The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Do people “personally experience” global warming, and if so how, and does it matter?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences.
Zajonc, R. B. (1980) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.35.2.151 · Cited by 8,094
Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data
Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007) · Communication Methods and Measures · doi:10.1080/19312450709336664 · Cited by 4,225 · cited 1×
“A Krippendorff’s a inter-reliability statistic (Hayes and Krippendorff, 2007) of .800 or above was obtained for 27 variables, and above .700 for one variable (precipitation specifics).”
MethodIntegration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious
Epstein, S. (1994) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.49.8.709 · Cited by 2,883 · cited 2×
“…heritage with other species; it automatically and swiftly processes environmental stimuli (Weber et al., 2004) and is variously described as experiential, intuitive, automatic, natural, nonverbal, narrative, associative, or System 1 (Epstein, 1994; Kahneman, 2011; Stanovich and West, 2000).”
BackgroundCultural cognition of scientific consensus.
Kahan, D. M., Jenkins‐Smith, H., & Braman, D. (2011) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2010.511246 · Cited by 1,686
Public understanding of climate change in the United States.
Weber, E. U., & Stern, P. C. (2011) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0023253 · Cited by 841
A widening gap: republican and democratic views on climate change.
Dunlap, R. E., & McCright, A. M. (2008) · Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.3200/envt.50.5.26-35 · Cited by 780
Cited by
How to SHIFT Consumer Behaviors to be More Sustainable: A Literature Review and Guiding Framework
White, K., Habib, R., & Hardisty, D. J. (2019) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/0022242919825649 · Cited by 2,386
The Future is Now: Reducing Psychological Distance to Increase Public Engagement with Climate Change
Jones, C., Hine, D. W., & Marks, A. D. G. (2017) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.12601 · Cited by 507
Extreme weather events and climate change concern
Konisky, D. M., Hughes, L., & Kaylor, C. H. (2016) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-015-1555-3 · Cited by 367
Differentiating environmental concern in the context of psychological adaption to climate change
Helm, S. V., Pollitt, A., Barnett, M. A., Curran, M. A., & Craig, Z. R. (2018) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.11.012 · Cited by 307
van der Linden, S. (2014) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2008 · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- Akerlof, K., Maibach, E. W., Fitzgerald, D., Cedeno, A. Y., & Neuman, A.
- Venue
- Global Environmental Change
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-02
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 81-91
- ISSN
- 0959-3780 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1992178493
- Cited by
- 587
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 87.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Do people “personally experience” global warming, and if so how, and does it matter? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.07.006
- The paper
- Akerlof, K., Maibach, E. W., Fitzgerald, D., Cedeno, A. Y., & Neuman, A. (2013). Do people “personally experience” global warming, and if so how, and does it matter? Global Environmental Change. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.07.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
