Cited by 43Air Quality and Health ImpactsDermatology and Skin DiseasesAsthma and respiratory diseases

The effects of particulate matter on atopic dermatitis symptoms are influenced by weather type: Application of spatial synoptic classification (SSC)

Kim, Young-Min, Kim, Jihyun, Jung, Kwon, Eo, Soomi, Ahn, Kangmo·2018·International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health

Abstract

The effects of weather and air pollution on atopic dermatitis (AD) flares have not been well investigated. To investigate the effects of particulate matter (PM) on AD symptoms by weather type, a total of 125 young children (76 boys and 49 girls) under 6 years of age with AD living in Seoul, Korea, were enrolled as a panel and followed for 17 months between August 2013 and December 2014. AD symptoms were recorded on a daily basis, including itching, sleep disturbance, erythema, dry skin, oozing, and edema. Daily weather was classified into 7 categories according to spatial synoptic classification (SSC). Personal exposure to PM with an aerodynamic diameter less than 2.5 and 10 μm (PM 2.5 and PM 10, respectively) in each individual was estimated with time-weighted average concentrations considering outdoor and indoor levels of PMs and time to spend outdoors or indoors in a day. Generalized linear mixed models were used to analyze the effects of PM 2.5 and PM 10 on AD symptoms, controlling for ambient temperature, humidity, age, sex, SCORAD (SCORing of AD) at enrollment, fever, day of week, and topical corticosteroid use. A total of 20,168 person-days of symptom records were collected. The presence of AD symptoms was higher on dry polar (DP) days (45.4%, P < .0001) than on moist tropical (MT) days (37.7%, P < .0001). Overall, the risk of AD symptoms significantly increased with increased exposure to PM 2.5 and PM 10. Among the 7 weather types, the risks of AD symptoms caused by PM 2.5 and PM 10 exposure were significantly increased on dry moderate (DM) days, while not significant on the other weather types. In addition, lagged effect of PM 2.5 up to 4 days was found on DM days. In conclusion, dry moderate weather type, particulate matters, and their modifying effects should be simultaneously considered for proper management of AD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijheh.2018.05.006

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several short-term studies reported lag effects of air pollutants on atopic dermatitis, with the most popular lag choice varying from 0 to 5 days and most studies showing the strongest effect at Lag0.

    “Several short-term studies (mostly TS) have reported lag effects of air pollutants on AD, with the most popular lag choice varying from 0 to 5 days and with most studies showing the strongest effect at Lag0 (current day) [40, 51, 62].”
  • The risk of experiencing pollution-induced disease symptoms was shown to be higher in dry-moderate weather conditions.

    “In a further study88 conducted on 125 children aged 6 years at most, the risk of experiencing pollution‐induced disease symptoms was shown to be higher in dry–moderate weather conditions.”

    From The impact of airborne pollution on skin (2019) · cites this paper as [88]

  • Our previous epidemiologic studies showed that PM2.5 is associated with the exacerbation of AD in children.

    “Our previous epidemiologic studies also showed that PM2.5 is associated with the exacerbation of AD in children (24–26).”

    From Particulate matter causes skin barrier dysfunction. (2021) · cites this paper as [25]

  • The concentrations of PM2.5 in Asian countries are higher than in European countries.

    “The concentrations of PM2.5 in Asian countries are higher than in European countries (https://aqicn.org) (25, 70, 71).”

    From Particulate matter causes skin barrier dysfunction. (2021) · cites this paper as [25]

  • The outdoor concentrations of PM2.5 in cities such as Seoul, Korea, and Beijing, China, reach up to 200 μg/m3 and 800 μg/m3, respectively.

    “The outdoor concentrations of PM2.5 in cities such as Seoul, Korea, and Beijing, China, reach up to 200 μg/m3 (about 0.2 ng/mL) and 800 μg/m3 (about 0.8 ng/mL), respectively (https://aqicn.org) (2, 25, 70, 75).”

    From Particulate matter causes skin barrier dysfunction. (2021) · cites this paper as [25]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, Y.-M., Kim, J., Jung, K., Eo, S., & Ahn, K.
Affiliations
Samsung Medical Center (KR)
Corresponding author
Ahn, Kangmo
Venue
International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
221
Issue
5
Pages
823-829
ISSN
1438-4639 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2807688053
Cited by
43
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 2
FWCI
3.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Environmental Health Research Center Project by the Ministry of Environment, Korea
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
Keywords
atopic dermatitis, particulate matter, PM2.5, PM10, weather types, spatial synoptic classification, air pollution exposure, children, symptom flares, lagged exposure effects
MeSH terms
Air Pollutants, Child, Preschool, Dermatitis, Atopic, Environmental Exposure, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Weather, Particulate Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review