The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: A systematic review
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: To provide an overview of factors influencing the acceptance of electronic technologies that support aging in place by community-dwelling older adults. Since technology acceptance factors fluctuate over time, a distinction was made between factors in the pre-implementation stage and factors in the post-implementation stage. METHODS: A systematic review of mixed studies. Seven major scientific databases (including MEDLINE, Scopus and CINAHL) were searched. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) original and peer-reviewed research, (2) qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods research, (3) research in which participants are community-dwelling older adults aged 60 years or older, and (4) research aimed at investigating factors that influence the intention to use or the actual use of electronic technology for aging in place. Three researchers each read the articles and extracted factors. RESULTS: Sixteen out of 2841 articles were included. Most articles investigated acceptance of technology that enhances safety or provides social interaction. The majority of data was based on qualitative research investigating factors in the pre-implementation stage. Acceptance in this stage is influenced by 27 factors, divided into six themes: concerns regarding technology (e.g., high cost, privacy implications and usability factors); expected benefits of technology (e.g., increased safety and perceived usefulness); need for technology (e.g., perceived need and subjective health status); alternatives to technology (e.g., help by family or spouse), social influence (e.g., influence of family, friends and professional caregivers); and characteristics of older adults (e.g., desire to age in place). When comparing these results to qualitative results on post-implementation acceptance, our analysis showed that some factors are persistent while new factors also emerge. Quantitative results showed that a small number of variables have a significant influence in the pre-implementation stage. Fourteen out of the sixteen included articles did not use an existing technology acceptance framework or model. CONCLUSIONS: Acceptance of technology in the pre-implementation stage is influenced by multiple factors. However, post-implementation research on technology acceptance by community-dwelling older adults is scarce and most of the factors in this review have not been tested by using quantitative methods. Further research is needed to determine if and how the factors in this review are interrelated, and how they relate to existing models of technology acceptance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Some older adults will perceive a technology as being more relevant for other elderly people with more extensive functional impairments56 and be less motivated to use it themselves.”
From Usability and acceptability of technology for community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic literature review (2018) · cites this paper as [56]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Engaging older adults in a preimplementation study thus risks obtaining a “prototypical result,” according to Peek et al (2014).56”
From Usability and acceptability of technology for community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic literature review (2018) · cites this paper as [56]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This is in line with Peek et al (2014, p. 242), who found that a perceived personal need for technology was the most frequent factor mentioned for technology use and acceptance.56”
From Usability and acceptability of technology for community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic literature review (2018) · cites this paper as [56]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203710753-35 · Cited by 37,670
Valente, T. W. (2003) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.gim.0000061743.67794.c4 · Cited by 20,559
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41410412 · Cited by 15,756
Revisiting the Behavioral Model and Access to Medical Care: Does it Matter?
Andersen, R. M. (1995) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2137284 · Cited by 9,831
Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-8-45 · Cited by 9,312
Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model
Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00143-4 · Cited by 4,250
Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W., & Chervany, N. L. (1999) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249751 · Cited by 3,833
A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model
King, W. R., & He, J. (2006) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2006.05.003 · Cited by 2,906
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 999
Hassan, M. S., Islam, M. A., Yusof, M. F., Nasir, H., & Huda, N. (2023) · Risks · doi:10.3390/risks11020040 · Cited by 55
Kim, S.-D. (2024) · Technologies · doi:10.3390/technologies12050068 · Cited by 40
An, S., Cheung, C. F., & Willoughby, K. W. (2024) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123456 · Cited by 58
Portacolone, E., Halpern, J., Luxenberg, J. S., Harrison, K. L., & Covinsky, K. E. (2020) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-190952 · Cited by 42
Wearable Technologies: Acceptance Model for Smartwatch Adoption Among Older Adults
Lazaro, M. J., Lim, J., Kim, S. H., & Yun, M. H. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-50252-2_23 · Cited by 41
Why is COVID-19 more deadly to nursing home residents?
