The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: A systematic review
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: To provide an overview of factors influencing the acceptance of electronic technologies that support aging in place by community-dwelling older adults. Since technology acceptance factors fluctuate over time, a distinction was made between factors in the pre-implementation stage and factors in the post-implementation stage. METHODS: A systematic review of mixed studies. Seven major scientific databases (including MEDLINE, Scopus and CINAHL) were searched. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) original and peer-reviewed research, (2) qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods research, (3) research in which participants are community-dwelling older adults aged 60 years or older, and (4) research aimed at investigating factors that influence the intention to use or the actual use of electronic technology for aging in place. Three researchers each read the articles and extracted factors. RESULTS: Sixteen out of 2841 articles were included. Most articles investigated acceptance of technology that enhances safety or provides social interaction. The majority of data was based on qualitative research investigating factors in the pre-implementation stage. Acceptance in this stage is influenced by 27 factors, divided into six themes: concerns regarding technology (e.g., high cost, privacy implications and usability factors); expected benefits of technology (e.g., increased safety and perceived usefulness); need for technology (e.g., perceived need and subjective health status); alternatives to technology (e.g., help by family or spouse), social influence (e.g., influence of family, friends and professional caregivers); and characteristics of older adults (e.g., desire to age in place). When comparing these results to qualitative results on post-implementation acceptance, our analysis showed that some factors are persistent while new factors also emerge. Quantitative results showed that a small number of variables have a significant influence in the pre-implementation stage. Fourteen out of the sixteen included articles did not use an existing technology acceptance framework or model. CONCLUSIONS: Acceptance of technology in the pre-implementation stage is influenced by multiple factors. However, post-implementation research on technology acceptance by community-dwelling older adults is scarce and most of the factors in this review have not been tested by using quantitative methods. Further research is needed to determine if and how the factors in this review are interrelated, and how they relate to existing models of technology acceptance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Some older adults will perceive a technology as being more relevant for other elderly people with more extensive functional impairments56 and be less motivated to use it themselves.”
From Usability and acceptability of technology for community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic literature review (2018) · cites this paper as [56]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Engaging older adults in a preimplementation study thus risks obtaining a “prototypical result,” according to Peek et al (2014).56”
From Usability and acceptability of technology for community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic literature review (2018) · cites this paper as [56]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This is in line with Peek et al (2014, p. 242), who found that a perceived personal need for technology was the most frequent factor mentioned for technology use and acceptance.56”
From Usability and acceptability of technology for community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic literature review (2018) · cites this paper as [56]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203710753-35 · Cited by 37,670
Valente, T. W. (2003) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.gim.0000061743.67794.c4 · Cited by 20,559
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41410412 · Cited by 15,756
Revisiting the Behavioral Model and Access to Medical Care: Does it Matter?
