The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: A systematic review
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: To provide an overview of factors influencing the acceptance of electronic technologies that support aging in place by community-dwelling older adults. Since technology acceptance factors fluctuate over time, a distinction was made between factors in the pre-implementation stage and factors in the post-implementation stage. METHODS: A systematic review of mixed studies. Seven major scientific databases (including MEDLINE, Scopus and CINAHL) were searched. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) original and peer-reviewed research, (2) qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods research, (3) research in which participants are community-dwelling older adults aged 60 years or older, and (4) research aimed at investigating factors that influence the intention to use or the actual use of electronic technology for aging in place. Three researchers each read the articles and extracted factors. RESULTS: Sixteen out of 2841 articles were included. Most articles investigated acceptance of technology that enhances safety or provides social interaction. The majority of data was based on qualitative research investigating factors in the pre-implementation stage. Acceptance in this stage is influenced by 27 factors, divided into six themes: concerns regarding technology (e.g., high cost, privacy implications and usability factors); expected benefits of technology (e.g., increased safety and perceived usefulness); need for technology (e.g., perceived need and subjective health status); alternatives to technology (e.g., help by family or spouse), social influence (e.g., influence of family, friends and professional caregivers); and characteristics of older adults (e.g., desire to age in place). When comparing these results to qualitative results on post-implementation acceptance, our analysis showed that some factors are persistent while new factors also emerge. Quantitative results showed that a small number of variables have a significant influence in the pre-implementation stage. Fourteen out of the sixteen included articles did not use an existing technology acceptance framework or model. CONCLUSIONS: Acceptance of technology in the pre-implementation stage is influenced by multiple factors. However, post-implementation research on technology acceptance by community-dwelling older adults is scarce and most of the factors in this review have not been tested by using quantitative methods. Further research is needed to determine if and how the factors in this review are interrelated, and how they relate to existing models of technology acceptance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Some older adults will perceive a technology as being more relevant for other elderly people with more extensive functional impairments56 and be less motivated to use it themselves.”
From Usability and acceptability of technology for community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic literature review (2018) · cites this paper as [56]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Engaging older adults in a preimplementation study thus risks obtaining a “prototypical result,” according to Peek et al (2014).56”
From Usability and acceptability of technology for community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic literature review (2018) · cites this paper as [56]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This is in line with Peek et al (2014, p. 242), who found that a perceived personal need for technology was the most frequent factor mentioned for technology use and acceptance.56”
From Usability and acceptability of technology for community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic literature review (2018) · cites this paper as [56]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203710753-35 · Cited by 37,670
Valente, T. W. (2003) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.gim.0000061743.67794.c4 · Cited by 20,559
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41410412 · Cited by 15,756
