Cited by 1,206Technology Use by Older AdultsTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourAssistive Technology in Communication and Mobility

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: A systematic review

Open access

Peek, Sebastiaan T.M., Wouters, Eveline J.M., van Hoof, Joost, Luijkx, Katrien G., Boeije, Hennie R., Vrijhoef, Hubertus J.M.·2014·International Journal of Medical Informatics

DOI 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.01.004

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

Abstract

PURPOSE: To provide an overview of factors influencing the acceptance of electronic technologies that support aging in place by community-dwelling older adults. Since technology acceptance factors fluctuate over time, a distinction was made between factors in the pre-implementation stage and factors in the post-implementation stage. METHODS: A systematic review of mixed studies. Seven major scientific databases (including MEDLINE, Scopus and CINAHL) were searched. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) original and peer-reviewed research, (2) qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods research, (3) research in which participants are community-dwelling older adults aged 60 years or older, and (4) research aimed at investigating factors that influence the intention to use or the actual use of electronic technology for aging in place. Three researchers each read the articles and extracted factors. RESULTS: Sixteen out of 2841 articles were included. Most articles investigated acceptance of technology that enhances safety or provides social interaction. The majority of data was based on qualitative research investigating factors in the pre-implementation stage. Acceptance in this stage is influenced by 27 factors, divided into six themes: concerns regarding technology (e.g., high cost, privacy implications and usability factors); expected benefits of technology (e.g., increased safety and perceived usefulness); need for technology (e.g., perceived need and subjective health status); alternatives to technology (e.g., help by family or spouse), social influence (e.g., influence of family, friends and professional caregivers); and characteristics of older adults (e.g., desire to age in place). When comparing these results to qualitative results on post-implementation acceptance, our analysis showed that some factors are persistent while new factors also emerge. Quantitative results showed that a small number of variables have a significant influence in the pre-implementation stage. Fourteen out of the sixteen included articles did not use an existing technology acceptance framework or model. CONCLUSIONS: Acceptance of technology in the pre-implementation stage is influenced by multiple factors. However, post-implementation research on technology acceptance by community-dwelling older adults is scarce and most of the factors in this review have not been tested by using quantitative methods. Further research is needed to determine if and how the factors in this review are interrelated, and how they relate to existing models of technology acceptance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.01.004

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
Diffusion of Innovations 1
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203710753-35 · Cited by 37,670
Diffusion of innovations
Valente, T. W. (2003) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.gim.0000061743.67794.c4 · Cited by 20,559
Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology1
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41410412 · Cited by 15,756
Revisiting the Behavioral Model and Access to Medical Care: Does it Matter?
Andersen, R. M. (1995) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2137284 · Cited by 9,831
Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-8-45 · Cited by 9,312
Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model
Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00143-4 · Cited by 4,250
Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs1
Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W., & Chervany, N. L. (1999) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249751 · Cited by 3,833
A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model
King, W. R., & He, J. (2006) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2006.05.003 · Cited by 2,906

