Cited by 26Cancer survivorship and careCardiovascular and exercise physiologyPhysical Activity and Health

The Yale Fitness Intervention Trial in female cancer survivors: Cardiovascular and physiological outcomes

Open access
Knobf, M. Tish, Jeon, Sangchoon, Smith, Barbara, Harris, Lyndsay, Thompson, Siobhan, Stacy, Mitchel R., Insogna, Karl, Sinusas, Albert J.·2017·Heart & Lung

Abstract

Background Induced premature menopause and cardio-toxic therapy increase cardiovascular disease risk in female cancer survivors.Objective To compare the effects of a 12 month aerobic-resistance fitness center intervention to home based physical activity on cardiovascular function and metabolic risk factors.Methods Subjects (N = 154) who had completed primary and/or adjuvant chemotherapy (past 3 years) were randomized to a fitness center intervention or a home based group. The fitness center intervention was a structured thrice weekly aerobic (30 min brisk walking treadmill in target heart range) combined with resistance (30 min of lower body strength training) exercise program, supervised for the first 6 months. The home based group received national guidelines for 30 min moderate intensity exercise most days of the week. Fasting serum samples were collected at baseline, 6 and 12 months for insulin, glucose, lipids and hemoglobin A-1C. A graded exercise stress test was also performed at baseline and 6 months.Results The majority of subjects were white (85.7%), had breast cancer (83.1%) and the average age was 51.9 years. Subjects in the fitness center intervention had significantly improved time on treadmill (p = .039), improved heart rate recovery at 1 min (p = .028), greater MET minutes/week (p ≤ .0001), a trend for improved insulin resistance (p = .067) and stable insulin levels (p = .045) compared to the home based physical activity group.Conclusions Exercise represents a potential cardiac risk reduction intervention for cancer survivors. CLINICAL TRIALS.GOV: NCT01102985.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2017.06.001

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Knobf, M. T., Jeon, S., Smith, B., Harris, L., Thompson, S., Stacy, M. R., Insogna, K., & Sinusas, A. J.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
  • Knobf, M. Tish
  • Jeon, Sangchoon
  • Smith, Barbara
  • Harris, Lyndsay
  • Thompson, Siobhan
  • Stacy, Mitchel R.
  • Insogna, Karl
  • Sinusas, Albert J.
Venue
Heart & Lung
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-09
Volume
46
Issue
5
Pages
375-381
ISSN
0147-9563 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2744960472
Cited by
26
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Heart & Lung (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • NIH/NCI (R01CA122658)
  • NIH/NHLBI (5T32HL098069-07)
  • Yale CTSA (UL1TR000142)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
female cancer survivors, exercise intervention, concurrent training, home-based physical activity, cardiovascular function, heart rate recovery, treadmill exercise capacity, insulin resistance, metabolic risk factors, breast cancer, cardio-oncology
MeSH terms
Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Exercise Therapy, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Physical Fitness, Risk Factors, Time Factors, United States, Exercise, Prevalence, Survival Rate, Walking, Survivors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review