Andersen, R. M. (1995) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2137284 · Cited by 9,831
Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-8-45 · Cited by 9,312
Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model
Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00143-4 · Cited by 4,250
Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W., & Chervany, N. L. (1999) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249751 · Cited by 3,833
A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model
King, W. R., & He, J. (2006) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2006.05.003 · Cited by 2,906
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–999 of 999
Exploring Older Adults’ Adoption of WeChat Pay: A Cognitive Lock-In Perspective
Liu, T., & Li, X. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-05581-2_36 · Cited by 3
Yu, R. W. L., & Chan, A. H. S. (2022) · Automation, collaboration, and e-services · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-10788-7_21 · Cited by 1
Factores clave en los procesos de adopción de tecnología
Muñoz, J. A. H., & Tamayo, L. J. H. (2022) · 360 Revista de Ciencias de la Gestión · doi:10.18800/360gestion.202207.009 · Cited by 1
Responding to COVID-19: Privacy Implications of the Rapid Adoption of ICTs
Knight, T., Yuan, X., Gayle, D. B., & LaForce, S. (2023) · Synthesis lectures on information concepts, retrieval, and services · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-06897-3_7 · Cited by 1
Kuffour, E. A. (2023) · Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies · doi:10.9734/ajess/2023/v43i3945 · Cited by 1
Penerapan Model Penerimaan Teknologi pada Intensi Penggunaan E-health: Kerangka Konseptual
Sudarmadji, S. (2023) · Labs Jurnal Bisnis dan Manajemen · doi:10.57134/labs.v28i2.52 · Cited by 2
Assessment of a digital intervention program with Holocaust survivors
Cohn‐Schwartz, E., Mannheim, I., & Meiry, L. (2023) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607863.2023.2240263 · Cited by 1
Kuźmicz, M. M. (2023) · European Journal of Crime Criminal Law and Criminal Justice · doi:10.1163/15718174-bja10049 · Cited by 2
Enhancing Elderly Well-Being Through the Adoption of Medication Adherence System
Tan, B. C., Pang, S. M., Lau, T. C., Lo, Y. T., & Tan, A. H. P. (2024) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-8498-5_9 · Cited by 1
Moody, L., Wood, E., Needham, A., Booth, A., & Tindale, W. B. (2024) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076241247196 · Cited by 1
Purwati, D., Astawan, I. G., & Antara, P. A. (2024) · Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Undiksha · doi:10.23887/paud.v12i1.74007 · Cited by 1
Jain, P., Pendyala, S., Etu, E.-E., Zhang, Z., Shah, M., Larot, J., & Huang, G. (2024) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/10711813241276479 · Cited by 1
Advanced Autonomous Vehicle Acceptance Model (AAVAM) for Promoting Accessible Travel
Chen, L., Liu, Y., Luan, X., Yang, L., Song, Y., & Qin, S. (2024) · International Conference on Automation and Computing (ICAC) · doi:10.1109/icac61394.2024.10718798 · Cited by 1
In-Person versus Virtual CEASE Smoking Cessation Interventions
Sheikhattari, P., Barsha, R. A. A., Egboluche, C., Foster, A., & Assari, S. (2024) · Journal of biomedical and life sciences. · doi:10.31586/jbls.2024.1107 · Cited by 1
Islam, M. A., Rahman, M. H., Islam, R., Abdullah, A., Mohammad, A., Emon, F. H., & Tanvir, K. A. (2024) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-71821-2_1 · Cited by 1
李, 梓. (2025) · Advances in Psychology · doi:10.12677/ap.2025.151029 · Cited by 1
Challenging assumptions: narrative analysis of interviews for digital health development
Bradway, M., Álvarez-Malé, M. L., Wägner, A. M., & Dyb, K. (2025) · BMC Digital Health · doi:10.1186/s44247-025-00211-2 · Cited by 1
Participatory Design of a Platform for the Promotion of Assistive Technology in Switzerland.
Angelini, L., Hüsler, S.-S., Pauli, C., & Zaccaria, D. (2025) · Interaction design & architecture(s)/ID&A Interaction design & architecture(s) · doi:10.55612/s-5002-065-004 · Cited by 1
Healthcare Informatics and Technology in Managing the Older Cancer Patient
Shen, J., Xie, Z., & Naeim, A. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-44870-1_89-1 · Cited by 1