Show all 69 references

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 999

Care Robot Orientation: What, Who and How? Potential Users’ Perceptions
Johansson‐Pajala, R., Thommes, K., Hoppe, J. A., Tuisku, O., Hennala, L., Pekkarinen, S., Melkas, H., & Gustafsson, C. (2020) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-020-00619-y · Cited by 73
Ethical adoption: A new imperative in the development of technology for dementia
Robillard, J., Cleland, I., Hoey, J., & Nugent, C. (2018) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2018.04.012 · Cited by 72
New Integrated Model Approach to Understand the Factors That Drive Electronic Health Record Portal Adoption: Cross-Sectional National Survey
Tavares, J., & Oliveira, T. (2018) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/11032 · Cited by 87
Learning and Use of eHealth Among Older Adults Living at Home in Rural and Nonrural Settings: Systematic Review
Airola, E. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/23804 · Cited by 63
Listening to the ones who care: exploring the perceptions of informal caregivers towards ambient assisted living applications
Jaschinski, C., & Allouch, S. B. (2018) · Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing · doi:10.1007/s12652-018-0856-6 · Cited by 74
Origins and consequences of technology acquirement by independent-living seniors: towards an integrative model
Peek, S., Luijkx, K., Vrijhoef, H., Nieboer, M., Aarts, S., van der Voort, C. S., Rijnaard, M. D., & Wouters, E. (2017) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-017-0582-5 · Cited by 65
Self-citation
Navigating Relationships and Boundaries: Concerns around ICT-uptake for Elderly People
Hornung, D., Müller, C., Shklovski, I., Jakobi, T., & Wulf, V. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3025453.3025859 · Cited by 69
Developing Design Solutions for Smart Homes Through User-Centered Scenarios
Kim, M. J., Cho, M. E., & Jun, H. J. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00335 · Cited by 70
Factors Influencing Health Care Technology Acceptance in Older Adults Based on the Technology Acceptance Model and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: Meta-Analysis
Yang, H. J., Lee, J., & Lee, W. (2025) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/65269 · Cited by 97
A new conceptual model of experiences of aging in place in the United States: Results of a systematic review and meta-ethnography of qualitative studies
Rosenwohl‐Mack, A., Schumacher, K. L., Fang, M.-L. E., & Fukuoka, Y. (2019) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103496 · Cited by 67
Acceptance of IoT-based and sustainability-oriented smart city services: A mixed methods study
Beştepe, F., & Özkan, S. (2022) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2022.103794 · Cited by 68
Why do Family Members Reject AI in Health Care? Competing Effects of Emotions
Park, E. H., Werder, K., Cao, L., & Ramesh, B. (2022) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2022.2096550 · Cited by 75
They also do it: Internet use by older adults living in residential care facilities
Seifert, A., Doh, M., & Wahl, H. (2017) · Educational Gerontology · doi:10.1080/03601277.2017.1326224 · Cited by 66
Why do older people love and hate assistive technology? ‒ an emotional experience perspective
Chen, K. (2020) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2020.1808714 · Cited by 71
Needs, barriers and facilitators of older adults towards eHealth in general practice: a qualitative study
Vergouw, J. W., Smits-Pelser, H., Kars, M. C., van Houwelingen, T., van Os‐Medendorp, H., Kort, H. S. M., & Bleijenberg, N. (2020) · Primary Health Care Research & Development · doi:10.1017/s1463423620000547 · Cited by 66
Safely and Actively Aging in Place: Older Adults’ Attitudes and Intentions Toward Smart Home Technologies
Tural, E., Lu, D., & Cole, D. A. (2021) · Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine · doi:10.1177/23337214211017340 · Cited by 65
Gerontechnology for better elderly care and life quality: a systematic literature review
Huang, G., & Oteng, S. A. (2023) · European Journal of Ageing · doi:10.1007/s10433-023-00776-9 · Cited by 78
Emerging Technologies With Potential Care and Support Applications for Older People: Review of Gray Literature
Abdi, S., de Witte, L., & Hawley, M. (2020) · JMIR Aging · doi:10.2196/17286 · Cited by 68
Older adults’ willingness to share their personal and health information when adopting healthcare technology and services
Kim, T. K., & Choi, M. (2019) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.03.010 · Cited by 65
Impact of Social Media on Health-Related Outcomes Among Older Adults in Singapore: Qualitative Study
Han, M., Tan, X. Y., Lee, R. Z. Y., Lee, J. K., & Mahendran, R. (2021) · JMIR Aging · doi:10.2196/23826 · Cited by 71
Older People and Technology Acceptance
Klimova, B., & Poulová, P. (2018) · Interacción · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-92034-4_7 · Cited by 50
Study of B and T cell phenotypes in blood from patients with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID).
