Cited by 757Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsSurvey Methodology and Nonresponse

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Vignette methodologies for studying clinicians’ decision-making: Validity, utility, and application in ICD-11 field studies

Open access
Evans, Spencer C., Roberts, Michael C., Keeley, Jared W., Blossom, Jennifer B., Amaro, Christina M., Garcia, Andrea M., Stough, Cathleen Odar, Canter, Kimberly S., Robles, Rebeca, Reed, Geoffrey M.·2015·International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology

Abstract

Vignette-based methodologies are frequently used to examine judgments and decision-making processes, including clinical judgments made by health professionals. Concerns are sometimes raised that vignettes do not accurately reflect “real world” phenomena, and that this affects the validity of results and conclusions of these studies. This article provides an overview of the defining features, design variations, strengths, and weaknesses of vignette studies as a way of examining how health professionals form clinical judgments (e.g., assigning diagnoses, selecting treatments). As a “hybrid” of traditional survey and experimental methods, vignette studies can offer aspects of both the high internal validity of experiments and the high external validity of survey research in order to disentangle multiple predictors of clinician behavior. When vignette studies are well designed to test specific questions about judgments and decision-making, they can be highly generalizable to “real life” behavior, while overcoming the ethical, practical, and scientific limitations associated with alternative methods (e.g., observation, self-report, standardized patients, archival analysis). We conclude with methodological recommendations and a description of how vignette methodologies are being used to investigate clinicians’ diagnostic decisions in case-controlled field studies for the ICD-11 classification of mental and behavioural disorders, and how these studies illustrate the preceding concepts and recommendations Las metodologías basadas en viñetas se utilizan frecuentemente para examinar los procesos de toma de decisiones, incluyendo los de profesionales sanitarios. No obstante, existen dudas sobre si las viñetas reflejan adecuadamente los fenómenos del “mundo real” permitiendo resultados y conclusiones válidas. Ofrecemos una visión de las características, variaciones de diseño, fortalezas y debilidades de estos estudios para examinar cómo los profesionales forman juicios clínicos (como el diagnóstico y tratamiento). Siendo “híbridos” de las encuestas tradicionales y los métodos experimentales, estos estudios pueden ofrecer la alta validez interna de los experimentos y la alta validez externa de las encuestas, para aislar múltiples factores predictivos del comportamiento de los clínicos. Un diseño adecuado para poner a prueba preguntas específicas acerca de los juicios y la toma de decisiones permite resultados altamente generalizables a la “vida real”, sin las limitaciones éticas, prácticas y científicas de los métodos alternativos (observación, auto-informe, pacientes estandarizados, análisis de archivos clínicos). Concluimos con recomendaciones metodológicas que se ilustran tras una descripción del uso de las metodologías de viñetas para investigar las decisiones diagnósticas de los clínicos en los estudios de campo de casos y controles para la clasificación de los trastornos mentales y del comportamiento en la CIE-11