Wireless Sensors Network for Elder Monitoring
da Silva, V. L., Soares, C. L., Sousa, M. R. B., & de Senna, V. (2018) · Revista de Tecnologia da Informação e Comunicação · Cited by 1
MutualMonitor: A Tool for Elderly People to Anonymously Monitor Each Other
Dawadi, R., Mizumoto, T., & Yasumoto, K. (2018) · International Conference on Mobile Computing and Ubiquitous Network (ICMU) · doi:10.23919/icmu.2018.8653616 · Cited by 1
김수완, & Choi, J. (2018) · 한국사회정책 · doi:10.17000/kspr.25.1.201803.287 · Cited by 1
Furda, R., & Greguš, M. (2019) · Lecture notes on data engineering and communications technologies · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-19069-9_2 · Cited by 1
An, J., & Park, K. (2019) · Journal of Digital Convergence · doi:10.14400/jdc.2019.17.7.157 · Cited by 3
Estudo exploratório da usabilidade do serviço «e-fatura» com o cidadão sénior
Macedo, T. G. F., Veloso, A. I., & Costa, L. V. (2019) · Páginas a&b Arquivos & Bibliotecas · doi:10.21747/21836671/pagespa4 · Cited by 1
Acceptance of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in a semi-rural population in South Africa
Chiwanza, F., Irwin, Y., & Dowse, R. (2020) · Health SA Gesondheid · doi:10.4102/hsag.v25i0.1336 · Cited by 1
Remote Home Healthcare Services and Tools for Supporting Aging in Place
Fournier, H., Molyneaux, H., & Kondratova, I. (2020) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-51828-8_117 · Cited by 1
Ruser, H., Kaltenbach, A., Mechold, L., Obee, F., & Piela, F. (2020) · Proceedings of IEEE Sensors/Proceedings of IEEE Sensors ... · doi:10.1109/sensors47125.2020.9278920 · Cited by 1
Smart Homes to Support the Wellness and Pleasurable Experience of Residents
Kim, M. J., Cho, M. E., & Jun, H. J. (2021) · Power systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-64915-9_5 · Cited by 1
(2016) · transcript Verlag eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783839429570 · Cited by 1
Maidhof, C., Offermann, J., & Ziefle, M. (2023) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-37496-8_6 · Cited by 1
McCall, T. (2020) · Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) · doi:10.17615/2ps7-1319 · Cited by 1
Leung, A. Y. M., & Xu, X. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-69892-2_1087-1 · Cited by 1
SoTRAACE for active security in Ambient Assisted LivingPreprint
Ferreira, A., Teles, S., & Vieira‐Marques, P. (2018) · doi:10.2196/preprints.10119 · Cited by 1
AIoT for aging in place: from theory to practice
Zhang, H. (2024) · DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) · doi:10.32657/10356/175547 · Cited by 1
Hedima, E. W., & Okoro, R. N. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4445385/v1 · Cited by 1
Connaissances, pratiques et acceptabilité des gérontechnologies à La Réunion
Klein, A. (2017) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/d331a3eczf24az465dz9b58za08d0f84c1b7 · Cited by 1
Aïssaoui, D. (2018) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/1fbe0e55z8feaz4ed8zae72z07353fb02bd3 · Cited by 1
Besoins d'assistance technologique par des personnes âgées et leurs aidantsPreprint
Dupuy, L., Sauzeon, H., & Consel, C. (2015) · HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)
Zhou, M., Herselman, M. E., & Coleman, A. (2016) · International Conference on eHealth, Telemedicine, and Social Medicine
The Role of MHealth and Wearables for Anticipation in Medicine
Ferng, A. S., Punwani, V., & Gaglani, S. M. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45142-8_10
Aging, Cognition, and Technology Systems
Taha, J., & Czaja, S. J. (2017) · Health informatics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-51732-2_12
Technologieacceptatie en -implementatie
Wouters, E., van der Zijpp, T. J., & Nieboer, M. E. (2017) · Bohn Stafleu van Loghum eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-90-368-1073-9_8
Self-citationVos, J. (2017) · Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln) · doi:10.24385/lincoln.24325780
Trusted Autonomy in Training: A Future Scenario
Young, L. (2018) · Studies in systems, decision and control · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-64816-3_19
Assisted living technologies and the consumer market: how is it developing?
