Cited by 59Cardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

How to manage patients with inappropriate sinus tachycardia

Shen, Win K.·2005·Heart Rhythm

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.hrthm.2005.05.002

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shen, W. K.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Shen, Win K.
Venue
Heart Rhythm
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-09
Volume
2
Issue
9
Pages
1015-1019
ISSN
1547-5271 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067794518
Cited by
59
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Heart Rhythm (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
inappropriate sinus tachycardia, diagnosis, pathophysiological mechanisms, treatment, multidisciplinary management, arrhythmia management
MeSH terms
Electrocardiography, Heart Conduction System, Heart Rate, Humans, Pacemaker, Artificial, Tachycardia, Sinus, Catheter Ablation, Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review