The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Patients’ perceptions of a home telecare system
Open accessAbstract
GOAL To identify any major factors that could affect patients' perceptions of a Home Telecare Management System (HTMS) and use the findings to contribute to development of a theoretical framework for patient acceptance of HTMS. MATERIALS AND METHODS Ten Focus Group Interviews (FGIs) were conducted with patients suffering from congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), or both, from seven different ethnic groups in Sydney. Six key discussion points were used to conduct the FGIs. The participants were shown a video demonstrating the HTMS and its operation, followed by the demonstration of an HTMS prototype. The participants, who had no prior experience with the HTMS, were then asked questions to access their perceptions in potentially real situations. The discussions were audio-taped and content analysis performed. RESULTS Four major themes and 16 sub-themes were identified. The themes were: intention to use the HTMS, the impact of the HTMS on patients' health management, concerns associated with using the HTMS, and the impact of the HTMS on healthcare services. CONCLUSION Most participants perceived the system as a useful and convenient mode of health care delivery, expressed positive attitudes toward the HTMS and expressed intent to use the system. However, there were concerns centred on the issues of cost, ease of use, clinical support, low self-efficacy and anxiety related to the use of the HTMS. The findings of this study suggest that HTMS self-efficacy and anxiety are likely to be important constructs in patients' acceptance of home telecare. Therefore, we propose these two factors be included in future HTMS acceptance models. Also it is suggested that in order to develop training programs for patients to use HTMS, tailored training components should aim to reduce 'HTMS anxiety' and improve 'HTMS self-efficacy'. Participants agreed that the HTMS would save cost and time by reducing hospital admissions, emergency department and medical practitioner visits and associated travel. Participants generally agreed that the HTMS could inform patients of their health conditions, thus promoting active participation in their health management and empowering them to perform better self-care. Also, they agreed that the HTMS could improve their health management by their doctors by providing more accurate and up-to-date information, to help them make better decisions. They suggested that the HTMS could have a preventative role in terms of providing early warning when their health conditions were deteriorating, which could lead to on-time appropriate interventions. The latter may result in reducing the use of emergency services and hospital admissions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Handbook of Qualitative Research
Crozier, G., Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121684 · Cited by 26,666
A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb01822.x · Cited by 3,802
Assessing IT Usage: The Role of Prior Experience
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249633 · Cited by 2,891
Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology
Hu, P. J., Chau, P. Y. K., Sheng, O. R. L., & Tam, K. Y. (1999) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.1999.11518247 · Cited by 1,951
Empirical Evaluation of the Revised Technology Acceptance Model
Szajna, B. (1996) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.42.1.85 · Cited by 1,656
Cited by
A systematic review of the smart home literature: A user perspective
Marikyan, D., Papagiannidis, S., & Alamanos, E. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.08.015 · Cited by 718
Structured telephone support or telemonitoring programmes for patients with chronic heart failure
Inglis, S. C., Clark, R. A., McAlister, F. A., Ball, J., Lewinter, C., Cullington, D., Stewart, S., & Cleland, J. G. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007228.pub2 · Cited by 614
A Systematic Review of Patient Acceptance of Consumer Health Information Technology
Or, C. K. L., & Karsh, B.-T. (2009) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m2888 · Cited by 586
Smart homes — Current features and future perspectives
Chan, M., Campo, E., Estève, D., & Fourniols, J.-Y. (2009) · Maturitas · doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2009.07.014 · Cited by 585
Elderly persons’ perception and acceptance of using wireless sensor networks to assist healthcare
Steele, R., Lo, A., Secombe, C., & Wong, Y. K. (2009) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.08.001 · Cited by 508
Metadata
- Authors
- Rahimpour, M., Lovell, N. H., Celler, B. G., & McCormick, J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Medical Informatics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-07
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 486-498
- ISSN
- 1386-5056 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2028281270
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 5.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patients’ perceptions of a home telecare system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.10.006
- The paper
- Rahimpour, M., Lovell, N. H., Celler, B. G., & McCormick, J. (2008). Patients’ perceptions of a home telecare system. International Journal of Medical Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.10.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.