Cited by 494Artificial Intelligence in HealthcareBig Data Technologies and ApplicationsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Concurrence of big data analytics and healthcare: a systematic review

Mehta, Nishita, Pandit, Anil·2018·International Journal of Medical Informatics

Abstract

Background The application of Big Data analytics in healthcare has immense potential for improving the quality of care, reducing waste and error, and reducing the cost of care. Purpose This systematic review of literature aims to determine the scope of Big Data analytics in healthcare including its applications and challenges in its adoption in healthcare. It also intends to identify the strategies to overcome the challenges. Data sources A systematic search of the articles was carried out on five major scientific databases: ScienceDirect, PubMed, Emerald, IEEE Xplore and Taylor & Francis. The articles on Big Data analytics in healthcare published in English language literature from January 2013 to January 2018 were considered. Study selection Descriptive articles and usability studies of Big Data analytics in healthcare and medicine were selected. Data extraction Two reviewers independently extracted information on definitions of Big Data analytics; sources and applications of Big Data analytics in healthcare; challenges and strategies to overcome the challenges in healthcare. Results A total of 58 articles were selected as per the inclusion criteria and analyzed. The analyses of these articles found that: (1) researchers lack consensus about the operational definition of Big Data in healthcare; (2) Big Data in healthcare comes from the internal sources within the hospitals or clinics as well external sources including government, laboratories, pharma companies, data aggregators, medical journals etc.; (3) natural language processing (NLP) is most widely used Big Data analytical technique for healthcare and most of the processing tools used for analytics are based on Hadoop; (4) Big Data analytics finds its application for clinical decision support; optimization of clinical operations and reduction of cost of care (5) major challenge in adoption of Big Data analytics is non-availability of evidence of its practical benefits in healthcare. Conclusion This review study unveils that there is a paucity of information on evidence of real-world use of Big Data analytics in healthcare. This is because, the usability studies have considered only qualitative approach which describes potential benefits but does not take into account the quantitative study. Also, majority of the studies were from developed countries which brings out the need for promotion of research on Healthcare Big Data analytics in developing countries.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.03.013

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The quality of articles selected for the final sample was assessed to ensure that the outcomes of the current systematic literature review presented transparent and unbiased results.

    “The quality of articles selected for the final sample was assessed to ensure that the outcomes of the current SLR presented transparent and unbiased results (Behera et al., 2019;Mehta & Pandit, 2018).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mehta, N., & Pandit, A.
Affiliations
Symbiosis International University (IN)
Corresponding author
Mehta, Nishita
Venue
International Journal of Medical Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
114
Pages
57-65
ISSN
1386-5056 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2793682084
Cited by
494
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 90 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 12
FWCI
10.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Medical Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Big Data Technologies and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
big data analytics, health care, clinical decision support, natural language processing, Hadoop, technology adoption barriers, developing countries
MeSH terms
Big Data, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Medical Record Linkage, Quality of Health Care, Decision Support Systems, Clinical, Data Mining, Electronic Health Records, Meaningful Use, Datasets as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review