The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Physicians’ beliefs about using EMR and CPOE: In pursuit of a contextualized understanding of health IT use behavior
Open accessAbstract
Purpose To identify and describe physicians' beliefs about use of electronic medical records (EMR) and computerized provider order entry (CPOE) for inpatient and outpatient care, to build an understanding of what factors shape information technology (IT) use behavior in the unique context of health care delivery. Methods Semi-structured qualitative research interviews were carried out, following the beliefs elicitation approach. Twenty physicians from two large Midwest US hospitals participated. Physicians were asked questions to elicit beliefs and experiences pertaining to their use of EMR and CPOE. Questions were based on a broad set of behavior-shaping beliefs and the methods commonly used to elicit those beliefs. Results Qualitative analysis revealed numerous themes related to the perceived emotional and instrumental outcomes of EMR and CPOE use; perceived external and personal normative pressure to use those systems; perceived volitional control over use behavior; perceived facilitators and barriers to system use; and perceptions about the systems and how they were implemented. EMR and CPOE were commonly believed to both improve and worsen the ease and quality of personal performance, productivity and efficiency, and patient outcomes. Physicians felt encouraged by employers and others to use the systems but also had personal role-related and moral concerns about doing so. Perceived facilitators and barriers were numerous and had their sources in all aspects of the work system. Conclusion Given the breadth and detail of elicited beliefs, numerous design and policy implications can be identified. Additionally, the findings are a first step toward developing a theory of health IT acceptance and use contextualized to the unique setting of health care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Work system design for patient safety: the SEIPS model
Carayon, P., Schoofs Hundt, A., Karsh, B.-T., Gurses, A. P., Alvarado, C. J., Smith, M., & Flatley Brennan, P. (2006) · Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1136/qshc.2005.015842 · Cited by 1,795 · cited 1×
“…environment of work stations and walls (i.e., connectivity), to organizational factors such as provision of technical support and other resources, to the content and timing of tasks, to technological capability and usability, to cognitive and motivational personal factors, and more [49,50].”
BackgroundAsh, J. S. (2003) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m1471 · Cited by 1,789
Use of Electronic Health Records in U.S. Hospitals
Jha, A. K., DesRoches, C. M., Campbell, E. G., Donelan, K., Rao, S. R., Ferris, T. G., Shields, A., Rosenbaum, S., & Blumenthal, D. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa0900592 · Cited by 1,473
Types of Unintended Consequences Related to Computerized Provider Order Entry
Campbell, E. M., Sittig, D. F., Ash, J. S., Guappone, K. P., & Dykstra, R. H. (2006) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m2042 · Cited by 823
Koppel, R., Wetterneck, T., Telles, J. L., & Karsh, B.-T. (2008) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m2616 · Cited by 685
Technology Acceptance among Physicians: A New Take on TAM
Yarbrough, A. K., & Smith, T. B. (2007) · Medical Care Research and Review · doi:10.1177/1077558707305942 · Cited by 482
Kaplan, B. (2001) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/s1386-5056(01)00184-8 · Cited by 380
Pare, G., Sicotte, C., & Jacques, H. (2006) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m1930 · Cited by 222
Turning Off Frequently Overridden Drug Alerts: Limited Opportunities for Doing It Safely
van der Sijs, H., Aarts, J., van Gelder, T., Berg, M., & Vulto, A. (2008) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m2311 · Cited by 175
Cited by
Health information technology: fallacies and sober realities
Karsh, B.-T., Weinger, M. B., Abbott, P. A., & Wears, R. L. (2010) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/jamia.2010.005637 · Cited by 365
Clinical Benefits of Electronic Health Record Use: National Findings
King, J., Patel, V., Jamoom, E. W., & Furukawa, M. F. (2014) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12135 · Cited by 273
Taheri Moghadam, S., Sadoughi, F., Velayati, F., Ehsanzadeh, S. J., & Poursharif, S. (2021) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-020-01376-8 · Cited by 136
Druss, B. G., & Dimitropoulos, L. (2013) · General Hospital Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2013.03.012 · Cited by 32
Brief review: Adoption of electronic medical records to enhance acute pain management
Goldstein, D. H., Phelan, R., Wilson, R., Ross-White, A., VanDenKerkhof, E. G., Penning, J. P., & Jaeger, M. (2014) · Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie · doi:10.1007/s12630-013-0069-6 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Holden, R. J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Medical Informatics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-02
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 71-80
- ISSN
- 1386-5056 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2128374977
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 29.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physicians’ beliefs about using EMR and CPOE: In pursuit of a contextualized understanding of health IT use behavior. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.12.003
- The paper
- Holden, R. J. (2010). Physicians’ beliefs about using EMR and CPOE: In pursuit of a contextualized understanding of health IT use behavior. International Journal of Medical Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.12.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
