Cited by 1,656Technology Adoption and User BehaviourInformation Systems Theories and ImplementationInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

Empirical Evaluation of the Revised Technology Acceptance Model

Szajna, Bernadette·1996·Management Science

Abstract

Davis et al. (Davis, F. D., R. P. Bagozzi, P. R. Warshaw. 1989. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Sci. 35(8) 982–1003.) proposed, tested, and revised the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), which attempts to explain and predict why users sometimes accept and sometimes reject information systems (IS). The research reported here (1) provides a confirmatory, empirical test of the revised TAM and (2) introduces and objective measure of technology acceptance, actual usage rather than self-report usage. Subjects' beliefs about the usefulness and ease of use of an electronic mail system, their intentions to use the system, and their usage of it 15 weeks later were measured in a longitudinal study. The results confirmed that the TAM is a valuable tool for predicting intentions to use an IS. The findings here combined with results from other studies in this area suggest that the original TAM may be more appropriate than the two-version revised TAM. However, the addition of an experience component to the original TAM may be a significant enhancement. In addition, the results support that self-report usage may not be an appropriate surrogate measure for actual usage.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/mnsc.42.1.85

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Szajna, B.
Affiliations
Texas Christian University (US)
Corresponding author
Szajna, Bernadette
Venue
Management Science
Published
1996-01
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
85-92
ISSN
  • 0025-1909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-5501
OpenAlex
W2117948235
Cited by
1,656
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 58 · 2015: 80 · 2014: 86 · 2013: 72 · 2012: 104
FWCI
38.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Management Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
technology acceptance model, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, intention to use, email systems, longitudinal study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review