The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: A systematic review
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: To provide an overview of factors influencing the acceptance of electronic technologies that support aging in place by community-dwelling older adults. Since technology acceptance factors fluctuate over time, a distinction was made between factors in the pre-implementation stage and factors in the post-implementation stage. METHODS: A systematic review of mixed studies. Seven major scientific databases (including MEDLINE, Scopus and CINAHL) were searched. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) original and peer-reviewed research, (2) qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods research, (3) research in which participants are community-dwelling older adults aged 60 years or older, and (4) research aimed at investigating factors that influence the intention to use or the actual use of electronic technology for aging in place. Three researchers each read the articles and extracted factors. RESULTS: Sixteen out of 2841 articles were included. Most articles investigated acceptance of technology that enhances safety or provides social interaction. The majority of data was based on qualitative research investigating factors in the pre-implementation stage. Acceptance in this stage is influenced by 27 factors, divided into six themes: concerns regarding technology (e.g., high cost, privacy implications and usability factors); expected benefits of technology (e.g., increased safety and perceived usefulness); need for technology (e.g., perceived need and subjective health status); alternatives to technology (e.g., help by family or spouse), social influence (e.g., influence of family, friends and professional caregivers); and characteristics of older adults (e.g., desire to age in place). When comparing these results to qualitative results on post-implementation acceptance, our analysis showed that some factors are persistent while new factors also emerge. Quantitative results showed that a small number of variables have a significant influence in the pre-implementation stage. Fourteen out of the sixteen included articles did not use an existing technology acceptance framework or model. CONCLUSIONS: Acceptance of technology in the pre-implementation stage is influenced by multiple factors. However, post-implementation research on technology acceptance by community-dwelling older adults is scarce and most of the factors in this review have not been tested by using quantitative methods. Further research is needed to determine if and how the factors in this review are interrelated, and how they relate to existing models of technology acceptance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Some older adults will perceive a technology as being more relevant for other elderly people with more extensive functional impairments56 and be less motivated to use it themselves.”
From Usability and acceptability of technology for community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic literature review (2018) · cites this paper as [56]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Engaging older adults in a preimplementation study thus risks obtaining a “prototypical result,” according to Peek et al (2014).56”
From Usability and acceptability of technology for community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic literature review (2018) · cites this paper as [56]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This is in line with Peek et al (2014, p. 242), who found that a perceived personal need for technology was the most frequent factor mentioned for technology use and acceptance.56”
From Usability and acceptability of technology for community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic literature review (2018) · cites this paper as [56]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203710753-35 · Cited by 37,670
Valente, T. W. (2003) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.gim.0000061743.67794.c4 · Cited by 20,559
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41410412 · Cited by 15,756
Revisiting the Behavioral Model and Access to Medical Care: Does it Matter?
Andersen, R. M. (1995) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2137284 · Cited by 9,831
Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-8-45 · Cited by 9,312
Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model
Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00143-4 · Cited by 4,250
Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W., & Chervany, N. L. (1999) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249751 · Cited by 3,833
A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model
King, W. R., & He, J. (2006) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2006.05.003 · Cited by 2,906
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 999
Cuesta, M., Millberg, L. G., Karlsson, S., & Arvidsson, S. (2020) · International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being · doi:10.1080/17482631.2020.1835138 · Cited by 26
Ehrari, H., Ulrich, F., & Andersen, H. B. (2020) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.04711 · Cited by 27
Döring, N. M., Mikhailova, V., Brandenburg, K., Broll, W., Groß, H., Werner, S., & Raake, A. (2022) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-022-00957-w · Cited by 34
Jaschinski, C. (2014) · ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp) · doi:10.1145/2638728.2638838 · Cited by 26
Vaziri, D. D., Giannouli, E., Frisiello, A., Kaartinen, N., Wieching, R., Schreiber, D., & Wulf, V. (2019) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2019.1637457 · Cited by 26
E-Health Interventions for Older Adults With Frailty: A Systematic Review
Han, H.-W., Park, S.-W., Kim, D. Y., Lee, B.-S., Kim, D., Jeon, N., & Yang, Y.-J. (2023) · Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.5535/arm.23090 · Cited by 26
Jiang, Y.-S., Shi, H., Kang, Y., Shen, J., Li, J., Cui, J., Pang, J., Zhang, C., & Zhang, J. (2023) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-023-04089-5 · Cited by 25
Almulhem, J. A. (2023) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare11233024 · Cited by 30
Tobis, S., Cylkowska-Nowak, M., Wieczorowska–Tobis, K., Pawlaczyk, M., & Suwalska, A. (2017) · Occupational Therapy International · doi:10.1155/2017/9592405 · Cited by 25
Zwierenberg, E., Nap, H. H., Lukkien, D., Cornelisse, L., Finnema, E., Dijkstra, A., Hagedoorn, M., & Sanderman, R. (2018) · Gerontechnology · doi:10.4017/gt.2018.17.4.001.00 · Cited by 24
Nysveen, H., Pedersen, P. E., & Skard, S. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.01.014 · Cited by 25
Tural, E., Lu, D., & Cole, D. A. (2020) · Preventive Medicine Reports · doi:10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101082 · Cited by 26
A Study of eHealth from the Perspective of Social Sciences
Uribe-Toril, J., Ruiz–Real, J. L., & Soriano, B. J. N. (2021) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare9020108 · Cited by 27
Gaugler, J. E., Zmora, R., Mitchell, L. L., Finlay, J., Rosebush, C. E., Nkimbeng, M. J., Baker, Z. G., Albers, E. A., & Peterson, C. (2021) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-021-02634-8 · Cited by 29
Can Smart Home Technology Deliver on the Promise of Independent Living?