Revisiting the Behavioral Model and Access to Medical Care: Does it Matter?
Andersen, R. M. (1995) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2137284 · Cited by 9,831
Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-8-45 · Cited by 9,312
Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model
Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00143-4 · Cited by 4,250
Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W., & Chervany, N. L. (1999) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249751 · Cited by 3,833
A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model
King, W. R., & He, J. (2006) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2006.05.003 · Cited by 2,906
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 999
Soja, E. (2017) · Information Systems Management · doi:10.1080/10580530.2017.1366217 · Cited by 20
Gagnon‐Roy, M., Bier, N., Couture, M., Giroux, S., Pigot, H., Zarshenas, S., & Bottari, C. L. (2020) · Assistive Technology · doi:10.1080/10400435.2020.1809552 · Cited by 18
van Lieshout, R., Pisters, M. F., Vanwanseele, B., de Bie, R. A., Wouters, E., & Stukstette, M. J. P. M. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0165199 · Cited by 18
Self-citationJacobs, K., Kuhlmey, A., Greß, S., Klauber, J., Schwinger, A., & GmbH, S.-V. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-63107-2 · Cited by 18
Jo, H. S., Kim, J. H., & Kim, S. (2019) · 보건교육·건강증진학회지 · doi:10.14367/kjhep.2019.36.5.43 · Cited by 17
A Preference-Driven Smart Home Service for the Elderly’s Biophilic Experience
Lee, E. J., & Park, S.-J. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21155108 · Cited by 19
Huang, H., Chen, Z., Cao, S., Xiao, M., Xie, L., & Zhao, Q. (2021) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.687048 · Cited by 17
Yu, J., de Antonio, A., & Villalba‐Mora, E. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/31920 · Cited by 17
Bergschöld, J. M., Gunnes, M., Eide, A. H., & Lassemo, E. I. (2023) · JMIR Aging · doi:10.2196/50286 · Cited by 19
How are ICT used in the classroom? A study of teachers’ beliefs and uses
de Aldama, C., & Pozo, J. I. (2016) · Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology · doi:10.25115/ejrep.39.15062 · Cited by 53
eHomecare and safety: The experiences of older patients and their relatives
Åkerlind, C., Martin, L. M., & Gustafsson, C. (2017) · Geriatric Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.gerinurse.2017.08.004 · Cited by 17
McGrath, C., & Corrado, A. M. (2018) · British Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.1177/0308022618813247 · Cited by 17
Petrovčič, A., Peek, S. T. M., & Dolničar, V. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16091623 · Cited by 18
Self-citation(2016) · Science studies · doi:10.14361/9783839429570 · Cited by 19
Elkefi, S., Asan, O., Yu, Z., Yen, T. W. F., & Rowley, S. D. (2024) · Frontiers in Communication · doi:10.3389/fcomm.2024.1391981 · Cited by 19
Kearns, Á., & Kelly, H. (2022) · Aphasiology · doi:10.1080/02687038.2022.2030462 · Cited by 13
Yu, J., Huang, J., & Yang, Q. (2023) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare11172440 · Cited by 16
Barisch‐Fritz, B., Krafft, J., Rayling, S., Diener, J., Möller, T., Wunsch, K., Riedel, N., Maia, M., Weinberger, N., Lefint, J., et al. (2023) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076231218812 · Cited by 16
Lü, J., Bai, J., Zhao, H., & Zhang, X. (2023) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/43430 · Cited by 18
Hwang, H., Dutta, B., & Chang, H.-C. (2019) · Methods of Information in Medicine · doi:10.1055/s-0039-1695718 · Cited by 16
The Influence of Privacy on the Acceptance of Technologies for Assisted Living
Jaschinski, C., Allouch, S. B., Peters, O., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-50249-2_33 · Cited by 16
Colnar, S., Dimovski, V., Grah, B., Rogelj, V., & Bogataj, D. (2020) · International Conference on System Theory, Control and Computing (ICSTCC) · doi:10.1109/icstcc50638.2020.9259711 · Cited by 16
Willingness to Use Automated Vehicles: Results From a Large and Diverse Sample of U.S. Older Adults