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijchp.2014.12.001

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. Alexander, 1978, The use of vignettes in survey research, Public Opinion Quarterly, 42, 93, 10.1086/268432 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Atzmüller, 2010, Experimental vignette studies in survey research, Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 6, 128, 10.1027/1614-2241/a000014 · DOI
  3. Bachmann, 2008, Vignette studies of medical choice and judgment to study caregivers’ medical decision behavior: systematic review, BMC Research Methodology, 8
  4. Baudson, 2013, Teachers’ implicit personality theories about the gifted: An experimental approach, School Psychology Quarterly, 28, 37, 10.1037/spq0000011 · DOI
  5. Cullen, 2010, Survey-driven romanticism, Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1, 275, 10.1007/s13164-009-0016-1 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Evans, 2013, Psychologists’ perspectives on the diagnostic classification of mental disorders: Results from the WHO-IUPsyS Global Survey, International Journal of Psychology, 48, 177, 10.1080/00207594.2013.804189 · DOI
  7. Faia, 1980, The vagaries of the vignette world: A comment on Alves and Rossi, American Journal of Sociology, 85, 951, 10.1086/227096 · DOI
  8. Flaskerud, 1979, Use of vignettes to elicit responses toward broad concepts, Nursing Research, 28, 210, 10.1097/00006199-197907000-00004 · DOI
  9. Ganong, 2006, Multiple segment factorial vignette designs, Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 455, 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00264.x · DOI
  10. Gould, 1996, Using vignettes to collect data for nursing research studies: How valid are the findings?, Journal of Clinical Nursing, 5, 207, 10.1111/j.1365-2702.1996.tb00253.x · DOI
  11. Grøndal, 2009, A comparative case vignette study of decision making in forensic psychiatric cases, International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 8, 263, 10.1080/14999011003635639 · DOI
  12. Grønhøj, 2010, Using vignettes to study family consumption processes, Psychology & Marketing, 27, 445, 10.1002/mar.20338 · DOI
  13. Herskovitz, 1950, The hypothetical situation: A technique of field research, Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 6, 32, 10.1086/soutjanth.6.1.3628688 · DOI
  14. Howie, 2012, Children's event reports: Factors affecting responses to repeated questions in vignette scenarios and event recall interviews, British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 30, 550, 10.1111/j.2044-835X.2011.02064.x · DOI
  15. Hughes, 1998, Considering the vignette technique and its application to a study of drug injecting and HIV risk and safer behaviour, Sociology of Health & Illness, 20, 381, 10.1111/1467-9566.00107 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Hughes, 2001, The application of vignettes in social and nursing research, Methodological Issues in Nursing Research, 37, 382
  17. Jenkins, 2010, Putting it in context: The use of vignettes in qualitative interviewing, Qualitative Research, 10, 175, 10.1177/1468794109356737 · DOI
  18. Jones, 1973, Attribution of fault to a rape victim as a function of respectability of the victim, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 415, 10.1037/h0034463 · DOI
  19. Kim, 2012, Scenarios in information seeking and information retrieval research: A methodological application and discussion, Library & Information Science Research, 34, 300, 10.1016/j.lisr.2012.04.002 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Kirwan, 1983, Clinical judgment in rheumatoid arthritis. I. Rheumatologists’ opinions and the development of ‘paper patients’, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 42, 644, 10.1136/ard.42.6.644 · DOI
  21. Langley, 1991, Use of written cases to study factors associated with regional variations in referral rates, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 44, 391, 10.1016/0895-4356(91)90077-M · DOI
  22. Lauder, 2002, Factorial survey methods: A valuable but under-utilised research method in nursing research?, Nursing Times Research, 7, 35, 10.1177/136140960200700106 · DOI
  23. Levy Cole, 1996, Children's perceptions of ill peers: Effects of disease, grade, and impact variables, Children's Health Care, 25, 107, 10.1207/s15326888chc2502_3 · DOI
  24. Ludwick, 2004, An improved methodology for advancing nursing research: Factorial surveys, Advances in Nursing Science, 27, 224, 10.1097/00012272-200407000-00007 · DOI
  25. Ludwick, 2001, The factorial survey: An experimental method to replicate real world problems, Nursing Research, 50, 129, 10.1097/00006199-200103000-00009 · DOI
  26. Lunza, 1990, A methodological approach to enhance external validity in simulation based research, Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 11, 407, 10.3109/01612849009006526 · DOI
  27. Macpherson, 2010, Medical student attitudes about bioethics, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 19, 488, 10.1017/S0963180110000381 · DOI
  28. Maieron, 1996, Children's perceptions of peers with AIDS: Assessing the impact of contagion information, perceived similarity, and illness conceptualization, Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 21, 321, 10.1093/jpepsy/21.3.321 · DOI
  29. McCarron, 2011, A Canadian perspective on using vignettes to teach ethics in psychology, Canadian Psychology, 52, 185, 10.1037/a0024504 · DOI
  30. McGlynn, 1976, Sex and race as factors affecting the attribution of insanity in a murder trial, The Journal of Psychology, 93, 93, 10.1080/00223980.1976.9921378 · DOI
  31. Murphy, 1986, Evaluating the performance of paper people, Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 654, 10.1037/0021-9010.71.4.654 · DOI