Peek, S. T. M., Aarts, S., & Wouters, E. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-01904-8_41-2 · Cited by 26
Self-citationHartzler, A. L., Osterhage, K. P., Demiris, G., Phelan, E. A., Thielke, S. M., & Turner, A. M. (2017) · Informatics for Health and Social Care · doi:10.1080/17538157.2017.1297815 · Cited by 28
Atten, M. N. V. D.-V., de Groot, C. P. G. M., Romea, A. C., Schwartz, S., de Vries, J. H. M., & Haveman‐Nies, A. (2018) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s1368980018002185 · Cited by 25
Living With Intelligent Sensors
Galambos, C. M., Rantz, M., Craver, A., Bongiorno, M., Pelts, M. D., Holik, A. J., & Jun, J. S. (2019) · CIN Computers Informatics Nursing · doi:10.1097/cin.0000000000000555 · Cited by 25
IT Skills of Young and Older People: A Qualitative Study
Haase, M., Bosse, M., Sackmann, S., & Meyer, G. (2024) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2319916 · Cited by 26
Sestino, A., & D’Angelo, A. (2024) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123526 · Cited by 24
Understanding Privacy and Trust in Smart Home Environments
Schomakers, E.-M., Biermann, H., & Ziefle, M. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-50309-3_34 · Cited by 25
Latendorf, A., Runde, L. M., Salminen, T., & Steinert, A. (2020) · Aging Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1007/s40520-020-01668-z · Cited by 24
Wilkowska, W., Offermann, J., Laurentius, T., Bollheimer, L. C., & Ziefle, M. (2021) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.653931 · Cited by 26
Bhidayasiri, R., Maytharakcheep, S., Phumphid, S., & Maetzler, W. (2022) · Journal of the Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jns.2022.120197 · Cited by 24
Getting Connected to M-Health Technologies through a Meta-Analysis
Calegari, L. P., Tortorella, G. L., & Fettermann, D. C. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20054369 · Cited by 27
The Role of Technology Acceptance in Healthcare to Mitigate COVID-19 Outbreak
AlQudah, A. A., Salloum, S. A., & Shaalan, K. F. (2021) · Studies in systems, decision and control · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-67716-9_14 · Cited by 25
Kramer, L. L., Mulder, B. C., van Velsen, L., & de Vet, E. (2021) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/22186 · Cited by 23
What Determines the Acceptance and Use of eHealth by Older Adults in Poland?