Kadylak, T., Cotten, S., & Fennell, C. (2021) · Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine · doi:10.1177/2333721420987335 · Cited by 18
Client satisfaction with telehealth services in home health care agencies
Grant, L. A., Rockwood, T. H., & Stennes, L. (2015) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1177/1357633x14566589 · Cited by 16
Orellano-Colón, E. M., Jutai, J. W., Santiago, A., Torres, V., Benítez, K., & Torres, M. (2016) · Technologies · doi:10.3390/technologies4030021 · Cited by 16
The impact of media type on shared decision processes in third-age populations
Reychav, I., Najami, I., Raban, D. R., McHaney, R., & Azuri, J. (2018) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.01.004 · Cited by 17
Caroux, L., Consel, C., Dupuy, L., & Sauzeon, H. (2018) · Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments · doi:10.3233/ais-180505 · Cited by 16
Technik und Alter – Digitalisierung und die Ko-Konstitution von Alter(n) und Technologien
Kolland, F., Wanka, A., & Gallistl, V. (2019) · Springer Reference Sozialwissenschaften · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-09630-4_23-1 · Cited by 19
Dupuy, L., Micoulaud‐Franchi, J., & Philip, P. (2020) · Journal of Sleep Research · doi:10.1111/jsr.13094 · Cited by 16
Yaddaden, A., Spalla, G., Gouin-Vallerand, C., Briskie-Semeniuk, P., & Bier, N. (2022) · JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies · doi:10.2196/34983 · Cited by 17
Boccardi, V., Bahat, G., Balcı, C., Bourdel‐Marchasson, I., Christiaens, A., Donini, L. M., Çavdar, S., Maggi, S., Özkök, S., Pavić, T., et al. (2025) · European Geriatric Medicine · doi:10.1007/s41999-025-01168-1 · Cited by 15
Penno, E., & Gauld, R. D. C. (2017) · Health Systems & Reform · doi:10.1080/23288604.2017.1340927 · Cited by 15
Eicher, C., Kiselev, J., Brukamp, K., Kiemel, D., Spittel, S., Maier, A., Meyer, T., Oleimeulen, U., & Greuèl, M. (2019) · Technology and Disability · doi:10.3233/tad-190227 · Cited by 21
Rasi, P., Lindberg, J., & Airola, E. (2020) · Educational Gerontology · doi:10.1080/03601277.2020.1851861 · Cited by 14
Itoh, S., Miwa, H., Wu, X. V., Okuyama, A., Watanabe, K., Ikeuchi, T., & Wakui, T. (2021) · International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances · doi:10.1016/j.ijnsa.2021.100042 · Cited by 15
Patients' Acceptance of the Use of Serious Games in Physical Rehabilitation in Morocco
Bonnechère, B., Vooren, M. V., Jansen, B., Sint, J. S. V., Rahmoun, M., & Fourtassı, M. (2017) · Games for Health Journal · doi:10.1089/g4h.2017.0008 · Cited by 15
Older people and robotic technologies in the home
Petrie, H., & Darzentas, J. (2017) · International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (PETRA) · doi:10.1145/3056540.3056553 · Cited by 15
Technik, Pflegeinnovation und Implementierungsbedingungen
Zerth, J., Jaensch, P., & Müller, S. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-63107-2_11 · Cited by 15
Petzel, Z. W., & Sowerby, L. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2025.108563 · Cited by 23
A Literature Review of Digital Transformation in Healthcare
Ivančić, L., Glavan, L. M., & Vukšić, V. B. (2020) · International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics · doi:10.23919/mipro48935.2020.9245259 · Cited by 14
Alkhatib, S., Kelly, R., Waycott, J., Buchanan, G. R., Grobler, M. M., & Wang, S. (2021) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1093/iwc/iwab029 · Cited by 17
Technology for dementia care: benefits, opportunities and concerns
Bhargava, Y., & Baths, V. (2022) · Journal of Global Health Reports · doi:10.29392/001c.39606 · Cited by 14
The Shifting Sands of Labour: Changes in Shared Care Work with a Smart Home Health System
Soubutts, E., Czech, E., Ayobi, A., Eardley, R., Cater, K. F., & O’Kane, A. A. (2023) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581546 · Cited by 14
Moral, C., Pérez‐Rodríguez, R., Villalba‐Mora, E., Cortés, J. B., Ferré, X., & Rodríguez‐Mañas, L. (2023) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076231181229 · Cited by 14
Co-Creating a Digital Life-Integrated Self-Assessment for Older Adults: User Experience Study
