The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency
Bandura, A. (1982) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.37.2.122 · Cited by 15,975
Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.6.2.144 · Cited by 8,815
Bruner, J. (1996) · doi:10.4159/9780674251083 · Cited by 6,231
Cited by
Modeling educational usage of Facebook
Mazman, S. G., & Usluel, Y. K. (2010) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.008 · Cited by 687
Al-Rahmi, W. M., Alias, N., Othman, M. S., Marin, V. I., & Tur, G. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.010 · Cited by 225
Examining student decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: theory and empirical tests
Hartshorne, R., & Ajjan, H. (2009) · Journal of Computing in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s12528-009-9023-6 · Cited by 220
Self-citationAl-Rahmi, W. M., & Zeki, A. M. (2017) · Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jksuci.2016.09.002 · Cited by 214
Mei, B., Brown, G. T. L., & Teo, T. (2018) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633117700144 · Cited by 168
Greenhow, C., Galvin, S. M., Brandon, D. L., & Askari, E. (2020) · Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/016146812012200602 · Cited by 162
Cao, Y., Ajjan, H., & Hong, P. (2013) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12066 · Cited by 156
Self-citationEvaluating the use and impact of Web 2.0 technologies in local government
Sivarajah, U., Irani, Z., & Weerakkody, V. (2015) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2015.06.004 · Cited by 152
Wading Through the World of Wikis: An Analysis of Three Wiki Projects
Ducate, L. C., Anderson, L. L., & Moreno, N. (2011) · Foreign Language Annals · doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.2011.01144.x · Cited by 97
Wang, T., Jung, C.-H., Kang, M.-H., & Chung, Y.-S. (2014) · Behaviour & Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2013.781221 · Cited by 95
Manu, B. D., Ying, F., Oduro, D., & Boateng, S. A. (2021) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100100 · Cited by 61
Al-Rahmi, W. M., Othman, M. S., & Yusuf, L. M. (2015) · Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology · doi:10.19026/rjaset.9.2608 · Cited by 55
Al-rahmi, W. M., Othman, M. S., & Mi Yusuf, L. (2015) · Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences · doi:10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n3s1p246 · Cited by 49
Amadu, L., Syed Muhammad, S., Mohammed, A. S., Owusu, G., & Lukman, S. (2018) · Journal of Technology and Science Education · doi:10.3926/jotse.383 · Cited by 47
Al-rahmi, W. M., Othman, M. S., & Mi Yusuf, L. (2015) · Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences · doi:10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4s1p193 · Cited by 43
Application of Web 2.0 Technologies in E-Government: A United Kingdom Case Study
Sivarajah, U., Irani, Z., & Jones, S. (2014) · 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.1109/hicss.2014.280 · Cited by 25
ŞENYURT, Y. S., & ŞAHİN, Ç. (2022) · Uluslararası Bilim ve Eğitim Dergisi · doi:10.47477/ubed.1082738 · Cited by 15
Szymanski, A., Paganelli, A., & Tassell, J. (2022) · Journal of Educational Technology Systems · doi:10.1177/00472395221114815 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Ajjan, H., & Hartshorne, R.
- Venue
- The Internet and Higher Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 71-80
- ISSN
- 1096-7516 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2045773168
- Cited by
- 965
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 96.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
