Cited by 154ECG Monitoring and AnalysisAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring

Assessing the accuracy of an automated atrial fibrillation detection algorithm using smartphone technology: the iREAD study

William, Amila D., Kanbour, Majd, Callahan, Thomas, Bhargava, Mandeep, Varma, Niraj, Rickard, John, Saliba, Walid, Wolski, Kathy +4 more·2018·Heart Rhythm

Abstract

Background The Kardia Mobile Cardiac Monitor (KMCM) detects atrial fibrillation (AF) via a handheld cardiac rhythm recorder and AF detection algorithm. The algorithm operates within predefined parameters to provide a "normal" or "possible atrial fibrillation detected" interpretation; outside of these parameters, an "unclassified" rhythm is reported. The system has been increasingly used, but its performance has not been independently tested.Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the KMCM system can accurately detect AF.Methods A single-center, adjudicator-blinded case series of 52 consecutive patients with AF admitted for antiarrhythmic drug initiation were enrolled. Serial 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) and nearly simultaneously acquired KMCM recordings were obtained.Results There were 225 nearly simultaneously acquired KMCM and ECG recordings across 52 enrolled patients (mean age 68 years; 67% male). After exclusion of unclassified recordings, the KMCM automated algorithm interpretation had 96.6% sensitivity and 94.1% specificity for AF detection as compared with physician-interpreted ECGs, with a κ coefficient of 0.89. Physician-interpreted KMCM recordings had 100% sensitivity and 89.2% specificity for AF detection as compared with physician-interpreted ECGs, with a κ coefficient of 0.85. Sixty-two recordings (27.6%) were unclassified by the KMCM algorithm. In these instances, physician interpretation of KMCM recordings had 100% sensitivity and 79.5% specificity for AF detection as compared with 12-lead ECG interpretation, with a κ coefficient of 0.71.Conclusion The KMCM system provides sensitive and specific AF detection relative to 12-lead ECGs when an automated interpretation is provided. Direct physician review of KMCM recordings can enhance diagnostic yield, especially for unclassified recordings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.06.037

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 14 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
William, A. D., Kanbour, M., Callahan, T., Bhargava, M., Varma, N., Rickard, J., Saliba, W., Wolski, K., Hussein, A., Lindsay, B. D., Wazni, O. M., & Tarakji, K. G.
Affiliations
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • Marshall University (US)
Corresponding author
Tarakji, Khaldoun G.
Venue
Heart Rhythm
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
15
Issue
10
Pages
1561-1565
ISSN
1547-5271 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2888509599
Cited by
154
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 2
FWCI
15.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Heart Rhythm (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity, 12-lead ECG
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Algorithms, Atrial Fibrillation, Electrocardiography, Female, Heart Conduction System, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Telemetry, Reproducibility of Results, Single-Blind Method, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review