CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 309Privacy, Security, and Data ProtectionCommunication and COVID-19 ImpactPublic Relations and Crisis Communication

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Inside out and outside in: How the COVID-19 pandemic affects self-disclosure on social media

Open access
Nabity-Grover, Teagen, Cheung, Christy M.K., Thatcher, Jason Bennett·2020·International Journal of Information Management
DOI 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102188PMC PMC7320916
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

As social distancing and lockdown orders grew more pervasive, individuals increasingly turned to social media for support, entertainment, and connection to others. We posit that global health emergencies - specifically, the COVID-19 pandemic - change how and what individuals self-disclose on social media. We argue that IS research needs to consider how privacy (self-focused) and social (other-focused) calculus have moved some issues outside in (caused by a shift in what is considered socially appropriate) and others inside out (caused by a shift in what information should be shared for the public good). We identify a series of directions for future research that hold potential for furthering our understanding of online self-disclosure and its factors during health emergencies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102188

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 48 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–308 of 308

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Nabity-Grover, T., Cheung, C. M. K., & Thatcher, J. B.
Affiliations
  • Boise State University (US)
  • Hong Kong Baptist University (HK)
  • Temple University (US)
Corresponding author
Thatcher, Jason Bennett
ORCID
Venue
International Journal of Information Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
55
Pages
102188
ISSN
0268-4012 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102188
PMC
PMC7320916
OpenAlex
W3037942277
Semantic Scholar
112631e5ace683d45daea194f5c518abd5d9a91f
Cited by
309
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 95 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 16
FWCI
76.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • International Journal of Information Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scholar Works (Boise State University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, self-disclosure, social media, privacy calculus, health emergencies, social distancing, lockdown, online self-disclosure, public goods, information sharing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review