Cited by 68Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Predictors of response to cognitive behaviour therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder

Open access
Kyrios, Michael, Hordern, Celia, Fassnacht, Daniel B.·2015·International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology

Abstract

Response to psychological treatment for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) varies, and dropout and relapse rates remain troubling. However, while studies examining symptom reductions are favourable, outcomes are less encouraging when outcome is defined in terms of clinically significant change. Moreover, there is little understanding of what predicts treatment outcome. This study examined demographic, symptomatic and cognitive predictors of outcome in 79 participants undertaking individualised cognitive-behavioural therapy for OCD. After investigating differences between treatment completers and non-completers, we examined treatment response as defined by post-treatment symptom severity and clinically reliable change, as well as predictors of treatment response. Completers were less likely to present with co-morbidity. The treatment was highly efficacious irrespective of whether completer or intention-to-treat analysis was undertaken, with 58% of treatment completers considered "recovered" at post-treatment. Lower pre-treatment levels of OCD symptoms and greater perfectionism/intolerance of uncertainty were the best unique predictors of OCD severity outcomes at post-treatment. Changes in obsessional beliefs were associated with symptomatic change, although only perfectionism/intolerance of uncertainty was a significant unique predictor of post-treatment change. Recovery status was predicted only by pre-treatment OCD severity. In helping to identify those at risk for poorer outcomes, such research can lead to the development of more effective interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijchp.2015.07.003

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research in other areas, such as anxiety disorders, has shown that using clinically significant change as an indicator of successful outcome may lead to more consistent findings.

    “Furthermore, research examining predictors of clinically significant change in other areas, such as anxiety disorders, has shown that using clinically significant change as indicator of successful outcome may actually lead to more consistent findings (Kyrios, Hordern, & Fassnacht, 2015).”

    From Predictors of outcomes of psychological treatments for disordered gambling: A systematic review (2016) · cites this paper as Kyrios, Hordern, & Fassnacht, 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Guidano V. Liotti G. Cognitive processes and emotional disorders 1983 Guilford Press New York

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kyrios, M., Hordern, C., & Fassnacht, D. B.
Affiliations
Australian National University (AU)
Corresponding author
Kyrios, Michael
Venue
International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
181-190
ISSN
1697-2600 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2109490115
Cited by
68
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4
FWCI
6.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
  • Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Melbourne
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
obsessive-compulsive disorder, cognitive behavioral therapy, treatment outcome predictors, treatment discontinuation, clinically significant change, perfectionism, intolerance of uncertainty, obsessional beliefs, comorbidities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review