Su, Z., McDonnell, D., & Li, Y. (2020) · QJM · doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcaa343 · Cited by 40
Examining Identity as a Variable of Health Technology Research for Older Adults: A Systematic Review
Harrington, C., Martin-Hammond, A. M., & Bray, K. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3517621 · Cited by 47
Automation, wellbeing and Digital Voice Assistants: Older people and Google devices
Duque, M., Pink, S., Strengers, Y., Martin, R., & Nicholls, L. (2021) · Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies · doi:10.1177/13548565211038537 · Cited by 39
Schütz, N., Knobel, S. E. J., Botros, A., Single, M., Pais, B., Santschi, V., Gática-Pérez, D., Buluschek, P., Urwyler, P., Gerber, S. M., et al. (2022) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-022-00657-y · Cited by 38
Modelling assistive technology adoption for people with dementia
Chaurasia, P., McClean, S. I., Nugent, C., Cleland, I., Zhang, S., Donnelly, M. P., Scotney, B. W., Sanders, C., Smith, K. R., Norton, M. C., et al. (2016) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2016.08.021 · Cited by 37
McGrath, C., & Astell, A. J. (2016) · British Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.1177/0308022616667959 · Cited by 39
Baric, V. B., Andreassen, M., Öhman, A., & Hemmingsson, H. (2019) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-019-1128-9 · Cited by 38
Factors Affecting the Initial Engagement of Older Adults in the Use of Interactive Technology
Lee, L., & Maher, M. L. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18062847 · Cited by 45
Chung, J., Bleich, M., Wheeler, D. C., Winship, J. M., McDowell, B., Baker, D., & Parsons, P. (2021) · Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine · doi:10.1177/23337214211005869 · Cited by 35
Evidence and User Considerations of Home Health Monitoring for Older Adults: Scoping Review
Chan, A., Cohen, R., Robinson, K.-M., Bhardwaj, D., Gregson, G., Jutai, J. W., Millar, J., Rincon, A. M. R., & Fekr, A. R. (2022) · JMIR Aging · doi:10.2196/40079 · Cited by 41
Evolution of technology perceptions over time
Immonen, M., & Sintonen, S. (2015) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp-12-2013-0219 · Cited by 39
Dupuy, L., Froger, C., Consel, C., & Sauzeon, H. (2017) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2017.00302 · Cited by 38
Airola, E., Rasi, P., & Outila, M. (2020) · Educational Gerontology · doi:10.1080/03601277.2020.1743008 · Cited by 38
In care and digitally savvy? Modern ICT use in long-term care institutions
Seifert, A., & Cotten, S. R. (2020) · Educational Gerontology · doi:10.1080/03601277.2020.1776911 · Cited by 38
Mental health of older migrants migrating along with adult children in China: a systematic review
Wang, J. J., & Lai, D. W. L. (2020) · Ageing and Society · doi:10.1017/s0144686x20001166 · Cited by 38
Shang, X., Liu, Z., Gong, C., Hu, Z., Wu, Y., & Wang, C. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03658-2 · Cited by 37
Innovating for elderly people: the development of geront’innovations in the French silver economy
Laperche, B., Boutillier, S., Djellal, F., Ingham, M., Liu, Z., Picard, F., Reboud, S., Tanguy, C., & Uzunidis, D. (2018) · Technology Analysis and Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537325.2018.1520975 · Cited by 37
Jaana, M., Sherrard, H., & Paré, G. (2018) · Health Informatics Journal · doi:10.1177/1460458218799458 · Cited by 37
A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR SUSTAINABLE eHEALTH IMPLEMENTATION IN RESOURCE-CONSTRAINED SETTINGS
Fanta, G. B., & Pretorius, L. (2018) · The South African Journal of Industrial Engineering · doi:10.7166/29-3-2055 · Cited by 43
Golant, S. M. (2019) · Journal of Aging Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jaging.2019.100793 · Cited by 43
