Cited by 97Mental Health and Patient InvolvementPsychometric Methodologies and TestingSchizophrenia research and treatment

Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) for people with chronic mental illness: scale development

Chiba, Rie, Miyamoto, Yuki, Kawakami, Norito·2010·International Journal of Nursing Studies

Abstract

Background Recovery is defined as a complex process of developing new meaning and purpose in life as one grows beyond the catastrophic effects of mental illness. To promote this process, the necessity of recovery assessment using psychometric measures has been emphasized; however, no measure to assess the individual recovery process is available in Japan.Objective To develop a Japanese version of the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) and to examine its reliability and validity.Design The study was a cross-sectional questionnaire survey.Settings Participants came from 1 daycare, 1 outpatient clinic of a psychiatric hospital, 5 sheltered workshops used for social rehabilitation, 3 peer support groups, and 6 inpatient wards of 2 psychiatric hospitals.Participants The survey included 237 participants who had chronic mental illness and were aged 20 or older. For analysis, we used data from 209 participants who had no missing values on the RAS, with 58.9% male and a mean age of 48.3 years.Methods The questionnaire consisted of the Japanese version of the 24-item RAS, developed by the authors with focus group cognitive interviews and the translation-back-translation procedure. Also included were the Herth Hope Index, Empowerment scale, Resilience scale, SF-8, and BASIS-32. Internal consistency reliability was assessed by Cronbach's alpha coefficients, and test-retest reliability was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and weighted kappa in a randomly selected subsample (n=24). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and correlations with other scales were used to examine the factor-based validity, concurrent and construct validity of the RAS.Results Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.89 for the overall RAS. ICC and weighted kappa generally indicated good test-retest reliability. Factor analysis of the RAS items yielded five factors: (a) goal/success orientation and hope, (b) reliance on others, (c) personal confidence, (d) no domination by symptoms, and (e) willingness to ask for help. The item "Coping with mental illness is no longer the main focus of my life" showed an inverse factor loading. The overall RAS score significantly and positively correlated with the Herth Hope Index, Empowerment scale, Resilience scale, and SF-8 mental component summary; there was a significant negative correlation with BASIS-32 psychiatric symptoms and functional impairment (p<0.01).Conclusion This study confirmed the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the 24-item RAS among people with chronic mental illness currently living in communities and inpatient ward settings in Japan.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.07.006

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chiba, R., Miyamoto, Y., & Kawakami, N.
Affiliations
The University of Tokyo (JP)
Corresponding author
Chiba, Rie
Venue
International Journal of Nursing Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-03
Volume
47
Issue
3
Pages
314-322
ISSN
0020-7489 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2043921732
Cited by
97
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
6.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Nursing Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Yuumi Memorial Foundation for Home Health Care
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (19791744)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
Recovery Assessment Scale, mental health recovery, chronic mental illness, Japanese translation, scale development, psychometric validation, hope, empowerment, resilience, social functioning, functional disability, psychiatric symptoms, cross-cultural adaptation, cognitive interviewing, test-retest reliability, factor structure, Herth Hope Index, empowerment scale, Resilience Scale
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude to Health, Mental Disorders, Chronic Disease, Cross-Sectional Studies, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Japan, Male, Middle Aged, Morale, Nursing Assessment, Power, Psychological, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self-Assessment, Social Support, Nursing Evaluation Research, Chi-Square Distribution, Self Efficacy, Resilience, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review