Cited by 446ECG Monitoring and AnalysisAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring

Smartwatch Algorithm for Automated Detection of Atrial Fibrillation

Open access
Bumgarner, Joseph M., Lambert, Cameron T., Hussein, Ayman A., Cantillon, Daniel J., Baranowski, Bryan, Wolski, Kathy, Lindsay, Bruce D., Wazni, Oussama M. +1 more·2018·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Background The Kardia Band (KB) is a novel technology that enables patients to record a rhythm strip using an Apple Watch (Apple, Cupertino, California). The band is paired with an app providing automated detection of atrial fibrillation (AF).Objectives The purpose of this study was to examine whether the KB could accurately differentiate sinus rhythm (SR) from AF compared with physician-interpreted 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) and KB recordings.Methods Consecutive patients with AF presenting for cardioversion (CV) were enrolled. Patients underwent pre-CV ECG along with a KB recording. If CV was performed, a post-CV ECG was obtained along with a KB recording. The KB interpretations were compared to physician-reviewed ECGs. The KB recordings were reviewed by blinded electrophysiologists and compared to ECG interpretations. Sensitivity, specificity, and K coefficient were measured.Results A total of 100 patients were enrolled (age 68 ± 11 years). Eight patients did not undergo CV as they were found to be in SR. There were 169 simultaneous ECG and KB recordings. Fifty-seven were noninterpretable by the KB. Compared with ECG, the KB interpreted AF with 93% sensitivity, 84% specificity, and a K coefficient of 0.77. Physician interpretation of KB recordings demonstrated 99% sensitivity, 83% specificity, and a K coefficient of 0.83. Of the 57 noninterpretable KB recordings, interpreting electrophysiologists diagnosed AF with 100% sensitivity, 80% specificity, and a K coefficient of 0.74. Among 113 cases where KB and physician readings of the same recording were interpretable, agreement was excellent (K coefficient = 0.88).Conclusions The KB algorithm for AF detection supported by physician review can accurately differentiate AF from SR. This technology can help screen patients prior to elective CV and avoid unnecessary procedures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.03.003

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bumgarner, J. M., Lambert, C. T., Hussein, A. A., Cantillon, D. J., Baranowski, B., Wolski, K., Lindsay, B. D., Wazni, O. M., & Tarakji, K. G.
Affiliations
Cleveland Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Tarakji, Khaldoun G.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-05
Volume
71
Issue
21
Pages
2381-2388
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2791889721
Cited by
446
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 83 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 15
FWCI
41.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, automated detection, Apple Watch, smartwatches, electrocardiogram, sinus rhythm, cardioversion, physician review, diagnostic accuracy
MeSH terms
Wearable Electronic Devices, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Algorithms, Atrial Fibrillation, Electric Countershock, Electrocardiography, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Single-Blind Method, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review