Cited by 113Ovarian function and disordersReproductive Biology and FertilityEndometriosis Research and Treatment

Comparison of two aromatase inhibitors in women with clomiphene‐resistant polycystic ovary syndrome

Al‐Omari, W.R, Sulaiman, W.R, Al‐Hadithi, N·2004·International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijgo.2003.11.010

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two RCTs found no difference between letrozole and anastrozole for ovulation and pregnancy rate per cycle and miscarriage rate per pregnancy among women with CCR PCOS.

    “Two RCTs (level II), one with a high risk of bias 244 and one with a low risk of bias, 245 found no difference between letrozole and anastrozole for ovulation and pregnancy rate per cycle and miscarriage rate per pregnancy among women with CCR PCOS. 245”
  • In Al-Omari et al., endometrial thickness was greater in the letrozole group (8.2 mm) than in the anastrazole group (6.5 mm).

    “Endometrial thickness was greater in the letrozole group (8.2 mm) than in the anastrazole group (6.5 mm).”

    From A new era in ovulation induction (2006) · cites this paper as [52]

  • In Al-Omari et al., the ovulation rate was 84.4% in the letrozole group and 60% in the anastrazole group.

    “The ovulation rate in the letrozole group was 84.4% and in the anastrazole group was 60%.”

    From A new era in ovulation induction (2006) · cites this paper as [52]

  • In Al-Omari et al., pregnancy rates were statistically higher in the letrozole than in the anastrazole group (18.8% vs. 9.7% per cycle).

    “The pregnancy rates were also statistically higher in the letrozole than in the anastrazole group (18.8% vs. 9.7% per cycle, respectively).”

    From A new era in ovulation induction (2006) · cites this paper as [52]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Al‐Omari, W. R., Sulaiman, W. R., & Al‐Hadithi, N.
Affiliations
University of Baghdad (IQ)
Venue
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-06
Volume
85
Issue
3
Pages
289-291
ISSN
  • 0020-6695 (ISSN-L)
  • 0020-7292
  • 1879-3479
OpenAlex
W2008653064
Cited by
113
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
Keywords
aromatase inhibitors, clomiphene citrate resistance, polycystic ovary syndrome, ovulation induction, anovulation
MeSH terms
Letrozole, Anastrozole, Adult, Clomiphene, Estrogen Antagonists, Female, Humans, Nitriles, Ovulation, Ovulation Induction, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Pregnancy, Triazoles, Aromatase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review