Cited by 26Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPerfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies

Intolerance of uncertainty as a cognitive vulnerability for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A qualitative review.

Open access
Knowles, Kelly A., Olatunji, Bunmi O.·2023·Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice

Abstract

Intolerance of uncertainty (IU) is the tendency to react negatively to uncertain situations. In this review, we critically evaluate the evidence for IU as a cognitive vulnerability for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), including (a) evidence for a robust association between IU and OCD symptoms, (b) evidence that IU is stable and trait-like, (c) evidence for IU as a causal risk factor that influences the development of OCD directly or indirectly, and (d) evidence that IU is malleable to intervention. The available evidence suggests that IU is likely a candidate cognitive vulnerability factor for OCD, though additional research is needed to determine if increasing tolerance for uncertainty is a mechanism of effective OCD treatment. Future research examining IU across multiple levels of analysis and a more rigorous examination of the nomological network of IU may identify specific pathways contributing to the development and maintenance of OCD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/cps0000150

Cites

111 of 116 references verified1 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One investigation noted that OCD patients (and anxious controls) lacked the normal frontally maximal N2 seen in healthy subjects and failed to show the expected lengthening of N2 latency under increased inhibitory load.

    “one investigation noted that OCD patients (and anxious controls) lacked the normal frontally maximal N2 seen in healthy subjects and failed to show the expected lengthening of N2 latency under increased inhibitory load [26].”

    From Neural correlates of response inhibition following cognitive behavioral therapy in obsessive–compulsive disorder: a randomized controlled EEG study (2026) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Multimodal Measurement of IU section discusses P300 and error-related negativity, but not N2 findings in OCD patients or anxious controls. Searches for frontally maximal N2, N2 latency, and inhibitory load found no passage addressing the claimed investigation; page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Jacoby RJ, & Abramowitz JS (2017). Intolerance of uncertainty in OCD. In Pittenger C (Ed.), Obsessive-compulsive disorder: Phenomenology, pathophysiology, and treatment (pp. 171– 177). Oxford University Press. http://search.proquest.com/psycinfo/docview/2018649740/4525F0583DC44084PQ/68
  2. Pinciotti CM, Riemann BC, & Wetterneck CT (2020). Differences in intolerance of uncertainty in OCD and comorbid PTSD underlying attenuated treatment response. Annals of Psychiatry and Mental Health, 8(1), 1142. https://www.jscimedcentral.com/public/assets/articles/psychiatry-8-1142.pdf

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Knowles, K. A., & Olatunji, B. O.
Affiliations
  • Hartford Hospital (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
Venue
Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice
Published
2023-09
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
317-330
ISSN
  • 0969-5893 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2850
OpenAlex
W4377021379
Cited by
26
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3
FWCI
7.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Science and Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH018921)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
Keywords
intolerance of uncertainty, obsessive-compulsive disorder, cognitive vulnerability, causal risk factors, uncertainty tolerance, nomological network

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review