Farrant, J., Spickett, G., Matamoros, N., Copas, D. K., Hernández-González, M., North, M. E., Chapel, H. M., & WEBSTER, A. D. B. (1994) · PubMed · Cited by 63
A Smart Sensing Architecture for Domestic Monitoring: Methodological Approach and Experimental Validation
Monteriù, A., Prist, M., Frontoni, E., Longhi, S., Pietroni, F., Casaccia, S., Scalise, L., Cenci, A., Romeo, L., Berta, R., et al. (2018) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s18072310 · Cited by 62
Acceptance of Technologies for Aging in Place: A Conceptual Model
Jaschinski, C., Allouch, S. B., Peters, O., Cachucho, R., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/22613 · Cited by 70
A longitudinal examination of tablet self-management technology acceptance by patients with chronic diseases: Integrating perceived hand function, perceived visual function, and perceived home space adequacy with the TAM and TPB
Liu, K., Or, C. K., So, M. K. P., Cheung, B. M. Y., Chan, B. K. P., Tiwari, A., & Tan, J. (2021) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103667 · Cited by 62
Public transport inclusion and active aging: A systematic review on elderly mobility
Zhang, N., & Yang, Q. (2024) · Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition) · doi:10.1016/j.jtte.2024.04.001 · Cited by 73
“Call a Teenager… That’s What I Do!” - Grandchildren Help Older Adults Use New Technologies: Qualitative Study
Portz, J. D., Fruhauf, C. A., Bull, S. S., Boxer, R. S., Bekelman, D. B., Casillas, A., Gleason, K. S., & Bayliss, E. A. (2019) · JMIR Aging · doi:10.2196/13713 · Cited by 59
A study on community older people’s willingness to use smart home—an extended technology acceptance model with intergenerational relationships
Wei, W., Gong, X., Li, J., Tian, K., & Xing, K. (2023) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1139667 · Cited by 65
Senior Care for Aging in Place
Caldeira, C. M., Bietz, M. J., Vidauri, M., & Chen, Y. (2017) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/2998181.2998206 · Cited by 69
A 12-week pilot study of acceptance of a computer-based chronic disease self-monitoring system among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and/or hypertension
Yan, M., & Or, C. K. (2017) · Health Informatics Journal · doi:10.1177/1460458217724580 · Cited by 60
Factors influencing technology use among low-income older adults: A systematic review
Chan, D. Y. L., Lee, S. W. H., & Teh, P.-L. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20111 · Cited by 60
Assessment of Perceived Attractiveness, Usability, and Societal Impact of a Multimodal Robotic Assistant for Aging Patients With Memory Impairments
Gerłowska, J., Skrobas, U., Grabowska-Aleksandrowicz, K., Korchut, A., Szklener, S., Szczęśniak-Stańczyk, D., Tzovaras, D. K., & Rejdak, K. (2018) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2018.00392 · Cited by 63
How older adults with mild cognitive impairment relate to technology as part of present and future everyday life: a qualitative study
Hedman, A., Lindqvist, E., & Nygård, L. (2016) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-016-0245-y · Cited by 59
United States older adults’ willingness to use emerging technologies
Kadylak, T., & Cotten, S. R. (2020) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2020.1713848 · Cited by 59
Reducing loneliness and improving well-being among older adults with animatronic pets
Tkatch, R., Wu, L., MacLeod, S., Ungar, R., Albright, L., Russell, D., Murphy, J., Schaeffer, J., & Yeh, C. S. (2020) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607863.2020.1758906 · Cited by 65
What does the literature say about the use of personal voice assistants in older adults? A scoping review
Arnold, A., Kolody, S., Comeau, A., & Miguel Cruz, A. (2024) · Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology · doi:10.1080/17483107.2022.2065369 · Cited by 59
Pilot testing a digital pet avatar for older adults
Chi, N.-C., Sparks, O., Lin, S.-Y., Lazar, A., Thompson, H. J., & Demiris, G. (2017) · Geriatric Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.gerinurse.2017.04.002 · Cited by 56
Smart and Age-Friendly Cities in Romania: An Overview of Public Policy and Practice
Ivan, L., Beu, D., & van Hoof, J. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17145202 · Cited by 68
User Requirements for Technology to Assist Aging in Place: Qualitative Study of Older People and Their Informal Support Networks
Elers, P., Hunter, I. M., Whiddett, D., Lockhart, C. A., Guesgen, H. W., & Singh, A. S. G. (2018) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/10741 · Cited by 57
Perceptions About Technologies That Help Community-Dwelling Older Adults Remain at Home: Qualitative Study
Verloo, H., Kampel, T., Vidal, N., & Pereira, F. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/17930 · Cited by 57
Attitudes of Health Care Professionals Toward Older Adults’ Abilities to Use Digital Technology: Questionnaire Study
Mannheim, I., Wouters, E., van Boekel, L. C., & van Zaalen, Y. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/26232 · Cited by 61
Self-citation