The Role of Ageism in the Acceptance and Use of Digital Technology
Mannheim, I., Varlamova, M., van Zaalen, Y., & Wouters, E. (2023) · Journal of Applied Gerontology · doi:10.1177/07334648231163426 · Cited by 44
Self-citationSurvey on the acceptance of smart cars amongst middle-aged and elderly in China
Zeng, F., Wang, M., Li, L., & Cai, S. (2023) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102234 · Cited by 39
Huang, L. L., Chen, R. P., & Chan, K. W. (2024) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-024-01017-w · Cited by 40
A Systematic Review of Home Modifications for Aging in Place in Older Adults
Cha, S.-M. (2025) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare13070752 · Cited by 36
Sereika, S. M., Dabbs, A. D., Handler, S. M., Schlenk, E. A., & Jiang, Y. (2016) · Applied Clinical Informatics · doi:10.4338/aci-2015-12-ra-0170 · Cited by 36
van Velsen, L., Evers, M., Bara, C.-D., den Akker, H. O., Boerema, S., & Hermens, H. J. (2018) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/10474 · Cited by 37
Pflegeroboter: Analyse und Bewertung aus Sicht pflegerischen Handelns und ethischer Anforderungen
Remmers, H. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-22698-5_9 · Cited by 36
The Influence of Feedback Type in Robot-Assisted Training
Akalın, N., Kristoffersson, A., & Loutfi, A. (2019) · Multimodal Technologies and Interaction · doi:10.3390/mti3040067 · Cited by 37
Díaz-Orueta, U., Hopper, L., & Konstantinidis, E. I. (2020) · Health Informatics Journal · doi:10.1177/1460458219899590 · Cited by 36
Chen, K., LOU, V. W. Q., & Lo, S. S. C. (2021) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103381 · Cited by 37
Baer, N.-R., Vietzke, J., & Schenk, L. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0278879 · Cited by 41
Mujirishvili, T., Maidhof, C., Flórez‐Revuelta, F., Ziefle, M., Richart‐Martínez, M., & Cabrero‐García, J. (2023) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/45297 · Cited by 44
Attitudes related to technology for active and healthy aging in a national multigenerational survey
Offerman, J., Fristedt, S., Schmidt, S., Löfqvist, C., & Iwarsson, S. (2023) · Nature Aging · doi:10.1038/s43587-023-00392-3 · Cited by 35
Yehualashet, G., Asemahagn, M. A., & Tilahun, B. C. (2015) · doi:10.12856/jhia-2015-v3-i1-124 · Cited by 35
Alsulami, M. H., & Atkins, A. S. (2016) · Ageing International · doi:10.1007/s12126-016-9246-6 · Cited by 35
Modelling factors influencing the adoption of smart-home technologies
Wong, J. K. W., & Leung, J. K. L. (2016) · Facilities · doi:10.1108/f-05-2016-0048 · Cited by 36
A Survey on Smart Homes for Aging in Place: Toward Solutions to the Specific Needs of the Elderly
Nathan, V., Paul, S., Prioleau, T., Niu, L., Mortazavi, B. J., Cambone, S. A., Veeraraghavan, A., Sabharwal, A., & Jafari, R. (2018) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2018.2846286 · Cited by 35
Marston, H. R., Niles-Yokum, K., & Silva, P. A. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18020837 · Cited by 35
Dembovski, A., Amitai, Y., & Levy‐Tzedek, S. (2022) · Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences · doi:10.3389/fresc.2021.793233 · Cited by 36
Walle, A. D., Demsash, A. W., Adem, J. B., Wubante, S. M., Shibabaw, A. A., Mamo, D. N., Kebede, S. D., Muluneh, A. A., Mengistie, M. B., Gebeyew, A. S., et al. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0287991 · Cited by 34
Dermody, G., Fritz, R., Glass, C., Dunham, M., & Whitehead, L. (2023) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.15826 · Cited by 34
Technology to support aging in place: key messages for policymakers and funders
Genge, C., McNeil, H., Debergue, P., & Freeman, S. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1287486 · Cited by 38
