Cited by 78Malaria Research and ControlGlobal Maternal and Child HealthMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

A systematic review of the impact of malaria prevention in pregnancy on low birth weight and maternal anemia

McClure, Elizabeth M., Goldenberg, Robert L., Dent, Arlene E., Meshnick, Steven R.·2013·International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Malaria in pregnancy is a significant contributor to adverse pregnancy outcome, especially in Sub-Saharan Africa. Prevention with sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine (SP) during pregnancy has been recommended in malaria-endemic areas but concerns remain about its benefit. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between recommended preventative SP programs in pregnancy and low birth weight (LBW) and maternal anemia through available clinical trial, observational, and programmatic evaluation studies. SEARCH STRATEGY: Systematic review of published studies on malaria in pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes. SELECTION CRITERIA: Clinical studies from Sub-Saharan Africa from the past 10 years were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: English articles published since 2002 and listed in PubMed were identified using defined keywords, and their source documents were reviewed. Thirty-three studies involving malaria in pregnancy that recorded treatment rates and birth outcomes were included. MAIN RESULTS: SP use among primigravidae was consistently associated with decreased LBW and anemia rates in clinical trials. Effects were less consistent in observational studies. CONCLUSIONS: Although randomized trials have demonstrated the efficacy of SP, studies evaluating scale-up programs found less consistent reductions in LBW and maternal anemia. Additional strategies to improve SP coverage may reduce the LBW and maternal anemia associated with malaria in pregnancy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.12.014

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McClure, E. M., Goldenberg, R. L., Dent, A. E., & Meshnick, S. R.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
Corresponding author
McClure, Elizabeth M.
Venue
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-03-13
Volume
121
Issue
2
Pages
103-109
ISSN
  • 0020-6695 (ISSN-L)
  • 0020-7292
OpenAlex
W2054150443
Cited by
78
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
malaria in pregnancy, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, malaria prevention in pregnancy, low birth weight, anemia in pregnancy, primigravida, adverse pregnancy outcomes, sub-Saharan Africa
MeSH terms
Anemia, Antimalarials, Drug Combinations, Female, Humans, Infant, Low Birth Weight, Infant, Newborn, Malaria, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious, Pregnancy Outcome, Pyrimethamine, Sulfadoxine, Africa South of the Sahara

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review