  32. Peabody, 2007, A cross-national comparison of the quality of clinical care using vignettes, Health Policy and Planning, 22, 294, 10.1093/heapol/czm020 · DOI
  33. Peabody, 2000, Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: A prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality, Journal of the American Medical Association, 283, 1715, 10.1001/jama.283.13.1715 · DOI
  34. Peabody, 2004, Measuring the quality of physician practice by using clinical vignettes: A prospective validation study, Annals of Internal Medicine, 141, 771, 10.7326/0003-4819-141-10-200411160-00008 · DOI
  35. Reed, 2010, Toward ICD-11: Improving the clinical utility of WHO's international classification of mental disorders, Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 41, 457, 10.1037/a0021701 · DOI
  36. Reed, 2011, The WPA-WHO global survey of psychiatrists’ attitudes toward mental disorders classification, World Psychiatry, 10, 118, 10.1002/j.2051-5545.2011.tb00034.x · DOI
  37. Reed, 2013, Mental health professionals’ natural taxonomies of mental disorders: Implications for the clinical utility of the ICD-11 and the DSM-5, Journal of Clinical Psychology, 69, 1191, 10.1002/jclp.22031 · DOI
  38. Roberts, 1984, The role of socioeconomic status on children's perceptions of medical and psychological disorders, Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 13, 243, 10.1080/15374418409533197 · DOI
  39. Roberts, 2012, A global clinicians’ map of mental disorders to improve ICD-11: Analysing meta-structure to enhance clinical utility, International Review of Psychiatry, 24, 578, 10.3109/09540261.2012.736368 · DOI
  40. Ross, 1999, Sex and attitude: A randomized vignette study of the management of depression by general practitioners, British Journal of General Practice, 49, 17
  41. Rossi, 1974, Measuring household social standing, Social Science Research, 3, 169, 10.1016/0049-089X(74)90011-8 · DOI
  42. Schoenberg, 2000, Using vignettes in awareness and attitudinal research, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 3, 63, 10.1080/136455700294932 · DOI
  43. Shah, 2007, Measuring clinical practice, Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 27, 113, 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2006.00481.x · DOI
  44. Sniderman, 1996, Innovations in experimental design in attitude surveys, Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 377, 10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.377 · DOI
  45. Spalding, 2007, Exploring the use of vignettes: From validity to trustworthiness, Qualitative Health Research, 17, 954, 10.1177/1049732307306187 · DOI
  46. Spreng, C. P., Ojo, I. P., Burger, N. E., Sood, N., Peabody, J., W., & Demaria, L. M. (2014). Does stewardship make a difference in the quality of care? Evidence from clinics and pharmacies in Kenya and Ghana. International Journal for Quality of Health Care. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzu054. · DOI
  47. Stokes, 2011, Race, poverty and child protection decision making, British Journal of Social Work, 41, 1105, 10.1093/bjsw/bcr009 · DOI
  48. Stolte, 1994, The context of satisficing in vignette research, The Journal of Social Psychology, 134, 727, 10.1080/00224545.1994.9923007 · DOI
  49. Taylor, 2006, Factorial surveys: Using vignettes to study professional judgment, British Journal of Social Work, 36, 1187, 10.1093/bjsw/bch345 · DOI
  50. Veloski, 2005, Clinical vignette-based surveys: A tool for assessing physician practice variation, American Journal of Medical Quality, 20, 151, 10.1177/1062860605274520 · DOI
  51. Wainwright, 2010, The use of vignettes within a Delphi exercise: A useful approach in empirical ethics, Journal of Medical Ethics, 36, 656, 10.1136/jme.2010.036616 · DOI
  52. Wallander, 2009, 25 years of factorial surveys in sociology: A review, Social Science Research, 38, 505, 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.03.004 · DOI
  53. Wallander, 2012, Measuring social workers’ judgments: Why and how to use the factorial survey approach in the study of professional judgments, Journal of Social Work, 12, 364, 10.1177/1468017310387463 · DOI
  54. Walster, 1966, Assignment of responsibility for an automobile accident, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 73, 10.1037/h0022733 · DOI
  55. Wason, 2002, Designing vignette studies in marketing, Australasian Marketing Journal, 10, 41, 10.1016/S1441-3582(02)70157-2 · DOI
  56. Williamson, 1965, Assessing clinical judgment, Journal of Medical Evaluation, 40, 180

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Evans, S. C., Roberts, M. C., Keeley, J. W., Blossom, J. B., Amaro, C. M., Garcia, A. M., Stough, C. O., Canter, K. S., Robles, R., & Reed, G. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Kansas (US)
  • Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz (MX)
  • World Health Organization (CH)
Corresponding author
Roberts, Michael C.
Venue
International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-05
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
160-170
ISSN
1697-2600 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2050607941
Cited by
757
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 102 · 2025: 79 · 2024: 86 · 2023: 74 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 102 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 9
FWCI
45.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • KU ScholarWorks (University of Kansas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
Funders
World Health Organization
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Keywords
vignette study, clinician decision-making, clinical judgment, validity, generalizability, internal validity, diagnostic decision-making, ICD-11, treatment selection, methodological recommendations, standardized patients, archival analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review