Ward, G., Winchcombe, M., & Teah, G. E. (2018) · Journal of Enabling Technologies · doi:10.1108/jet-01-2018-0002
Lessons Learned: Engaging Older Adults in Generative Design Sessions for a Digital Messaging System
Edugyan, A., Papallas, A., & Zaphiris, P. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-91743-6_29
Supporting the Development of Assistive Systems for Older People
Haslwanter, J. D. H., & Garschall, M. (2018) · International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (PETRA) · doi:10.1145/3197768.3201551
Review of Telecare Technologies for Older People
Haslwanter, J. D. H. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-94274-2_58
De la percepción a la imitación en la accesibilidad de adultos mayores en interfaces web
Gómez, J. D. G. (2017) · Arquetipo · doi:10.31908/22159444.3679
Santos, F. D. S. (2018) · Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (Universidade de São Paulo) · doi:10.11606/d.55.2018.tde-12112018-163133
McGrath, C., Molinaro, M. L., Sheldrake, E., Rudman, D. L., & Astell, A. J. (2019) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/1609406919831833
mHealth Use in Older People with Heart Failure
Cajita, M. (2017)
Nutritional telemonitoring for community-dwelling older adults : Feasibility and effectiveness
Atten, M. N. V. D.-V. (2019) · doi:10.18174/471933
The Challenges of Urban Ageing
van Hoof, J., Kazak, J. K., Perek-Białas, J. M., & Peek, S. T. M. (2018)
Self-citationZou, X. (2019) · International Conference on Economy, Management and Entrepreneurship (ICOEME) · doi:10.2991/icoeme-19.2019.74
Understanding Family and Health Professionals
Palmeiras, G. D. B., Pelzer, M. T., Pasqualotti, A., & Pasqualotti, P. R. (2019) · Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI) · doi:10.23919/cisti.2019.8760667
Influence of Assistive Technology for the Maintenance of the Functionality of Elderly People
Leite, E. D. S., Rodrigues, T. P., do Carmo, M., de Farias, A. D., Adelaide, M., Moreira, S. P., Bittencourt, G. K. G. D., Bittencourt, D., de Oliveira, F. B., Simpson, C. A., et al. (2016)
Aide-mémoire externe et vieillissement : bien plus qu’une aide pour se rappeler
Porcher, A., Beaurain, C., & Sinoquet, M. (2019) · Gérontologie et société · doi:10.3917/gs1.160.0061
The use of novel technology to deliver falls prevention exercise to older adults
Howes, S. C. (2018) · Ulster University Research Portal (Ulster University)
‘e-fatura’ - Estudo misto com participantes Seniores num projeto Municipal em Viseu
Barbosa, M. M., & Veloso, A. I. (2020) · Páginas a&b Arquivos & Bibliotecas · doi:10.21747/21836671/pag2020a12
Assisting Elderly Non-computer-Literate People with Computer-Based Communications
Osório, A. J. (2019) · Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-60013-0_63-1
Wilkowska, W., Offermann, J., & Ziefle, M. (2020) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-52677-1_2 · Cited by 1
Advisory on Ambient Assisted Living Solutions: Towards an Advisor Concept and Training Curriculum
de Sousa, R. T., Teles, S., Bertel, D., Schmitter, P., & Abrantes, D. (2020) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-52677-1_3
Different Explanation, less frustration?
Jie, L.-J. (2020) · doi:10.26481/dis.20200409jj
PUSHING THE BOUNDARIES OF CONSUMER GRADE WEARABLE DEVICES IN HEALTH CARE FOR OLDER ADULTS
Kim, B. Y. (2020) · UWSpace (University of Waterloo)
Grustam, A. S. (2018) · RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam)
Memoria visual en la tercera edad. Regularidades para el diseño de interfaces
Pérez, M., Morales, L. G., Coromina-Hernández, J. C., Álvarez-González, M. Á., Serrano, R. B., & Manzanero, A. L. (2020) · Revista Científica de Ingeniería Industrial
Design of an Augmented Reality Health Activity Platform for Older Adults Living in Long-Term Care
Lefebvre, P. (2021) · uO Research (University of Ottawa) · doi:10.20381/ruor-26077
Measuring the Impact of Active and Assisted Living (AAL) Solutions
Aigner-Walder, B., Luger, A., & Himmelsbach, J. (2021) · International handbooks of quality-of-life · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58031-5_17
Jacobs, M. N. (2021) · University of the Western Cape Electronic Theses and Dissertations Repository (University of the Western Cape)
Wouters, E., & Aarts, S. (2016) · PodoSophia · doi:10.1007/s12481-016-0116-7
Self-citationOffermann, J., Wilkowska, W., Laurentius, T., Bollheimer, L. C., & Ziefle, M. (2020) · JMIR Aging · doi:10.2196/21254
