Cited by 9Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies

Failure of hybrid therapy for the prevention of long-term recurrence of atrial fibrillation

Open access
García Seara, Javier, Raposeiras Roubin, Sergio, Gude Sampedro, Francisco, Balboa Barreiro, Vanessa, Martínez Sande, Jose L., Rodríguez Mañero, Moisés, González Juanatey, José Ramón·2014·International Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Objectives To determine the long-term effectiveness of hybrid therapy in the control of atrial fibrillation (AF) as well as the differences in clinical outcomes between patients with antiarrhythmic drug atrial flutter (AAD-AFl), those with coexistent AFl and AF, and isolated AFl.Methods Four hundred eight patients who consecutively underwent cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation between 1998 and 2010 were followed for 5.9 years. Twenty-seven patients had AAD-AF1 (Group 1): they had AF but not AFl at baseline but on AAD therapy they showed typical AFl. They underwent CTI ablation and continued with AAD therapy, 96 patients had coexistent AF1 and AF at baseline (Group 2) and continued with AAD therapy at the discretion of their cardiologists and 284 patients had isolated AFl (Group 3).Results AF recurred in the majority of the AAD-AF1 patients (74%, incident density rate (IDR): 19.1/100 person-years). This incidence rate was similar to the recurrence rate of AF in patients with coexistent AFl and AF (59%, IDR: 19.2/100 person-years). The patients in Group 1 had a similar IDR of stroke as Group 2 and a slightly higher rate than Group 3. There were no significant differences in the IDR for death among Groups 1, 2 and 3.Conclusions Hybrid therapy was not effective for long-term control of AF. The clinical outcomes (AF, stroke and death) were similar for AAD-AF1 patients and patients with coexistent AF and AFl.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.06.042

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
García Seara, J., Raposeiras Roubin, S., Gude Sampedro, F., Balboa Barreiro, V., Martínez Sande, J. L., Rodríguez Mañero, M., & González Juanatey, J. R.
Venue
International Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-09
Volume
176
Issue
1
Pages
74-79
ISSN
0167-5273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2031835835
Cited by
9
References
28
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3
FWCI
1.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RUNA. Repositorio Institucional del Sergas (Servicio Gallego de Salud (SERGAS)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, hybrid therapy, antiarrhythmic drugs, cavotricuspid isthmus ablation, atrial fibrillation recurrence, stroke, mortality, long-term outcomes
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anti-Arrhythmia Agents, Atrial Fibrillation, Combined Modality Therapy, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Survival Rate, Treatment Outcome, Catheter Ablation, Treatment Failure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review