Cited by 286Sleep and Work-Related FatigueWorkplace Health and Well-beingHospital Admissions and Outcomes

Characteristics of shift work and their impact on employee performance and wellbeing: A literature review

Dall’Ora, Chiara, Ball, Jane, Recio-Saucedo, Alejandra, Griffiths, Peter·2016·International Journal of Nursing Studies

Abstract

Objectives To identify the characteristics of shift work that have an effect on employee's performance (including job performance, productivity, safety, quality of care delivered, errors, adverse events and client satisfaction) and wellbeing (including burnout, job satisfaction, absenteeism, intention to leave the job) in all sectors including healthcare.Design A scoping review of the literature was undertaken.Data sources We searched electronic databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsychINFO, SCOPUS) to identify primary quantitative studies.Review methods The search was conducted between January and March 2015. Studies were drawn from all occupational sectors (i.e. health and non health), meeting the inclusion criteria: involved participants aged ≥18 who have been working shifts or serve as control group for others working shifts, exploring the association of characteristics of shift work with at least one of the selected outcomes. Reference lists from retrieved studies were checked to identify any further studies.Results 35 studies were included in the review; 25 studies were performed in the health sector. A variety of shift work characteristics are associated with compromised employee's performance and wellbeing. Findings from large multicentre studies highlight that shifts of 12h or longer are associated with jeopardised outcomes. Working more than 40h per week is associated with adverse events, while no conclusive evidence was found regarding working a 'Compressed Working Week'; working overtime was associated with decreased job performance. Working rotating shifts was associated with worse job performance outcomes, whilst fixed night shifts appeared to enable resynchronisation. However, job satisfaction of employees working fixed nights was reduced. Timely breaks had a positive impact on employee fatigue and alertness, whilst quick returns between shifts appeared to increase pathologic fatigue. The effect of shift work characteristics on outcomes in the studies reviewed is consistent across occupational sectors.Conclusions This review highlighted the complexity that encompasses shift work, but many studies do not account for this complexity. While some consistent associations emerge (e.g. 12h shifts and jeopardised outcomes), it is not always possible to conclude that results are not confounded by unmeasured factors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.01.007

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dall'Ora et al's scoping review concluded that most studies evaluated one single characteristic and failed to take account of the many complex facets of shift work, so it was not possible to draw firm conclusions.

    “Although some large scale multicentre studies showed that 12 h shifts are associated with worse staff and patient outcomes, the authors concluded that most studies evaluated one single characteristic and failed to take account of the many complex facets of shift work. It was not therefore possible to draw firm conclusions as studies were often confounded by extraneous variables [27].”
  • Scoping reviews can be applied to better understand complex issues related to the health workforce, such as how shift work impacts employee performance across diverse occupational sectors.

    “Scoping reviews can also be applied to better understand complex issues related to the health workforce, such as how shift work impacts employee performance across diverse occupational sectors, which involves a diversity of evidence types as well as attention to knowledge gaps [31].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dall’Ora, C., Ball, J., Recio-Saucedo, A., & Griffiths, P.
Affiliations
National Institute for Health and Care Research (GB)
Corresponding author
Dall’Ora, Chiara
Venue
International Journal of Nursing Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-05
Volume
57
Pages
12-27
ISSN
0020-7489 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2253138815
Cited by
286
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 16
FWCI
2.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Nursing Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • Maritime Commons The Digital Repository of World Maritime University (World Maritime University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (13/114/17, HS&DR/13/114/17)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
Keywords
shift work, employee performance, employee well-being, burnout, job satisfaction, absenteeism, turnover intention, rotating shifts, shift length, overtime, fatigue, alertness, occupational safety, healthcare workers, adverse events, quality of care
MeSH terms
Burnout, Professional, Fatigue, Humans, Job Satisfaction, Personnel Turnover, Quality of Health Care, Work Schedule Tolerance, Patient Safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review