Böttinger, M. J., Litz, E., Gordt, K., Jansen, C.-P., Memmer, N., Mychajliw, C., Radeck, L., Bauer, J. M., & Becker, C. (2023) · JMIR Aging · doi:10.2196/46738 · Cited by 15
Turner, N. R., & Berridge, C. W. (2023) · Informatics for Health and Social Care · doi:10.1080/17538157.2023.2252066 · Cited by 16
Alexa, I Do Not Want to Be Patronized
Horstmann, A. C., Schubert, T., Lambrich, L., & Strathmann, C. (2023) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA) · doi:10.1145/3570945.3607342 · Cited by 15
Liao, C.-W., Yao, K., Wang, C.-H., Hsieh, H.-H., Wang, I.-C., Ho, W., Huang, W.-L., & Huang, S.-H. (2025) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app15010461 · Cited by 14
Fakhimi, M. M., Hughes, A. M., & Gustavson, A. M. (2025) · Journal of Ageing and Longevity · doi:10.3390/jal5010003 · Cited by 14
Issues in the Development of AAL Systems
Haslwanter, J. D. H., & Fitzpatrick, G. (2017) · International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (PETRA) · doi:10.1145/3056540.3056554 · Cited by 15
Rural-Urban Comparison of Telehome Monitoring for Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Jaana, M., & Sherrard, H. (2018) · Telemedicine Journal and e-Health · doi:10.1089/tmj.2017.0303 · Cited by 14
Defining technology user needs of Indigenous older adults requiring dementia care
Starblanket, D., O’Connell, M. E., Gould, B., Jardine, M., Ferguson, M., & Bourassa, C. A. (2019) · Gerontechnology · doi:10.4017/gt.2019.18.3.002.00 · Cited by 14
Exploring intergenerational differences in technology-oriented ethical behavior
Verma, S., & Garg, N. (2022) · Kybernetes · doi:10.1108/k-09-2021-0897 · Cited by 14
Untangling factors influencing social networking sites use among older adults: a literature review
Chew, T. H., Chin, C. P.-Y., & Leau, Y. (2022) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-022-00874-y · Cited by 14
Interplay of Perceptions of Aging, Care, and Technology Acceptance in Older Age
Offermann, J., Wilkowska, W., & Ziefle, M. (2022) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2050542 · Cited by 14
Al-quaran, M., Geißler, D., Kamoen, C., Overdevest, N., van Lune, M., Weijers, I., & Gouveia, R. H. D. F. (2022) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3491101.3519803 · Cited by 14
Wan, X., Lighthall, N., & Xie, R. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107413 · Cited by 15
Smart Homes Supporting the Wellness of One or Two-Person Households
Cho, M. E., & Kim, M. J. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22207816 · Cited by 14
Unsupervised illness recognition via in-home monitoring by depth cameras
Vildjiounaite, E., Mäkelä, S.-M., Keränen, T., Kyllönen, V., Huotari, V., Järvinen, S., & Gimel’farb, G. (2016) · Pervasive and Mobile Computing · doi:10.1016/j.pmcj.2016.07.004 · Cited by 14
Katzman, W., Gladin, A., Lane, N., Wong, S., Liu, F., Jin, C.-S., & Fukuoka, Y. (2019) · JMIR Aging · doi:10.2196/12199 · Cited by 12
Song, Y.-J., & Chen, Y.-Y. (2019) · Australasian Journal on Ageing · doi:10.1111/ajag.12668 · Cited by 16
Acceptance of telerehabilitation in chronic pain: the patients' perspective
Cranen, K. (2018) · doi:10.3990/1.9789036545556 · Cited by 14
Sun, X., Shi, Y., Liu, C., Wang, S., Li, D., Zhu, X., Pan, K., Wang, H., & Zhang, H. (2025) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-025-13213-7 · Cited by 13
A study of the acceptability of smart homes to the future elderly in China
Zeng, F., & Chen, T.-L. (2022) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-022-00871-1 · Cited by 13
Kavčič, M., Petrovčič, A., & Dolničar, V. (2022) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2041898 · Cited by 13
Offermann, J., Wilkowska, W., Laurentius, T., Bollheimer, L. C., & Ziefle, M. (2024) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-023-04616-4 · Cited by 15
GerontoVis: Data Visualization at the Confluence of Aging
While, Z., Crouser, R. J., & Sarvghad, A. (2024) · Computer Graphics Forum · doi:10.1111/cgf.15101 · Cited by 16
Older Adults’ Adoption of Technology-Mediated Mobility Solutions: A Review and Agenda
