The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.
Meeting global land restoration and protection targets: What would the world look like in 2050?
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“However, increasing forest areas also led to the contraction and further intensification of cropland and pastureland, in some scenarios causing negative impacts on many carbon and biodiversity hotspots in the Americas, India, and Indonesia due to land-use displacement (Section 4.2).”
From Restoring Degraded Lands (2021) · cites this paper as [130]
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“They found that meeting these targets would require an increase in global tree cover of 4 million km² that would increase forest carbon stocks by 50 Gt and protect 28% of the terrestrial surface with high biodiversity and carbon values.”
From Restoring Degraded Lands (2021) · cites this paper as [130]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas
Hijmans, R. J., Cameron, S. E., Parra, J. L., Jones, P. G., & Jarvis, A. (2005) · International Journal of Climatology · doi:10.1002/joc.1276 · Cited by 19,860
Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development
Desa, U. (2018) · Springer Publishing Company eBooks · doi:10.1891/9780826190123.ap02 · Cited by 19,478
Global Consequences of Land Use
Foley, J. A., DeFries, R., Asner, G. P., Barford, C., Bonan, G., Carpenter, S. R., Chapin, F. S., Coe, M. T., Daily, G. C., Gibbs, H. K., et al. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1111772 · Cited by 13,272
Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet
Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S. E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., Biggs, R., Carpenter, S. R., de Vries, W., de Wit, C. A., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1259855 · Cited by 12,527
Food Security: The Challenge of Feeding 9 Billion People
Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, I. R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F., Pretty, J., Robinson, S., Thomas, S. M., & Toulmin, C. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1185383 · Cited by 11,943
Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development
(2022) · doi:10.5040/9781509934058.0025 · Cited by 6,750
Riahi, K., van Vuuren, D. P., Kriegler, E., Edmonds, J., O’Neill, B. C., Fujimori, S., Bauer, N., Calvin, K., Dellink, R., Fricko, O., et al. (2017) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009 · Cited by 6,607
Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity—Ecosystem service management
Tscharntke, T., Klein, A. M., Kruess, A., Steffan‐Dewenter, I., & Thies, C. (2005) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00782.x · Cited by 4,455
O’Neill, B. C., Kriegler, E., Ebi, K. L., Kemp-Benedict, E., Riahi, K., Rothman, D. S., van Ruijven, B. J., van Vuuren, D. P., Birkmann, J., Kok, K., et al. (2017) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.01.004 · Cited by 3,359
Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies
Power, A. G. (2010) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0143 · Cited by 2,334
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Combatting global grassland degradation
Bardgett, R. D., Bullock, J. M., Lavorel, S., Manning, P., Schaffner, U., Ostle, N., Chomel, M., Durigan, G., Fry, E. L., Johnson, D., et al. (2021) · Nature Reviews Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43017-021-00207-2 · Cited by 1,551
Smith, P., Calvin, K., Nkem, J., Campbell, D., Cherubini, F., Grassi, G., Korotkov, V., Le Hoang, A., Lwasa, S., McElwee, P., et al. (2020) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.14878 · Cited by 422
“…Keenan et al. (2015), Núñez et al. (2010) Reforestation and forest restoration >3 Mkm2 suitable for restoration Medium confidence UNCCD (2013), Wolff et al. (2018), Bastin et al. (2019) Afforestation up to 25.8 Mkm2 by the end of the century Low confidence Griscom et al. (2017),…”
BackgroundInfluentialLand Use and Ecological Change: A 12,000-Year History
Ellis, E. C. (2021) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-010822 · Cited by 274
“Although climate change is coming to dominate the processes of global environmental change as it continues to accelerate, interactions between land use and climate change, and the role of land use as both a driver of and a solution to climate change, are becoming even more important (12, 125).”
BackgroundBeyond land cover change: towards a new generation of land use models
Verburg, P. H., Alexander, P. M., Evans, T. P., Magliocca, N. R., Malek, Ž., Rounsevell, M., & van Vliet, J. (2019) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2019.05.002 · Cited by 213
Self-citationGupta, J., Bai, X., Liverman, D. M., Rockström, J., Qin, D., Stewart-Koster, B., Rocha, J. C., Jacobson, L., Abrams, J. F., Andersen, L. S., et al. (2024) · The Lancet Planetary Health · doi:10.1016/s2542-5196(24)00042-1 · Cited by 197
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wolff, S., Schrammeijer, E. A., Schulp, C. J. E., & Verburg, P. H.
- Affiliations
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Wolff, Sarah
- Venue
- Global Environmental Change
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-09
- Volume
- 52
- Pages
- 259-272
- ISSN
- 0959-3780 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2888961749
- Cited by
- 130
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 15
- FWCI
- 6.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Global Environmental Change (publishedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- DORA WSL (Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- European Research Council (311819)
- European Commission (603416, LUC4C, 308393)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Social Sciences › Development › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Keywords
- land restoration, land system change, land cover change, tree cover, forest carbon stocks, cropland expansion, cropland intensification, biodiversity hotspots, carbon storage, Sustainable Development Goals, Convention on Biological Diversity, UNCCD, Shared Socioeconomic Pathways, food production demand, land use policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
