Cited by 29Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsPhytochemicals and Medicinal PlantsMedicinal Plants and Neuroprotection

Improving the inhibition of β-amyloid aggregation by withanolide and withanoside derivatives

Dubey, Shreya, Kallubai, Monika, Subramanyam, Rajagopal·2021·International Journal of Biological Macromolecules

Abstract

Here, we have studied the ameliorative effects of Withania somnifera derivatives (Withanolide A, Withanolide B, Withanoside IV, and Withanoside V) on the fibril formation of amyloid-β 42 for Alzheimer's disease. We analyzed reduction in the aggregation of β amyloid protein with these Ashwagandha derivatives by Thioflavin T assay in the oligomeric and fibrillar state. We have tested the cytotoxic activity of these compounds against human SK-N-SH cell line for 48 h, and the IC 50 value found to be 28.61 ± 2.91, 14.84 ± 1.45, 18.76 ± 0.76 and 30.14 ± 2.59 μM, respectively. After the treatment of the cells with half the concentration of IC 50 value, there was a remarkable decrease in the number of apoptotic cells stained by TUNEL assay indicating the DNA damage and also observed significant decrease of reactive oxygen species. Also, the binding and molecular stability of these derivatives with amyloid β was also studied using bioinformatics tools where these molecules were interacted at LVFFA region which is inhibition site of amyloid-β1 42. These studies revealed that the Withanolides and Withanosides interact with the hydrophobic core of amyloid-β 1-42 in the oligomeric stage, preventing further interaction with the monomers and diminishing aggregation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.01.094

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dubey, S., Kallubai, M., & Subramanyam, R.
Affiliations
University of Hyderabad (IN)
Corresponding author
Subramanyam, Rajagopal
Venue
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-03
Volume
173
Pages
56-65
ISSN
0141-8130 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3123061745
Cited by
29
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Biological Macromolecules (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Science and Engineering Research Board (SB/EMEQ-064/2014 dated 14-07-2015)
  • Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Phytochemicals and Medicinal Plants
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection
Keywords
amyloid beta aggregation inhibition, Withania somnifera, withanolides, Alzheimer's disease, cytotoxicity, apoptosis, reactive oxygen species, protein-ligand binding, hydrophobic core, oligomeric amyloid, SK-N-SH cells
MeSH terms
Protein Conformation, alpha-Helical, Protein Conformation, beta-Strand, Binding Sites, Cell Survival, Ergosterol, Humans, Neurons, Peptide Fragments, Plant Extracts, Protein Binding, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Neuroprotective Agents, Withania, Cell Line, Tumor, Withanolides, Protein Interaction Domains and Motifs, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, Molecular Docking Simulation, Protein Aggregates

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review