Online community care platforms for older adults
Willard, S. (2021) · Research Publications (Maastricht University) · doi:10.26481/dis.20211202sw
Kollewe, C. (2021) · Alter(n) und Gesellschaft · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-31547-4_15
Veirman, A. E. M. D., Thewissen, V., Spruijt, M. G., & Bolman, C. A. W. (2021) · doi:10.2196/preprints.34754
Madisetti, M., Newman, J. C., Butcher, M. C., Pittman, M., Qanungo, S., & Kelechi, T. J. (2021) · doi:10.2196/preprints.29391
Leung, A. Y. M., & Xu, X. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-22009-9_1087
Tavares, J., & Oliveira, T. (2018) · doi:10.2196/preprints.11032
Patient-centric portable health record exchange: A feasibility study (Preprint)Preprint
Ozols, A., Luskin, E., & Buehrens, P. (2018) · doi:10.2196/preprints.11033
Assisting Elderly Non-computer-Literate People with Computer-Based Communications
Osório, A. J. (2020) · Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-10576-1_63
Baer, N.-R., Vietzke, J., & Schenk, L. (2021) · doi:10.2196/preprints.27583
Aging and Technology: What is the Take Home Message for Newspapers Readers
Wolbring, G., & Abdullah, B. (2016) · transcript Verlag eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783839429570-013
Elers, P., Hunter, I. M., Whiddett, D., Lockhart, C. A., Guesgen, H. W., & Singh, A. S. G. (2018) · doi:10.2196/preprints.10741
Itoh, S., Watanabe, K., Miwa, H., Ikeuchi, T., & Wakui, T. (2022) · Studies in health technology and informatics · doi:10.3233/shti220295
Identifying User Preferences of Data Handling Using Assisting Technologies
Offermann, J., Wilkowska, W., & Ziefle, M. (2022) · International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (PETRA) · doi:10.1145/3529190.3529196
Principles’ Parametrization to Assert the Usability Compliance Level of AAL Ecosystems
Romeiro, C., & Araújo, P. (2022) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-2397-5_10
Smart Home Technology for the Elderly : Adaptation to the User Needs and Acceptance Framework
Yu, J. Y. (2022) · UPM Digital Archive (Technical University of Madrid) · doi:10.20868/upm.thesis.71610
Advancements in Health Care Communication
Yang, A., & Lebedoff, S. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-12063-3_8
Impact of Individual Differences on the Adoption of Smart Homes
Lawati, B. A., & Fang, X. (2022) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-19682-9_58
Rodríguez-Domínguez, M. T., Bazago-Dómine, M. I. I., Jiménez-Palomares, M., Nuñez-Trujillo, P. M., Pérez-González, G., Santano‐Mogena, E., Barriga-Talavera, C., & Garrido-Ardila, E. M. (2023) · doi:10.2196/preprints.45459
Metadata
- Authors
- Peek, S. T. M., Wouters, E. J. M., van Hoof, J., Luijkx, K. G., Boeije, H. R., & Vrijhoef, H. J. M.
- Affiliations
- Tilburg University (NL)
- Fontys University of Applied Sciences (NL)
- Utrecht University (NL)
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- Corresponding author
- Peek, Sebastiaan T.M.
- ORCID
- Venue
- International Journal of Medical Informatics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-04
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 235-248
- ISSN
- 1386-5056 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2105499459
- Cited by
- 1,206
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 159 · 2025: 117 · 2024: 95 · 2023: 120 · 2022: 105 · 2021: 120 · 2020: 129 · 2019: 91 · 2018: 103 · 2017: 70 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 10
- FWCI
- 19.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Medical Informatics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (acceptedVersion)
- Research portal (Tilburg University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science (OCW) (PRO-3-37)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Technology Use by Older Adults
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
- Keywords
- technology acceptance, aging in place, community-dwelling older adults, electronic health technology, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, privacy concerns, usability, social influence, family caregivers, safety technology, technology adoption
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Attitude to Computers, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Technology Assessment, Biomedical, Independent Living
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
