Cited by 297Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactEconomics of Agriculture and Food MarketsAgricultural and Food Production Studies

Global Food Demand Scenarios for the 21st Century

Open access
Bodirsky, Benjamin Leon, Rolinski, Susanne, Biewald, Anne, Weindl, Isabelle, Popp, Alexander, Lotze-Campen, Hermann·2015·PLOS ONE

Abstract

Long-term food demand scenarios are an important tool for studying global food security and for analysing the environmental impacts of agriculture. We provide a simple and transparent method to create scenarios for future plant-based and animal-based calorie demand, using time-dependent regression models between calorie demand and income. The scenarios can be customized to a specific storyline by using different input data for gross domestic product (GDP) and population projections and by assuming different functional forms of the regressions. Our results confirm that total calorie demand increases with income, but we also found a non-income related positive time-trend. The share of animal-based calories is estimated to rise strongly with income for low-income groups. For high income groups, two ambiguous relations between income and the share of animal-based products are consistent with historical data: First, a positive relation with a strong negative time-trend and second a negative relation with a slight negative time-trend. The fits of our regressions are highly significant and our results compare well to other food demand estimates. The method is exemplarily used to construct four food demand scenarios until the year 2100 based on the storylines of the IPCC Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (SRES). We find in all scenarios a strong increase of global food demand until 2050 with an increasing share of animal-based products, especially in developing countries.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0139201

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [4]Smil V. Feeding the World: A Challenge for the 21st century. The MIT Press; 2000. ISBN 9780262692717.
  2. [7]Nord M, Andrews M. Household Food Security in the United States, 2003. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network; 2003 ID 631912. Available from: http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=631912.
  3. [26]Leggett J, Pepper WJ, Swart RJ, Edmonds J, Meira Filho LG, Mintzer I, et al Emissions scenarios for the IPCC: an update. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA; 1992.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bodirsky, B. L., Rolinski, S., Biewald, A., Weindl, I., Popp, A., & Lotze-Campen, H.
Affiliations
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
  • Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (DE)
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
Corresponding author
Rolinski, Susanne
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2015-11-04
Volume
10
Issue
11
Pages
e0139201
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1909223586
Cited by
297
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
15.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RENATE (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RENATE (cc-by)
Funders
  • European Commission (265104, 226701, 243888)
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01LL0901A, 031A103B, 01LL0904B)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural and Food Production Studies
Keywords
global food demand, animal-based food consumption, plant-based food consumption, food security, population projections, GDP projections, developing countries
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Animals, Child, Eating, Food Supply, Humans, Income, Models, Theoretical, Regression Analysis, Databases, Factual, Child Mortality, History, 21st Century

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review