The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
RETRACTED: The application and challenges of ChatGPT in educational transformation: New demands for teachers' roles
Open accessAbstract
With the rapid development of information technology, artificial intelligence has demonstrated great potential in promoting educational transformation. In November 2022, the release of the artificial intelligence product ChatGPT attracted widespread attention, particularly in the field of education, sparking heated discussions among scholars. As a language processing tool, ChatGPT can not only answer user questions but also complete user-specified tasks and even continuously optimize task performance. However, while possessing powerful features, ChatGPT also has some shortcomings that need improvement, such as the accuracy of answering questions, data pollution issues, ethical and safety concerns, and the risk of knowledge plagiarism. In the process of promoting school education reform, the application of ChatGPT brings both opportunities and challenges. Moreover, ChatGPT's emergence offers teachers an opportunity to reflect on their professional value and sets higher demands for them.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This finding suggests that university students, in particular, value ChatGPT for its utility in completing academic tasks, such as writing assistance, research, and learning new concepts [1,7,20,65].”
From ChatGPT in Learning: Assessing Students’ Use Intentions through the Lens of Perceived Value and the Influence of AI Literacy (2024) · cites this paper as [65]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
BAİDOO-ANU, D., & OWUSU ANSAH, L. (2023) · Journal of AI · doi:10.61969/jai.1337500 · Cited by 3,939
Baidoo-Anu, D., & Owusu Ansah, L. (2023) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4337484 · Cited by 3,004
Students' voices on generative ai: perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education
Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.00290 · Cited by 2,504 · cited 1×
“Educators must be aware of these new competencies and integrate them into their teaching practices to prepare students for future demands [68].”
BackgroundStudents’ voices on generative AI: perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education
Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8 · Cited by 2,301 · cited 1×
“Educators must be aware of these new competencies and integrate them into their teaching practices to prepare students for future demands [68].”
BackgroundChatGPT User Experience: Implications for Education
Zhai, X. (2023) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4312418 · Cited by 935 · cited 1×
“A survey within the United States has unveiled a disconcerting trend: an overwhelming 89 % of university students surveyed acknowledged the utilization of ChatGPT for scholastic tasks [35].”
BackgroundTransformative effects of ChatGPT on modern education: Emerging Era of AI Chatbots
Gill, S. S., Xu, M., Patros, P., Wu, H., Kaur, R., Kaur, K., Fuller, S., Singh, M., Arora, P., Parlikad, A. K., et al. (2023) · Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems · doi:10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.06.002 · Cited by 638
The benefits and challenges of chatgpt: An overview
Deng, J., & Lin, Y. (2023) · Frontiers in Computing and Intelligent Systems · doi:10.54097/fcis.v2i2.4465 · Cited by 611
AI bot ChatGPT writes smart essays — should professors worry?
Stokel-Walker, C. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-022-04397-7 · Cited by 543
Artificial intelligence: Implications for the future of work
Howard, J. (2019) · American Journal of Industrial Medicine · doi:10.1002/ajim.23037 · Cited by 522
Impact of the Implementation of ChatGPT in Education: A Systematic Review
Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., Fernández-Batanero, J. M., & López-Meneses, E. (2023) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers12080153 · Cited by 509 · cited 1×
“Although several studies, including the systematic review by Rueda [1], have explored the impact of ChatGPT in education, a discernible gap persists in delineating its precise value for educators and its pragmatic applications within the classroom setting.”
Background
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Higher education students’ perceptions of ChatGPT: A global study of early reactions
Ravšelj, D., Keržič, D., Tomaževič, N., Umek, L., Brezovar, N., A. Iahad, N., Abdulla, A. A., Akopyan, A., Aldana Segura, M. W., AlHumaid, J., et al. (2025) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0315011 · Cited by 376
Raghu Raman, R., Mandal, S., Das, P., Kaur, T., Sanjanasri, J. P., & Nedungadi, P. (2024) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1155/2024/3085910 · Cited by 288
Mohebbi, A. (2025) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2024.2433814 · Cited by 161
Impact of large language model (ChatGPT) in healthcare: an umbrella review and evidence synthesis
Iqbal, U., Tanweer, A., Rahmanti, A. R., Greenfield, D., Lee, L. T.-J., & Li, Y.-C. J. (2025) · Journal of Biomedical Science · doi:10.1186/s12929-025-01131-z · Cited by 135
Sallam, M., El‐Sayed, W., Al‐Shorbagy, M. Y., Barakat, M. M., Khatib, S. E., Ghach, W., Alwan, N. H., Hallit, S. R., & Malaeb, D. N. (2024) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2024.1414758 · Cited by 151
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, H.
- Affiliations
- Shaanxi Normal University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Yu, Hao
- ORCID
- Yu, Hao
- Venue
- Heliyon
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e24289
- ISSN
- 2405-8440 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10828640
- OpenAlex
- W4390674638
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 33 · 2025: 104 · 2024: 88
- FWCI
- 84.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Status
- Retracted
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Heliyon (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Beijing Normal University (ICER201902)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Technology and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- ChatGPT, educational transformation, teacher role, artificial intelligence in education, school education reform, contaminated data, retracted article
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