Rój, J. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph192315643 · Cited by 23
Colombo, G., Minta, K., Grübel, J., Tai, W. L. E., Hölscher, C., & Schinazi, V. R. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2024.108349 · Cited by 25
Bluethmann, S. M., Coa, K. I., Alfano, C. M., & Hesse, B. W. (2018) · Current Oncology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11912-018-0674-1 · Cited by 23
Privacy Perceptions in Ambient Assisted Living
Schomakers, E.-M., & Ziefle, M. (2019) · International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health (ICT4AWE) · doi:10.5220/0007719802050212 · Cited by 23
Users’ acceptance of electronic patient portals in Lebanon
Honein-AbouHaidar, G. N., Antoun, J., Badr, K., Hlais, S., & Nazaretian, H. (2020) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-020-1047-x · Cited by 27
Mazuz, K., Biswas, S., & Lindner, U. (2020) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2020.00011 · Cited by 24
Scientometric Analysis of Global Scientific Literature on Aging in Place
Oladinrin, O. T., Gomis, K., Jayantha, W. M., Obi, L. I., & Rana, M. Q. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph182312468 · Cited by 23
Tu, J.-C., Luo, S.-C., Lee, Y.-L., Shih, M.-F., & Chiu, S.-P. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19106059 · Cited by 23
Older adults' experiences using Alexa
Orlofsky, S., & Wozniak, K. (2022) · Geriatric Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.gerinurse.2022.09.017 · Cited by 24
Lorusso, L., Mošmondor, M., Grgurić, A., Toccafondi, L., D’Onofrio, G., Russo, S., Lampe, J., Pihl, T., Mayer, N., Vignani, G., et al. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23020797 · Cited by 23
Discovering Design Principles for Health Behavioral Change Support Systems
Al-Ramahi, M. A., Liu, J., & El-Gayar, O. (2017) · ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3055534 · Cited by 23
Völter, C., Schirmer, C., Hinsen, D., Roeber, M., Dazert, S., & Bilda, K. (2020) · JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies · doi:10.2196/15843 · Cited by 23
Soubutts, E., Ayobi, A., Eardley, R., McNaney, R., Cater, K., & O'Kane, A. A. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3555193 · Cited by 23
Impact of Aging on Consumer Behavior: A Review and Research Agenda
Zheng, Z., M, H. B. A., Zaki, H. O., & Tan, Q. L. (2024) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.70000 · Cited by 22
Hedima, E. W., & Okoro, R. N. (2025) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-025-13387-0 · Cited by 23
Mellikeche, S., Marín, H. D. F., Benítez, S., de Lira, A. C. O., de Quirós, F. G. B., & Patrice Degoulet, A. (2019) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.07.006 · Cited by 26
Advancing health information technology roadmaps in long term care
Alexander, G. L., Georgiou, A., Doughty, K., Hornblow, A. R., Livingstone, A., Dougherty, M., Jacobs, S. D., & Fisk, M. J. (2020) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104088 · Cited by 22
Hunter, I. M., Elers, P., Lockhart, C. A., Guesgen, H. W., Singh, A. S. G., & Whiddett, D. (2020) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/24157 · Cited by 21
On the Use of Movement-Based Interaction with Smart Textiles for Emotion Regulation
Jiang, M., Nanjappan, V., ten Bhömer, M., & Liang, H. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21030990 · Cited by 23
Utilization, Determinants, and Prospects of Electronic Medical Records in Ethiopia
Oumer, A., Muhye, A., Dagne, I., Ishak, N., Ale, A., & Bekele, A. (2021) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2021/2230618 · Cited by 25
Frishammar, J., Essén, A., Simms, C., Edblad, R., & Hardebro, V. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2022.3187792 · Cited by 22
McCall, T., Foster, M. L., & Schwartz, T. A. (2023) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/45766 · Cited by 22
Older People with Access to Hand-Held Devices: Who Are They?
Shahrokni, A., Mahmoudzadeh, S., Saeedi, R., & Ghasemzadeh, H. G. (2015) · Telemedicine Journal and e-Health · doi:10.1089/tmj.2014.0103 · Cited by 22
Feasibility and Effectiveness of Nutritional Telemonitoring for Home Care Clients: A Pilot Study
Atten, M. N. V. D.-V., Haveman‐Nies, A., Heery, D., de Vries, J. H. M., & de Groot, C. P. G. M. (2018) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/gny059 · Cited by 23
Rosenwohl‐Mack, A., Schumacher, K. L., Fang, M.-L. E., & Fukuoka, Y. (2018) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-018-0820-8 · Cited by 22
Ming, Y., Li, Y., & Liu, Y. (2025) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1416968 · Cited by 21
Investigating the attitude of patients with chronic diseases about using mobile health
Abbasi, R., Zare, S., & Ahmadian, L. (2020) · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · doi:10.1017/s0266462320000070 · Cited by 22
Cloud manufacturing: a myth or future of global manufacturing?