Wearable Devices for Assessing Function in Alzheimer's Disease: A European Public Involvement Activity About the Features and Preferences of Patients and Caregivers
Stavropoulos, T. G., Lazarou, I., Diaz, A., Gove, D., Georges, J., Manyakov, N. V., Pich, E. M., Hinds, C., Tsolaki, M., Nikolopoulos, S., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2021.643135 · Cited by 58
Improving Acceptability of mHealth Apps—The Use of the Technology Acceptance Model to Assess the Acceptability of mHealth Apps: Systematic Review
Adnan, A., Irvine, R. E., Williams, A., Harris, M. J., & Antonacci, G. (2025) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/66432 · Cited by 75
Caring by telecare? A hermeneutic study of experiences among older adults and their family caregivers
Karlsen, C., Moe, C. E., Haraldstad, K., & Thygesen, E. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/jocn.14744 · Cited by 72
Effective use of information technologies by seniors: the case of wearable device use
Abouzahra, M., & Ghasemaghaei, M. (2021) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1080/0960085x.2021.1876534 · Cited by 62
Towards Privacy-Preserved Aging in Place: A Systematic Review
Gochoo, M., Alnajjar, F., Tan, T.-H., & Khalid, S. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21093082 · Cited by 62
Acceptance of a Virtual Reality Headset Designed for Fall Prevention in Older Adults: Questionnaire Study
Mascret, N., Delbes, L., Voron, A., Temprado, J.-J., & Montagne, G. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/20691 · Cited by 58
Effectiveness of a Mobile Health and Self-Management App for High-Risk Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Daily Clinical Practice: Mixed Methods Evaluation Study
Kooij, L., Vos, P. J. E., Dijkstra, A., & van Harten, W. H. (2021) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/21977 · Cited by 60
Assistive Technology and Mobile ICT Usage Among Oldest-Old Cohorts: Comparison of the Oldest-Old in Private Homes and in Long-Term Care Facilities
Schlomann, A., Seifert, A., Zank, S., & Rietz, C. (2020) · Research on Aging · doi:10.1177/0164027520911286 · Cited by 54
The Acceptance Behavior of Smart Home Health Care Services in South Korea: An Integrated Model of UTAUT and TTF
Kang, H., Han, J., & Kwon, G. H. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph192013279 · Cited by 61
Is Aging in Place Delaying Nursing Home Admission?
Young, Y., Kalamaras, J., Kelly, L., Hornick, D., & Yucel, R. M. (2015) · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2015.07.017 · Cited by 55
COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF TELEHEALTH INTERVENTIONS FOR CHRONIC HEART FAILURE PATIENTS: A LITERATURE REVIEW
Grustam, A. S., Severens, J. L., van Nijnatten, J., Koymans, R., & Vrijhoef, H. J. (2014) · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · doi:10.1017/s0266462313000779 · Cited by 65
Self-citation
Quality of Life Framework for Personalised Ageing: A Systematic Review of ICT Solutions
Baraković, S., Husić, J. B., van Hoof, J., Krejcar, O., Marešová, P., Akhtar, Z., & Muñoz, F. J. M. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17082940 · Cited by 55
Continued use of an interactive computer game-based visual perception learning system in children with developmental delay
Lin, H.-C., Chiu, Y.-H., Chen, Y. J., Wuang, Y.-P., Chen, C.-P., Wang, C.-C., Huang, C., Wu, T.-M., & Ho, W. (2017) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.09.003 · Cited by 53
Mobile applications for elderly healthcare: A systematic mapping
Paiva, J. O. V., Andrade, R. M. C., Oliveira, P., Duarte, P., Santos, I. S., Evangelista, A. L. D. P., Theophilo, R. L., de Andrade, L. O. M., & Barrêto, I. C. D. H. C. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0236091 · Cited by 54
Using the Technology Acceptance Model to explore community dwelling older adults’ perceptions of a 3D interior design application to facilitate pre-discharge home adaptations
Money, A., Atwal, A., Young, K. L., Day, Y., Wilson, L., & Money, K. G. (2015) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-015-0190-2 · Cited by 53
Addressing healthy aging populations in developing countries: unlocking the opportunity of eHealth and mHealth
Henriquez-Camacho, C. A., Losa, J. E., Miranda, J. J., & Cheyne, N. (2014) · Emerging Themes in Epidemiology · doi:10.1186/s12982-014-0021-4 · Cited by 52
Understanding Older Users' Acceptance of Wearable Interfaces for Sensor-based Fall Risk Assessment
Wu, A. Y., & Munteanu, C. (2018) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3173693 · Cited by 53
Persuasive technology to support active and healthy ageing: An exploration of past, present, and future
Cabrita, M., den Akker, H. O., Tabak, M., Hermens, H. J., & Vollenbroek-Hutten, M. M. R. (2018) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2018.06.010 · Cited by 56
Determinants of technology adoption and continued use among cognitively impaired older adults: a qualitative study
Dequanter, S., Fobelets, M., Steenhout, I., Gagnon, M., Bourbonnais, A., Rahimi, S. A., Buyl, R., & Gorus, E. (2022) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-022-03048-w · Cited by 63