Naszay, M., Stockinger, A., Jungwirth, D., & Haluza, D. (2017) · Informatics for Health and Social Care · doi:10.1080/17538157.2017.1399131 · Cited by 34
Donner, C. F., Raskin, J. M., ZuWallack, R., Nici, L. L., Ambrosino, N., Balbi, B., Blackstock, F. C., Casaburi, R. H., Dreher, M., Effing, T., et al. (2018) · Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2018.09.003 · Cited by 39
Rhee, J. H., Hoon, J., Seo, J., & Cha, S. H. (2022) · Journal of Computational Design and Engineering · doi:10.1093/jcde/qwac030 · Cited by 33
Zhong, R., & Rau, P. P. (2019) · Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics · doi:10.1016/j.archger.2019.103970 · Cited by 33
Brauner, P., & Ziefle, M. (2020) · JMIR Serious Games · doi:10.2196/14182 · Cited by 36
Implementation of Unobtrusive Sensing Systems for Older Adult Care: Scoping Review
Sharma, N., Brinke, J. K., van Gemert‐Pijnen, J. E. W. C., & Braakman‐Jansen, A. (2021) · JMIR Aging · doi:10.2196/27862 · Cited by 39
Costa‐Brito, A. R., Bovolini, A., Rúa-Alonso, M., Vaz, C., Morán, J. F. O., Pagador, J. B., & Vila-Chã, C. J. F. (2023) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105287 · Cited by 31
Chan, C. K. Y., Burton, K., & Flower, R. L. (2024) · Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1080/21642850.2024.2398167 · Cited by 32
Prevailing Opinions on Connected Health in Austria: Results from an Online Survey
Haluza, D., Naszay, M., Stockinger, A., & Jungwirth, D. (2016) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph13080813 · Cited by 33
Larsen, S. M., Mortensen, R. F., Kristensen, H. K., & Hounsgaard, L. (2018) · Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology · doi:10.1080/17483107.2018.1463403 · Cited by 32
Grošelj, D., Reisdorf, B. C., & Petrovčič, A. (2018) · Telecommunications Policy · doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2018.07.004 · Cited by 32
Haufe, M., Peek, S. T. M., & Luijkx, K. G. (2019) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-018-3848-5 · Cited by 33
Self-citationFänge, A. M., Carlsson, G., Chiatti, C., & Lethin, C. (2019) · Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences · doi:10.1111/scs.12766 · Cited by 39
Mbakaya, B. C., Kalembo, F. W., & Zgambo, M. (2020) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-020-09101-w · Cited by 36
Khan, T., Khan, K. D., Azhar, M. S., Shah, S. N. A., Uddin, M. M., & Khan, T. H. (2021) · Journal of Public Affairs · doi:10.1002/pa.2685 · Cited by 32
Hsu, C., & Peng, C.-C. (2021) · Informatics for Health and Social Care · doi:10.1080/17538157.2021.1990299 · Cited by 35
Supportive home health care technology for older adults: Attitudes and implementation
Charness, N., Best, R., & Evans, J. (2016) · Gerontechnology · doi:10.4017/gt.2016.15.4.006.00 · Cited by 27
Jiang, L., Wang, Z.-Z., Peng, T., & Zhu, J. J. H. (2014) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.09.003 · Cited by 32
14 Years longitudinal evaluation of clinical information systems acceptance: The HEGP case
Hadji, B., Martin, G., Dupuis, I., Campoy, É., & Patrice Degoulet, A. (2015) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.11.016 · Cited by 42
Hobson, E., Fazal, S., Shaw, P. J., & McDermott, C. J. (2017) · Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration · doi:10.1080/21678421.2017.1288253 · Cited by 31
Vichitvanichphong, S., Talaei-Khoei, A., Kerr, D., & Ghapanchi, A. (2018) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp-03-2017-0090 · Cited by 24
Harte, R., Hall, T., Glynn, L. G., Rodríguez‐Molinero, A., Scharf, T., Quinlan, L. R., & OLaighin, G. M. (2018) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/humanfactors.7718 · Cited by 31
Babamiri, M., Heidarimoghadam, R., Ghasemi, F., Tapak, L., & Mortezapour, A. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0268942 · Cited by 30