Aziz, M. H., Qamar, S., Khasawneh, M. T., & Saha, C. K. (2020) · Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management · doi:10.1108/jmtm-10-2019-0379 · Cited by 20
Halvorsrud, L., Holthe, T., Karterud, D., Thorstensen, E., & Lund, A. D. (2021) · Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology · doi:10.1080/17483107.2021.1906962 · Cited by 21
Yang, D., & Moody, L. (2021) · Fashion Practice · doi:10.1080/17569370.2021.1938823 · Cited by 27
Arthanat, S., Wilcox, J., & LaRoche, D. P. (2022) · Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology · doi:10.1080/17483107.2022.2125088 · Cited by 24
Bhowmick, P., & Stolterman, E. (2023) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3544549.3585722 · Cited by 23
Attitudes Towards Aging and the Acceptance of ICT for Aging in Place
Schomakers, E.-M., Offermann, J., & Ziefle, M. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-92034-4_12 · Cited by 22
Esteban-Vasallo, M. D., Domínguez‐Berjón, M. F., García‐Riolobos, C., Zoni, A. C., Torres, J. L. A., Perruca, L. S., & Astray‐Mochales, J. (2019) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.07.062 · Cited by 21
App‐based attention training: Incorporating older adults’ feedback to facilitate home‐based use
Hill, N. L., Mogle, J. A., Wion, R. K., Kitt-Lewis, E. A., Hannan, J., Dick, R., & Madrigal, C. B. (2017) · International Journal of Older People Nursing · doi:10.1111/opn.12163 · Cited by 21
Buja, A., Grotto, G., Taha, M., Cocchio, S., & Baldo, V. (2023) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines11071274 · Cited by 24
Leung, W. K. C., Yau, C. Y. C., & Lam, S. C. (2025) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-025-06010-8 · Cited by 20
Benoit-Dubé, L., Jean, E. K., Aguilar, M. A., Zuniga, A.-M., Bier, N., Couture, M., Lussier, M., Lajoie, X., & Belchior, P. D. C. (2020) · Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology · doi:10.1080/17483107.2020.1844320 · Cited by 20
Acceptance and perception of wearable technologies: A survey on Brazilian and European companies
Schwambach, G. C. S., López, Ó. H., Sott, M. K., Tedesco, L. P., & Molz, R. F. (2021) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101840 · Cited by 20
Camp, N., Johnston, J., Lewis, M. G. C., Zecca, M., Nuovo, A. G. D., Hunter, K. A., & Magistro, D. (2022) · JMIR Aging · doi:10.2196/33714 · Cited by 20
Mohadis, H. M., Ali, N. M., & Smeaton, A. F. (2016) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2016.1211737 · Cited by 20
Broendum, E., Ulrik, C. S., Gregersen, T. L., Hansen, E. F., Green, A., & Ringbæk, T. (2016) · Health Informatics Journal · doi:10.1177/1460458216667166 · Cited by 20
Why do few assistive technology systems make it to market? The case of the HandyHelper project
Haslwanter, J. D. H., & Fitzpatrick, G. (2016) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-016-0499-3 · Cited by 20
Making Pervasive Computing Technology Pervasive for Health & Wellness in Aging
Kaye, J. A. (2017) · Public Policy & Aging Report · doi:10.1093/ppar/prx005 · Cited by 20
Antecedents and consequences of social networking site knowledge sharing by seniors
Chang, I., Chang, C., Lian, J.-W., & Wang, M.-W. (2018) · Library Hi Tech · doi:10.1108/lht-11-2016-0144 · Cited by 20
Liao, J., Xiao, H.-Y., Li, X., Shu-hua, S., Liu, S., Yang, Y., & Xu, D. R. (2020) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/14969 · Cited by 22
Malinowsky, C. W., Kottorp, A., Patomella, A., Rosenberg, L., & Nygård, L. (2015) · Technology and Disability · doi:10.3233/tad-150431 · Cited by 19
“So, Tell Me What Kind of a Thing It Really Is”—Finnish Older Adults Making Sense of Home Technology
Lantela, P. (2019) · Journal of Media Literacy Education · doi:10.23860/jmle-2019-11-2-8 · Cited by 25
Fowler‐Davis, S., Barnett, D., Kelley, J. F., & Curtis, D. (2019) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-190844 · Cited by 20
Shah, K. P., Triana, A. J., Gusdorf, R. E., McCoy, A. B., Pabla, B., Scoville, E., Dalal, R. L., Beaulieu, D. B., Schwartz, D. A., Griffith, M. L., et al. (2021) · Inflammatory Bowel Diseases · doi:10.1093/ibd/izab068 · Cited by 19
Wang, A. H., Newman, K., Martin, L. S., & Lapum, J. L. (2022) · Dementia · doi:10.1177/14713012211073440 · Cited by 22
Wilkowska, W., Offermann, J., Spinsante, S., Poli, A., & Ziefle, M. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0269642 · Cited by 22
Technology and aging: the jigsaw puzzle of design, development and distribution
Lee, C. (2022) · Nature Aging · doi:10.1038/s43587-022-00325-6 · Cited by 26
Picco, A., Stuiver, A., de Winter, J., & de Waard, D. (2022) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2022.10.021 · Cited by 18
Care managers’ perceptions of eHomecare: a qualitative interview study
Åkerlind, C., Martin, L., & Gustafsson, C. (2017) · European Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1080/13691457.2017.1366893 · Cited by 19
