Cited by 481Stress and Burnout ResearchOccupational Health and BurnoutTeacher Professional Development and Motivation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 93 of the 93 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 8 of the 81 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Does teacher burnout affect students? A systematic review of its association with academic achievement and student-reported outcomes

Open access
Madigan, Daniel J., Kim, Lisa E.·2021·International Journal of Educational Research

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101714

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

8 of 81 cited sources checked · 4 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

Show all 51 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 26
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 37
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
54 of 54
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The included studies' measures of teacher burnout and student outcomes are valid and comparable enough to synthesize.

    “In the 14 studies included in the present review, 13 studies adopted Maslach's conceptualization of burnout.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The search strategy and inclusion criteria identified all relevant studies on the topic.

    “First, an extensive computerized literature search was conducted using the following common databases in psychology and education: PsycINFO, PsychARTICLES, MEDLINE, Education Abstracts, Educational Administration Abstracts, and ProQuest Dissertations (see also Mérida-López & Extremera, 2017).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The systematic review is the first to examine the association between teacher burnout and academic achievement and student-reported outcomes.

    “We have provided the first systematic review of research examining the association teacher burnout has with academic achievement and student-reported outcomes.”
3 of 3

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Reported maximum teacher age excludes an included study

    Minor

    The stated teacher mean-age range ends at 48.59 years, whereas Evers et al. report a mean of 49.07 years.

  • Reported teacher female-percentage range is too narrow

    Minor

    The stated maximum is 96.2%, but the Coman study reports 98.6% female teachers.

  • Reported minimum teacher age exceeds an included study's mean

    Minor

    The stated teacher mean-age range begins at 37.78 years, but Hoglund et al. report a mean of 37.38 years.

  • Reported minimum student age excludes preschool students

    Minor

    The student mean-age range starts at 5.90 years, but Coman reports a mean of 47.6 months, approximately 3.97 years.

4 of 4

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 70 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Maslach, 1986, Vol. 21, 3463

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 472

Metadata

Authors
Madigan, D. J., & Kim, L. E.
Affiliations
  • York St John University (GB)
  • University of York (GB)
Corresponding author
Madigan, Daniel J.
Venue
International Journal of Educational Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021
Volume
105
Pages
101714
ISSN
0883-0355 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3106528397
Cited by
481
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 105 · 2025: 108 · 2024: 96 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 27
FWCI
6.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Educational Research (publishedVersion)
  • Research at York St John (York St John University) (acceptedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational Health and Burnout
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Professional Development and Motivation
Keywords
teacher burnout, academic performance, student motivation, student well-being, teacher well-being, student outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review