Impact of the Built Environment on Ageing in Place: A Systematic Overview of Reviews
Jiaxuan, E., Xia, B., Chen, Q., Buys, L. R., Susilawati, C., & Drogemuller, R. (2024) · Buildings · doi:10.3390/buildings14082355 · Cited by 51
Older people and the use of ICTs to communicate with children and grandchildren
Ivan, L., & Fernández-Ardèvol, M. (2017) · Transnational Social Review · doi:10.1080/21931674.2016.1277861 · Cited by 51
Everyday life after a hip fracture: what community-living older adults perceive as most beneficial for their recovery
Pol, M., Peek, S. T. M., van Nes, F., van Hartingsveldt, M. J., Buurman, B. M., & Kröse, B. (2019) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/afz012 · Cited by 56
Self-citation
Friends or Frenemies? The Role of Social Technology in the Lives of Older People
ten Bruggencate, T., Luijkx, K. G., & Sturm, J. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16244969 · Cited by 52
Self-citation
“I hope I never need one”: Unpacking Stigma in Aging in Place Technology
Caldeira, C. M., Nurain, N., & Connelly, K. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3517586 · Cited by 55
Older women’s perceptions of wearable and smart home activity sensors
Reeder, B., Chung, J., Lyden, K. A., Winters, J. D., & Jankowski, C. M. (2019) · Informatics for Health and Social Care · doi:10.1080/17538157.2019.1582054 · Cited by 49
Acceptance, adoption, and usability of information and communication technologies for people living with dementia and their care partners: a systematic review
Cruz, A. M., Daum, C., Comeau, A. K., Salamanca, J. D. G., McLennan, L., Neubauer, N., & Liu, L. (2020) · Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology · doi:10.1080/17483107.2020.1864671 · Cited by 50
Mobile and Connected Health Technology Needs for Older Adults Aging in Place: Cross-Sectional Survey Study
Wang, J., Du, Y. N., Coleman, D. C., Peck, M., Myneni, S., Kang, H., & Gong, Y. (2019) · JMIR Aging · doi:10.2196/13864 · Cited by 49
Smartphone application training program improves smartphone usage competency and quality of life among the elderly in an elder university in China: A randomized controlled trial
Zhao, X., Wang, L., Ge, C., Zhen, X., Chen, Z., Wang, J., & Zhou, Y. (2019) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.104010 · Cited by 57
Users’ response toward online doctor consultation platforms: SOR approach
Goyal, S., Chauhan, S., & Gupta, P. (2021) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-02-2021-0268 · Cited by 51
What Drives the Adoption of Agricultural Green Production Technologies? An Extension of TAM in Agriculture
Dai, Q., & Cheng, K. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su142114457 · Cited by 54
Smart Homes and Quality of Life for the Elderly: Perspective of Competing Models
Pal, D., Triyason, T., Funilkul, S., & Chutimaskul, W. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2798614 · Cited by 53
Evaluation of 1-Year in-Home Monitoring Technology by Home-Dwelling Older Adults, Family Caregivers, and Nurses
Pais, B., Buluschek, P., DuPasquier, G., Nef, T., Schütz, N., Saner, H. E., Gática-Pérez, D., & Santschi, V. (2020) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2020.518957 · Cited by 48
Exploring the impact of digital distrust on user resistance to e-health services among older adults: the moderating effect of anticipated regret
Ezeudoka, B. C., & Fan, M. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03457-9 · Cited by 54
Rehabilitation and Psychosocial Determinants of Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Older Adults
Tang, L., Thompson, C. B., Clark, J. H., Ceh, K. M., Yeagle, J. D., & Francis, H. W. (2017) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0000000000000445 · Cited by 47
When your world gets smaller: how older people try to meet their social needs, including the role of social technology
ten Bruggencate, T., Luijkx, K. G., & Sturm, J. (2018) · Ageing and Society · doi:10.1017/s0144686x18000260 · Cited by 54
Self-citation
Narrative Review: Technologies in Eldercare
Frennert, S., & Östlund, B. (2018) · Nordic Journal of Science and Technology Studies · doi:10.5324/njsts.v6i1.2518 · Cited by 59
System models for resilience in gerontology: application to the COVID-19 pandemic
Klasa, K., Galaitsi, S., Wister, A., & Linkov, I. (2021) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-020-01965-2 · Cited by 52
Social transformation and social isolation of older adults: Digital technologies, nursing, healthcare
Locsin, R. C., Soriano, G. P., Juntasopeepun, P., Kunaviktikul, W., & Evangelista, L. S. (2021) · Collegian Journal of the Royal College of Nursing Australia · doi:10.1016/j.colegn.2021.01.005 · Cited by 56
Privacy vs. Security: Trade-Offs in the Acceptance of Smart Technologies for Aging-in-Place
Schomakers, E.-M., & Ziefle, M. (2022) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2078463 · Cited by 47
SmartSenior@home: Acceptance of an integrated ambient assisted living system. Results of a clinical field trial in 35 households