Chen, S. C.-I. (2018) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.8977 · Cited by 19
Integrating an openEHR-based personalized virtual model for the ageing population within HBase
Kalogiannis, S., Δελτούζος, Κ., Zacharaki, E. I., Vasilakis, A. A., Μουστάκας, Κ., Ellul, J., & Megalooikonomou, V. (2019) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-019-0745-8 · Cited by 19
A dual-factor theory of WTs adoption in aged care service operations – a cross-country analysis
Khaksar, S. M. S., Jahanshahi, A. A., Slade, B., & Asian, S. (2020) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp-10-2018-0449 · Cited by 19
Bernstein, J. P. K., Dorociak, K. E., Mattek, N., Leese, M. I., Beattie, Z., Kaye, J. A., & Hughes, A. M. (2021) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-210049 · Cited by 18
Touzery, S. H., Dolničar, V., & Prevodnik, K. (2022) · Health & Social Care in the Community · doi:10.1111/hsc.13840 · Cited by 24
Haslwanter, J. D. H., Neureiter, K., & Garschall, M. (2018) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-018-0626-4 · Cited by 18
Laitinen, A., Niemelä, M., Pirhonen, J., & Philosophy Documentation Center (2019) · Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology · doi:10.5840/techne20191127108 · Cited by 19
Chamorro, L. S., Toebosch, R., & Lallemand, C. (2024) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3643834.3661513 · Cited by 18
Designing and Evaluating IT Applications for Informal Caregivers: Scoping Review
Premanandan, S., Ahmad, A., Cajander, Å., Ågerfalk, P. J., & van Gemert‐Pijnen, J. E. W. C. (2024) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/57393 · Cited by 23
Designing batteryless wearables for hospitalized older people
Jayatilaka, A., Dang, Q. H., Chen, S. J., Visvanathan, R., Fumeaux, C., & Ranasinghe, D. C. (2019) · International Symposium on Wearable Computers · doi:10.1145/3341163.3347740 · Cited by 18
m-SFT: A Novel Mobile Health System to Assess the Elderly Physical Condition
Ureña, R., Chiclana, F., González, Á., Herrera‐Viedma, E., & Moral-Muñoz, J. A. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20051462 · Cited by 21
Holthe, T., Halvorsrud, L., & Lund, A. D. (2020) · Journal of Occupational Science · doi:10.1080/14427591.2020.1758200 · Cited by 17
Gu, T., Li, D., & Li, L. (2020) · Journal of Healthcare Engineering · doi:10.1155/2020/1840543 · Cited by 18
Schouten, A., Blumenberg, E., Wachs, M., & King, H. (2021) · Journal of the American Planning Association · doi:10.1080/01944363.2021.1907608 · Cited by 18
Li, S. (2023) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2023.103689 · Cited by 19
Mujirishvili, T., Fedosov, A., Hashemifard, K., Climent-Pérez, P., & Florez-Revuelta, F. (2024) · Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642164 · Cited by 18
Xiong, C., Astell, A. J., Mihailidis, A., & Colantonio, A. (2018) · Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering · doi:10.1177/2055668318775315 · Cited by 19
HomeAssist: An Assisted Living Platform for Aging in Place Based on an Interdisciplinary Approach
Consel, C., Dupuy, L., & Sauzeon, H. (2017) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-60483-1_14 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Peek, S. T. M., Wouters, E. J. M., van Hoof, J., Luijkx, K. G., Boeije, H. R., & Vrijhoef, H. J. M.
- Affiliations
- Tilburg University (NL)
- Fontys University of Applied Sciences (NL)
- Utrecht University (NL)
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- Corresponding author
- Peek, Sebastiaan T.M.
- ORCID
- Venue
- International Journal of Medical Informatics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-04
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 235-248
- ISSN
- 1386-5056 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2105499459
- Cited by
- 1,206
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 159 · 2025: 117 · 2024: 95 · 2023: 120 · 2022: 105 · 2021: 120 · 2020: 129 · 2019: 91 · 2018: 103 · 2017: 70 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 10
- FWCI
- 19.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Medical Informatics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (acceptedVersion)
- Research portal (Tilburg University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science (OCW) (PRO-3-37)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Technology Use by Older Adults
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
- Keywords
- technology acceptance, aging in place, community-dwelling older adults, electronic health technology, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, privacy concerns, usability, social influence, family caregivers, safety technology, technology adoption
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Attitude to Computers, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Technology Assessment, Biomedical, Independent Living
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
