Cited by 123Educational Assessment and ImprovementSchool Choice and PerformanceClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Teachers’ decision-making: Data based or intuition driven?

Vanlommel, Kristin, Van Gasse, Roos, Vanhoof, Jan, Van Petegem, Peter·2017·International Journal of Educational Research

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijer.2017.02.013

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Blackwell, 2006, Consumer behaviour, Mason

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 123

Metadata

Authors
Vanlommel, K., Van Gasse, R., Vanhoof, J., & Van Petegem, P.
Affiliations
University of Antwerp (BE)
Corresponding author
Vanlommel, Kristin
Venue
International Journal of Educational Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017
Volume
83
Pages
75-83
ISSN
0883-0355 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2595488536
Cited by
123
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
11.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Educational Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Improvement
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Keywords
teacher decision-making, intuition, data-driven decision making, school retention, primary school teachers, teacher expertise, educational bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review