Olsson, A.-K., Skovdahl, K., & Engström, M. (2016) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-016-0183-8 · Cited by 36
Illuminating Privacy and Security Concerns in Older Adults’ Technology Adoption
Knight, T., Yuan, X., & Gayle, D. B. (2022) · Work Aging and Retirement · doi:10.1093/workar/waac032 · Cited by 30
Bolster‐Foucault, C., Vedel, I., Busa, G., Hacker, G., Sourial, N., & Quesnel‐Vallée, A. (2024) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/afae166 · Cited by 36
Older Adults' and Caregivers' Perspectives on In-Home Monitoring Technology
Epstein, I., Aligato, A., Krimmel, T., & Mihailidis, A. (2016) · Journal of Gerontological Nursing · doi:10.3928/00989134-20160308-02 · Cited by 30
Scoping Review of the Literature on Smart Healthcare for Older Adults
Ji, Y.-A., & Kim, H.-S. (2022) · Yonsei Medical Journal · doi:10.3349/ymj.2022.63.s14 · Cited by 32
Wegener, E. K., Bergschöld, J. M., Whitmore, C., Winters, M., & Kayser, L. (2022) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/37785 · Cited by 30
Are Older Adults Special in Adopting Public eHealth Service Initiatives? The Modified Model of UTAUT
Lu, C.-C., & Tsai-Lin, T.-F. (2024) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440241228639 · Cited by 29
Can Smart Home Technology Deliver on the Promise of Independent Living?
Peek, S. T. M., Aarts, S., & Wouters, E. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-01583-5_41 · Cited by 29
Self-citationOrellano-Colón, E. M., Mann, W. C., Rivero‐Méndez, M., Torres, M., Jutai, J. W., Santiago, A., & Varas, N. (2015) · Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities · doi:10.1007/s40615-015-0186-8 · Cited by 29
Berner, J., Aartsen, M., & Deeg, D. J. H. (2017) · Health Informatics Journal · doi:10.1177/1460458217720398 · Cited by 28
Drivers and inhibitors adopting renewable energy: an empirical study in Malaysia
Zahari, A. R., & Esa, E. (2018) · International Journal of Energy Sector Management · doi:10.1108/ijesm-02-2017-0004 · Cited by 32
The contribution of healthcare smart homes to older peoples' wellbeing: A new conceptual framework
Creaney, R., Reid, L., & Currie, M. J. B. (2021) · Wellbeing Space and Society · doi:10.1016/j.wss.2021.100031 · Cited by 29
Barriers and Benefits of Information Communication Technologies Used by Health Care Aides
Perez, H., Neubauer, N., Marshall, S. D., Philip, S., Cruz, A. M., & Liu, L. (2022) · Applied Clinical Informatics · doi:10.1055/s-0042-1743238 · Cited by 39
A Qualitative Approach to the Public Perception of AI
Hick, A., & Ziefle, M. (2022) · International Journal on Cybernetics & Informatics · doi:10.5121/ijci.2022.110401 · Cited by 30
Global Research Trends on Smart Homes for Older Adults: Bibliometric and Scientometric Analyses
Hong, Y.-K., Wang, Z., & Cho, J. Y. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph192214821 · Cited by 34
Prerequisites for a healthy and independent life among older people: a Delphi study
Gusdal, A. K., Johansson‐Pajala, R., Zander, V., & Wågert, P. V. H. (2020) · Ageing and Society · doi:10.1017/s0144686x20000306 · Cited by 29
Esmaeilzadeh, P., & Maddah, M. (2024) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102689 · Cited by 29
Saare, M. A., Hussain, A., & Yue, W. S. (2019) · International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM) · doi:10.3991/ijim.v13i10.11285 · Cited by 28
Wilkowska, W., Offermann, J., Flórez‐Revuelta, F., & Ziefle, M. (2021) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2021.1888487 · Cited by 30
Deep Learning for Walking Behaviour Detection in Elderly People Using Smart Footwear
Aznar-Gimeno, R., Labata-Lezaun, G., Adell, A., Abadía, D., Alonso, R. D. H., & González-Muñoz, C. (2021) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e23060777 · Cited by 28
