foundation
  • World Bank Group
  • European Commission
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Climate change impacts on agriculture
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
Keywords
climate change impacts on agriculture, crop yield changes, poverty, food prices, commodity prices, economic welfare, developing countries, household income distribution, climate shocks, food security

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review