Chua, C. S. W., Lim, W. M., & Teh, P. (2024) · Activities Adaptation & Aging · doi:10.1080/01924788.2024.2343605 · Cited by 14
Tham, N. A. Q., Brady, A., Ziefle, M., & Dinsmore, J. G. (2024) · Innovation in Aging · doi:10.1093/geroni/igae100 · Cited by 14
Sun, S., Qi, N., Li, H., & Liang, X. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1540201 · Cited by 13
Telecare acceptance as sticky entrapment: A realist review
Berge, M. S. (2016) · Gerontechnology · doi:10.4017/gt.2016.15.2.023.00 · Cited by 13
Offermann, J., Wilkowska, W., & Ziefle, M. (2020) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2020.1809247 · Cited by 13
Jönsson, F., Carson, D. B., Goicolea, I., & Hurtig, A. (2021) · International Journal of Health Policy and Management · doi:10.34172/ijhpm.2021.08 · Cited by 14
Evaluating Challenges and Adoption Factors for Active Assisted Living Smart Environments
Lam, L., Fadrique, L. X., Noon, G. B., Shah, A., & Morita, P. P. (2022) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2022.891634 · Cited by 16
Technology obsolescence across the adult lifespan in a USA internet sample
Gray, N., & Charness, N. H. (2022) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.1005822 · Cited by 13
Technology adoption and prediction tools for everyday technologies aimed at people with dementia
Chaurasia, P., McClean, S., Nugent, C., Cleland, I., Zhang, S., Donnelly, M., Scotney, B., Sanders, C., Smith, K. R., Norton, M., et al. (2016) · Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · doi:10.1109/embc.2016.7591704 · Cited by 12
Senior Citizens Usage Towards and Perception of Modern Technology in India
William, J. A., & Murugesh, R. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-92034-4_14 · Cited by 13
Seniors’ Appreciation of Humanoid Robots
Esposito, A. A., Cuciniello, M., Amorese, T., Esposito, A. M., Troncone, A., Maldonato, M. N., Vogel, C. M., Bourbakis, N., & Cordasco, G. (2019) · Smart innovation, systems and technologies · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-8950-4_30 · Cited by 13
Ashraf, A., Liu, J. H., & Rauf, Q. (2020) · International Conference on Computing and Data Engineering (ICCDE) · doi:10.1145/3379247.3379248 · Cited by 13
Jagtenberg, E. M., Kalmet, P. H. S., de Krom, M. A. P., Blokhuis, T. J., Seelen, H. A. M., & Poeze, M. (2020) · Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.2340/16501977-2721 · Cited by 13
Assche, M. V., Petrovic, M., Cambier, D., Calders, P., Gelder, P. V., & van de Velde, D. (2022) · Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology · doi:10.1080/17483107.2022.2075477 · Cited by 13
The social robot companion to support homecare nurses: The guardian study protocol
Margaritini, A., Benadduci, M., Amabili, G., Bonfigli, A. R., Luzi, R., Wac, K., Nap, H. H., Maranesi, E., & Bevilacqua, R. (2022) · Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications · doi:10.1016/j.conctc.2022.101024 · Cited by 12
Information and Communication Technologies in Primary Education: Teachers’ Perceptions in Greece
Aivazidi, M., & Michalakelis, C. (2023) · Informatics · doi:10.3390/informatics10030057 · Cited by 12
Understanding City 4.0: A Triple Bottom Line Approach
Yiğitcanlar, T., Xia, B., Cortese, T. T. P., & Sabatini‐Marques, J. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16010326 · Cited by 12
Rodríguez-Domínguez, M. T., Bazago-Dómine, M. I. I., Jiménez-Palomares, M., Pérez-González, G., Núñez, P., Santano‐Mogena, E., & Garrido-Ardila, E. M. (2024) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-024-01106-4 · Cited by 12
Assche, M. V., Petrović, M., Cambier, D. C., Calders, P., Gelder, P. V., Werner, F., & VELDE, D. V. D. (2024) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-024-01115-3 · Cited by 12
An Empirical Study on the Willingness of Young Elderly to Use Elderly Companion Robot
Sun, X., Chen, Z., & Jiang, Q. (2024) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2344918 · Cited by 12
A Synthesis of Technology Acceptance Research in Tourism & Hospitality
Pourfakhimi, S., Duncan, T., & Coetzee, W. (2018) · Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-72923-7_12 · Cited by 16
Assistive and wearable technology for elderly
Akbar, M. F., Ramadhani, N. A., & Putri, R. A. (2018) · Bulletin of Social Informatics Theory and Application · doi:10.31763/businta.v2i1.101 · Cited by 12
Telemonitoring readiness among Austrian diabetic patients: A cross-sectional validation study
Muigg, D., Duftschmid, G., Kästner, P., Modre‐Osprian, R., & Haluza, D. (2020) · Health Informatics Journal · doi:10.1177/1460458219894094 · Cited by 12
Factors influencing use of technology in older adults' daily life
Izadi-Avanji, F. S., Rahemi, Z., Adib‐Hajbaghery, M., & Yazdani-Darki, M. (2021) · International Archives of Health Sciences · doi:10.4103/iahs.iahs_14_21 · Cited by 11
Offermann, J., Wilkowska, W., Poli, A., Spinsante, S., & Ziefle, M. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21248297 · Cited by 14
Proceedings of the 4th IPLeiria’s International Health Congress
Romeiro, J., & Caldeira, S. (2018) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-018-3444-8 · Cited by 23
AboJabel, H., & Ayalon, L. (2023) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102386 · Cited by 14
Leite, E. D. S., Rodrigues, T. P., de Farias, M. D. C. A. D., Moreira, M. A. S. P., Bittencourt, G. K. G. D., de Oliveira, F. B., Simpson, C. A., & Silva, A. O. (2016) · International Archives of Medicine · doi:10.3823/1892 · Cited by 12
Delva, M. L., Sakr, M., Chegani, R. S., Khoshnam, M., & Menon, C. (2018) · IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob) · doi:10.1109/biorob.2018.8488087 · Cited by 12
Personal and Interpersonal Drivers that Contribute to the Intention to Use Gerontechnologies
Regge, M. D., Baelen, F. V., Beirão, G., Ambtman, A. D., Pourcq, K. D., Dias, J. C., & Kandampully, J. A. (2019) · Gerontology · doi:10.1159/000502113 · Cited by 12
Technologies and Images of Older Women
Tomás, M. S. A., & Zorrilla-Muñoz, V. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-50232-4_12 · Cited by 15
Can Smart Home Technology Deliver on the Promise of Independent Living?
Peek, S. T. M., Aarts, S., & Wouters, E. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-01904-8_41-1 · Cited by 14
Self-citationSocio-Technical Challenges in Implementation of Monitoring Technologies in Elderly Care
Kolkowska, E., Nöu, A. A., Sjölinder, M., & Scandurra, I. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-39949-2_5 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Peek, S. T. M., Wouters, E. J. M., van Hoof, J., Luijkx, K. G., Boeije, H. R., & Vrijhoef, H. J. M.
- Affiliations
- Tilburg University (NL)
- Fontys University of Applied Sciences (NL)
- Utrecht University (NL)
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- Corresponding author
- Peek, Sebastiaan T.M.
- ORCID
- Venue
- International Journal of Medical Informatics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-04
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 235-248
- ISSN
- 1386-5056 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2105499459
- Cited by
- 1,206
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 159 · 2025: 117 · 2024: 95 · 2023: 120 · 2022: 105 · 2021: 120 · 2020: 129 · 2019: 91 · 2018: 103 · 2017: 70 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 10
- FWCI
- 19.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Medical Informatics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (acceptedVersion)
- Research portal (Tilburg University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science (OCW) (PRO-3-37)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Technology Use by Older Adults
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
- Keywords
- technology acceptance, aging in place, community-dwelling older adults, electronic health technology, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, privacy concerns, usability, social influence, family caregivers, safety technology, technology adoption
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Attitude to Computers, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Technology Assessment, Biomedical, Independent Living
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
