Concurrence of big data analytics and healthcare: a systematic review
Abstract
Background The application of Big Data analytics in healthcare has immense potential for improving the quality of care, reducing waste and error, and reducing the cost of care. Purpose This systematic review of literature aims to determine the scope of Big Data analytics in healthcare including its applications and challenges in its adoption in healthcare. It also intends to identify the strategies to overcome the challenges. Data sources A systematic search of the articles was carried out on five major scientific databases: ScienceDirect, PubMed, Emerald, IEEE Xplore and Taylor & Francis. The articles on Big Data analytics in healthcare published in English language literature from January 2013 to January 2018 were considered. Study selection Descriptive articles and usability studies of Big Data analytics in healthcare and medicine were selected. Data extraction Two reviewers independently extracted information on definitions of Big Data analytics; sources and applications of Big Data analytics in healthcare; challenges and strategies to overcome the challenges in healthcare. Results A total of 58 articles were selected as per the inclusion criteria and analyzed. The analyses of these articles found that: (1) researchers lack consensus about the operational definition of Big Data in healthcare; (2) Big Data in healthcare comes from the internal sources within the hospitals or clinics as well external sources including government, laboratories, pharma companies, data aggregators, medical journals etc.; (3) natural language processing (NLP) is most widely used Big Data analytical technique for healthcare and most of the processing tools used for analytics are based on Hadoop; (4) Big Data analytics finds its application for clinical decision support; optimization of clinical operations and reduction of cost of care (5) major challenge in adoption of Big Data analytics is non-availability of evidence of its practical benefits in healthcare. Conclusion This review study unveils that there is a paucity of information on evidence of real-world use of Big Data analytics in healthcare. This is because, the usability studies have considered only qualitative approach which describes potential benefits but does not take into account the quantitative study. Also, majority of the studies were from developed countries which brings out the need for promotion of research on Healthcare Big Data analytics in developing countries.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The quality of articles selected for the final sample was assessed to ensure that the outcomes of the current systematic literature review presented transparent and unbiased results.
“The quality of articles selected for the final sample was assessed to ensure that the outcomes of the current SLR presented transparent and unbiased results (Behera et al., 2019;Mehta & Pandit, 2018).”
From Blockchain in healthcare: A systematic literature review, synthesizing framework and future research agenda (2020) · cites this paper as Mehta & Pandit, 2018
Cites
Big data analytics in healthcare: promise and potential
Raghupathi, W., & Raghupathi, V. (2014) · Health Information Science and Systems · doi:10.1186/2047-2501-2-3 · Cited by 3,034 · see citing works
Krumholz, H. M. (2014) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0053 · Cited by 589 · see citing works
Tutorial: Big Data Analytics: Concepts, Technologies, and Applications
Watson, H. J. (2014) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.03465 · Cited by 340 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions
Alzubaidi, L., Zhang, J., Humaidi, A. J., Al-Dujaili, A., Duan, Y., Al-Shamma, O., Santamaría, J., Fadhel, M. A., Al-Amidie, M., & Farhan, L. (2021) · Journal of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-021-00444-8 · Cited by 7,906 · see citing works
Medical 4.0 technologies for healthcare: Features, capabilities, and applications
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Pratap Singh, R., & Suman, R. (2022) · Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems · doi:10.1016/j.iotcps.2022.04.001 · Cited by 468 · see citing works
Tandon, A., Dhir, A., Islam, A. K. M. N., & Mäntymäki, M. (2020) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2020.103290 · Cited by 439 · see citing works
Pham, Q.-V., Nguyen, D. C., Huynh-The, T., Hwang, W.-J., & Pathirana, P. N. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3009328 · Cited by 413 · see citing works
Ahmad, S., Shakeel, I., Mehfuz, S., & Ahmad, J. (2023) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2023.100568 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Ghaleb, E. A. A., Dominic, P. D. D., Fati, S. M., Muneer, A., & Ali, R. F. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13158379 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Yuan, H., Yu, K., Xie, F., Liu, M., & Sun, S. (2024) · Medicine Advances · doi:10.1002/med4.75 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Chang, B., Geng, Z., Mei, J., Wang, Z., Chen, P., Jiang, Y., & Niu, C. (2024) · Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.neurot.2024.e00471 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Ahmed, M. K., Rozario, E., Mohonta, S. C., Ferdousmou, J., Saimon, A. S. M., Moniruzzaman, M., Manik, M. M. T. G., & Hasan, R. (2025) · Journal of Engineering · doi:10.1155/je/9928467 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mehta, N., & Pandit, A.
- Affiliations
- Symbiosis International University (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Mehta, Nishita
- Venue
- International Journal of Medical Informatics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 114
- Pages
- 57-65
- ISSN
- 1386-5056 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2793682084
- Cited by
- 494
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 90 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 12
- FWCI
- 10.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Medical Informatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Big Data Technologies and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- big data analytics, health care, clinical decision support, natural language processing, Hadoop, technology adoption barriers, developing countries
- MeSH terms
- Big Data, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Medical Record Linkage, Quality of Health Care, Decision Support Systems, Clinical, Data Mining, Electronic Health Records, Meaningful Use, Datasets as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review