The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Imperialist appropriation in the world economy: Drain from the global South through unequal exchange, 1990–2015
Open accessAbstract
Unequal exchange theory posits that economic growth in the “advanced economies” of the global North relies on a large net appropriation of resources and labour from the global South, extracted through price differentials in international trade. Past attempts to estimate the scale and value of this drain have faced a number of conceptual and empirical limitations, and have been unable to capture the upstream resources and labour embodied in traded goods. Here we use environmental input-output data and footprint analysis to quantify the physical scale of net appropriation from the South in terms of embodied resources and labour over the period 1990 to 2015. We then represent the value of appropriated resources in terms of prevailing market prices. Our results show that in 2015 the North net appropriated from the South 12 billion tons of embodied raw material equivalents, 822 million hectares of embodied land, 21 exajoules of embodied energy, and 188 million person-years of embodied labour, worth $10.8 trillion in Northern prices – enough to end extreme poverty 70 times over. Over the whole period, drain from the South totalled $242 trillion (constant 2010 USD). This drain represents a significant windfall for the global North, equivalent to a quarter of Northern GDP. For comparison, we also report drain in global average prices. Using this method, we find that the South’s losses due to unequal exchange outstrip their total aid receipts over the period by a factor of 30. Our analysis confirms that unequal exchange is a significant driver of global inequality, uneven development, and ecological breakdown.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers
Poore, J., & Nemecek, T. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaq0216 · Cited by 6,085
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012) · ASEAN ECONOMIC BULLETIN · doi:10.1355/ae29-2j · Cited by 5,568
Input-output analysis foundations and extensions
Miller, R. E., & Blair, P. D. (2009) · Cited by 5,083
The economic development of Latin America and its principal problems
Prebisch, R. (1950) · DIGITAL REPOSITORY Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (United Nations) · Cited by 3,337
The bottom billion: why the poorest countries are failing and what can be done about it
(2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-2714 · Cited by 3,033
How Europe Underdeveloped Africa
Gerhart, G. M., & Rodney, W. (1997) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20048265 · Cited by 2,530
Capitalism in the Web of Life: Ecology and the Accumulation of Capital
Boscov-Ellen, D., & Graduate Faculty Philosophy Department, N. S. F. S. R. (2016) · Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal · doi:10.5840/gfpj201637226 · Cited by 2,450
Neo-Colonialism. The Last Stage of Imperialism
Tiger, L., & Nkrumah, K. (1966) · International Journal · doi:10.2307/40199801 · Cited by 1,829
Accounting for intermediates: Production sharing and trade in value added
Johnson, R. C., & Noguera, G. (2012) · Journal of International Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2011.10.003 · Cited by 1,769
Wallerstein, I. M. (1974) · Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · Cited by 1,701
Cited by
Post-growth: the science of wellbeing within planetary boundaries
Kallis, G., Hickel, J., O’Neill, D. W., Jackson, T., Victor, P. A., Raworth, K., Schor, J. B., Steinberger, J. K., & Ürge-Vorsatz, D. (2025) · The Lancet Planetary Health · doi:10.1016/s2542-5196(24)00310-3 · Cited by 261
Self-citationHickel, J., O’Neill, D. W., Fanning, A. L., & Zoomkawala, H. (2022) · The Lancet Planetary Health · doi:10.1016/s2542-5196(22)00044-4 · Cited by 229
Self-citationGupta, J., Bai, X., Liverman, D. M., Rockström, J., Qin, D., Stewart-Koster, B., Rocha, J. C., Jacobson, L., Abrams, J. F., Andersen, L. S., et al. (2024) · The Lancet Planetary Health · doi:10.1016/s2542-5196(24)00042-1 · Cited by 197
Keeping the global consumption within the planetary boundaries
Tian, P., Zhong, H., Chen, X., Feng, K., Sun, L., Zhang, N., Shao, X., Liu, Y., & Hubacek, K. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08154-w · Cited by 142
Existing climate mitigation scenarios perpetuate colonial inequalities
Hickel, J., & Slamersak, A. (2022) · The Lancet Planetary Health · doi:10.1016/s2542-5196(22)00092-4 · Cited by 127
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hickel, J., Dorninger, C., Wieland, H., & Suwandi, I.
- Venue
- Global Environmental Change
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-03
- Volume
- 73
- Pages
- 102467
- ISSN
- 0959-3780 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4212948295
- Cited by
- 592
- References
- 58
- FWCI
- 32.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Imperialist appropriation in the world economy: Drain from the global South through unequal exchange, 1990–2015. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102467
- The paper
- Hickel, J., Dorninger, C., Wieland, H., & Suwandi, I. (2022). Imperialist appropriation in the world economy: Drain from the global South through unequal exchange, 1990–2015. Global Environmental Change. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102467
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.