Gövercin, M., Meyer, S., Schellenbach, M., Steinhagen‐Thiessen, E., Weiss, B., & Haesner, M. (2016) · Informatics for Health and Social Care · doi:10.3109/17538157.2015.1064425 · Cited by 46
Bare necessities? How the need for care modulates the acceptance of ambient assisted living technologies
Offermann, J., Schomakers, E.-M., & Ziefle, M. (2019) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.04.025 · Cited by 49
Meet Stevie: a Socially Assistive Robot Developed Through Application of a ‘Design-Thinking’ Approach
McGinn, C., Bourke, E., Murtagh, A., Donovan, C., Lynch, P., Cullinan, M. F., & Kelly, K. (2020) · Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems · doi:10.1007/s10846-019-01051-9 · Cited by 46
The antecedents and results of seniors’ use of activity tracking wearable devices
Abouzahra, M., & Ghasemaghaei, M. (2019) · Health Policy and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.hlpt.2019.11.002 · Cited by 50
Patients’ Perspectives Regarding Digital Health Technology to Support Self-management and Improve Integrated Stroke Care: Qualitative Interview Study
Bally, E., Cheng, D., van Grieken, A., Sanz, M. F., Zanutto, O., Carroll, Á. M., Darley, A., Roozenbeek, B., Dippel, D. W. J., & Raat, H. (2023) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/42556 · Cited by 45
Nothing Else Matters! Trade-Offs Between Perceived Benefits and Barriers of AAL Technology Usage
Offermann, J., & Ziefle, M. (2019) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2019.00134 · Cited by 54
Nurses’ experiences and viewpoints about the benefits of adopting information technology in health care: a qualitative study in Iran
Farokhzadian, J., Khajouei, R., Hasman, A., & Ahmadian, L. (2020) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-020-01260-5 · Cited by 53
VR usability from elderly cohorts: Preparatory challenges in overcoming technology rejection
Coldham, G., & Cook, D. M. (2017) · 2017 National Information Technology Conference (NITC) · doi:10.1109/nitc.2017.8285645 · Cited by 47
Factors Associated with the Acceptance of New Technologies for Ageing in Place by People over 64 Years of Age
Chimento‐Díaz, S., Sánchez‐García, P., Franco‐Antonio, C., Santano‐Mogena, E., Espino-Tato, I., & Cordovilla‐Guardia, S. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19052947 · Cited by 47
Determinants of information communication and smart home automation technology adoption for aging-in-place
Arthanat, S., Chang, H., & Wilcox, J. (2020) · Journal of Enabling Technologies · doi:10.1108/jet-11-2019-0050 · Cited by 44
Digital ageing in Europe: a comparative analysis of Italian, Finnish and Swedish national policies on eHealth
Valokivi, H., Carlo, S., Kvist, E., & Outila, M. (2021) · Ageing and Society · doi:10.1017/s0144686x21000945 · Cited by 51
Exploring the Presence of Humanoid Social Robots at Home and Capturing Human-Robot Interactions with Older Adults: Experiences from Four Case Studies
Leung, A. Y. M., Zhao, I. Y., Lin, S., & Lau, T. W. (2022) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare11010039 · Cited by 50
Learning and knowing technology as lived experience in people with Alzheimer's disease: a phenomenological study
Rosenberg, L., & Nygård, L. (2016) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607863.2016.1222347 · Cited by 44
User experience and clinical effectiveness with two wearable global positioning system devices in home dementia care
Megges, H., Freiesleben, S. D., Rösch, C., Knoll, N., Wessel, L., & Peters, O. (2018) · Alzheimer s & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.trci.2018.10.002 · Cited by 46
Factors related to the use of magnifying low vision aids: a scoping review
Lorenzini, M.-C., & Wittich, W. (2019) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638288.2019.1593519 · Cited by 43
Designing Conversational AI for Aging: A Systematic Review of Older Adults' Perceptions and Needs
Yuan-hui, H., Zhou, Q., & Piper, A. M. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713578 · Cited by 62
Discrepancies in Demand of Internet of Things Services Among Older People and People With Disabilities, Their Caregivers, and Health Care Providers: Face-to-Face Survey Study
Lee, H., Park, Y. R., Kim, H. R., Kang, N. Y., Oh, G., Jang, I., & Lee, E. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/16614 · Cited by 42
Can connected technologies improve sleep quality and safety of older adults and care-givers? An evaluation study of sleep monitors and communicative robots at a residential care home in Japan
Obayashi, K., Kodate, N., & Masuyama, S. (2020) · Technology and Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101318 · Cited by 38
Warm Technology: A Novel Perspective on Design for and with People Living with Dementia
IJsselsteijn, W. A., Tummers-Heemels, A., & Brankaert, R. (2020) · Human-computer interaction series · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-32835-1_3 · Cited by 42
How older adults use Ride-hailing booking technology in California
Misra, A., Shirgaokar, M., Agrawal, A. W., Dobbs, B., & Wachs, M. (2021) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2021.10.022 · Cited by 42

