The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Asteroids were born big
Open accessAbstract
Abstract How big were the first planetesimals? We attempt to answer this question by conducting coagulation simulations in which the planetesimals grow by mutual collisions and form larger bodies and planetary embryos. The size frequency distribution (SFD) of the initial planetesimals is considered a free parameter in these simulations, and we search for the one that produces at the end objects with a SFD that is consistent with Asteroid belt constraints. We find that, if the initial planetesimals were small (e.g. km-sized), the final SFD fails to fulfill these constraints. In particular, reproducing the bump observed at diameter D ∼ 100 km in the current SFD of the asteroids requires that the minimal size of the initial planetesimals was also ∼100 km. This supports the idea that planetesimals formed big, namely that the size of solids in the proto-planetary disk “jumped” from sub-meter scale to multi-kilometer scale, without passing through intermediate values. Moreover, we find evidence that the initial planetesimals had to have sizes ranging from 100 to several 100 km, probably even 1000 km, and that their SFD had to have a slope over this interval that was similar to the one characterizing the current asteroids in the same size range. This result sets a new constraint on planetesimal formation models and opens new perspectives for the investigation of the collisional evolution in the Asteroid and Kuiper belts as well as of the accretion of the cores of the giant planets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Source regions and timescales for the delivery of water to the Earth
Morbidelli, A., Chambers, J., Lunine, J. I., Petit, J. M., Robert, F., Valsecchi, G. B., & Cyr, K. E. (2000) · Meteoritics & Planetary Science · doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2000.tb01518.x · Cited by 881 · cited 6×
“This classical model is appealing because it explains the accretion of Mercury- to Earth-sized bodies in the inner Solar System (2; 3; 4; 5) and, possibly, of super-Earth cores in the Jovian planet region (6; 7).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationMaking the Terrestrial Planets: N-Body Integrations of Planetary Embryos in Three Dimensions
Chambers, J. E., & Wetherill, G. W. (1998) · Icarus · doi:10.1006/icar.1998.6007 · Cited by 583
Final stages of planet formation
Goldreich, P., Lithwick, Y., & Sari, R. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/423612 · Cited by 207
Cited by
Perryman, M. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108304160 · Cited by 340
The structure of protoplanetary discs around evolving young stars
Bitsch, B., Johansen, A., Lambrechts, M., & Morbidelli, A. (2015) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424964 · Cited by 300
Self-citationContamination of the asteroid belt by primordial trans-Neptunian objects
Levison, H. F., Bottke, W. F., Gounelle, M., Morbidelli, A., Nesvorný, D., & Tsiganis, K. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08094 · Cited by 292
Self-citationTHE CANADA-FRANCE ECLIPTIC PLANE SURVEY—FULL DATA RELEASE: THE ORBITAL STRUCTURE OF THE KUIPER BELT
Petit, J.-M., Kavelaars, J. J., Gladman, B. J., Jones, R. L., Parker, J. W., Van Laerhoven, C., Nicholson, P., Mars, G., Rousselot, P., Mousis, O., et al. (2011) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-6256/142/4/131 · Cited by 289
Bottke, W. F., & Norman, M. D. (2017) · Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences · doi:10.1146/annurev-earth-063016-020131 · Cited by 271
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Morbidelli, A., Bottke, W. F., Nesvorný, D., & Levison, H. F.
- Venue
- Icarus
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-12
- Volume
- 204
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 558-573
- ISSN
- 0019-1035 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1990388558
- Cited by
- 528
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 16.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Asteroids were born big. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.icarus.2009.07.011
- The paper
- Morbidelli, A., Bottke, W. F., Nesvorný, D., & Levison, H. F. (2009). Asteroids were born big. Icarus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2009.07.011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.