Chu, C. H., Yee, A. V., & Stamatopoulos, V. (2022) · Journal of Applied Gerontology · doi:10.1177/07334648221081850 · Cited by 28
Rahdar, S., Montazeri, M., Mirzaee, M., & Ahmadian, L. (2023) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105203 · Cited by 28
Building Technology adoption model for the success of Women Healthcare Workers
Shahi, A., Kaur, S., Mittal, A., & Singh, S. V. (2022) · International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Informatics (IC3I) · doi:10.1109/ic3i56241.2022.10073124 · Cited by 27
Telecare – where, when, why and for whom does it work? A realist evaluation of a Norwegian project
Berge, M. S. (2017) · Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering · doi:10.1177/2055668317693737 · Cited by 27
Stutzel, M. C., Filippo, M. P., Sztajnberg, A., da Costa, R. M. E. M., Brites, A. D. S., da Motta, L. B., & Caldas, C. P. (2019) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-019-0839-3 · Cited by 29
Mishra, R. K., Park, C., Momin, A. S., Rafaei, N. E., Kunik, M. E., York, M. K., & Najafi, B. (2022) · Gerontology · doi:10.1159/000526219 · Cited by 27
Does power posing affect gerontechnology adoption among older adults?
Teh, P., Lim, W. M., Ahmed, P. K., Chan, A. H. S., Loo, J. M. Y., Cheong, S.-N., & Yap, W.-J. (2016) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2016.1175508 · Cited by 27
Telehealth in older adults with cancer in the United States: The emerging use of wearable sensors
Shen, J., & Naeim, A. (2017) · Journal of Geriatric Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.jgo.2017.08.008 · Cited by 28
Seinsche, J., de Bruin, E. D., Saibene, E., Rizzo, F., Carpinella, I., Ferrarin, M., Moza, S., Ritter, T., & Giannouli, E. (2023) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/48845 · Cited by 26
Factors related to the use of a head-mounted display for individuals with low vision
Lorenzini, M.-C., Hämäläinen, A., & Wittich, W. (2019) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638288.2019.1704892 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Peek, S. T. M., Wouters, E. J. M., van Hoof, J., Luijkx, K. G., Boeije, H. R., & Vrijhoef, H. J. M.
- Affiliations
- Tilburg University (NL)
- Fontys University of Applied Sciences (NL)
- Utrecht University (NL)
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- Corresponding author
- Peek, Sebastiaan T.M.
- ORCID
- Venue
- International Journal of Medical Informatics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-04
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 235-248
- ISSN
- 1386-5056 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2105499459
- Cited by
- 1,206
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 159 · 2025: 117 · 2024: 95 · 2023: 120 · 2022: 105 · 2021: 120 · 2020: 129 · 2019: 91 · 2018: 103 · 2017: 70 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 10
- FWCI
- 19.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Medical Informatics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (acceptedVersion)
- Research portal (Tilburg University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science (OCW) (PRO-3-37)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Technology Use by Older Adults
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
- Keywords
- technology acceptance, aging in place, community-dwelling older adults, electronic health technology, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, privacy concerns, usability, social influence, family caregivers, safety technology, technology adoption
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Attitude to Computers, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Technology Assessment, Biomedical, Independent Living
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