Authors: Peek, S. T. M., Wouters, E. J. M., van Hoof, J., Luijkx, K. G., Boeije, H. R., & Vrijhoef, H. J. M.
Affiliations: Tilburg University (NL)
Fontys University of Applied Sciences (NL)
Utrecht University (NL)
National University of Singapore (SG)
Corresponding author: Peek, Sebastiaan T.M.
ORCID: Peek, Sebastiaan T.M.
Wouters, Eveline J.M.
Luijkx, Katrien G.
Boeije, Hennie R.
Vrijhoef, Hubertus J.M.
Venue: International Journal of Medical Informatics
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 2014-04
Volume: 83
Issue: 4
Pages: 235-248
ISSN: 1386-5056 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.01.004
OpenAlex: W2105499459
Cited by: 1,206
References: 69
Citations by year: 2026: 159 · 2025: 117 · 2024: 95 · 2023: 120 · 2022: 105 · 2021: 120 · 2020: 129 · 2019: 91 · 2018: 103 · 2017: 70 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 10
FWCI: 19.10
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: hybrid
doi.org
Licence: cc-by-nc-nd
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ (vor)
Locations: International Journal of Medical Informatics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (acceptedVersion)
Research portal (Tilburg University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
Funders: Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science (OCW) (PRO-3-37)
Topics: Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Technology Use by Older Adults
Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Keywords: technology acceptance, aging in place, community-dwelling older adults, electronic health technology, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, privacy concerns, usability, social influence, family caregivers, safety technology, technology adoption
MeSH terms: Adult, Aged, Attitude to Computers, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Technology Assessment, Biomedical, Independent Living

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: A systematic review

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks