Cited by 54Sleep and Work-Related FatigueWorkplace Health and Well-beingOccupational Health and Safety Management

12-h or 8-h shifts It depends.

Ferguson, Sally A., Dawson, Drew·2012·Sleep Medicine Reviews

Abstract

Since 12-h shifts were first implemented, the question has been asked - are 'twelves' better than 'eights'? People trying to answer this question invariably refer to the limited literature at their disposal, often piecemeal, small-scale studies comparing 8-h versus 12-h shifts in isolated groups of workers in which many other factors vary concurrently. The narrow perspective and sometimes 'vested interests' of the organizations, researchers, publishers and individual workers can influence both the choice of measures, the analysis of results and their interpretation. The current review suggests that it is not sufficient to evaluate a shift pattern on the basis of a single dimension of a working time arrangement, such as shift length. Numerous factors associated with the work practice influence the outcome of a shift pattern including start times, pattern of shifts and amount of overtime. Moreover, the type of work being done and the demographics or characteristics of the workforce are additional mediating factors. Finally, and perhaps most critically, the relative importance assigned to different outcome measures is an important consideration. There are situations where total sleep time might increase following a change to 12-h shifts, whereas domestic life for some workers may deteriorate. Additionally, safety measures may show improvements on 8-h shifts but physical or psychological health outcomes may be worse. The myriad combinations of work pattern, work task, worker and outcome measure under investigation mean that the best way to take account of these complexities may be to use an approach that manages 'system' risk. Given the non-linearities in the system, and the fact that current approaches either ignore, or privilege a subset of outcomes, it is perhaps more appropriate to conceptualize working time arrangements as an 'ecosystem' and to address the risks in the overall system as opposed to a single dimension such as shift length.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.smrv.2011.11.001

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 72 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferguson, S. A., & Dawson, D.
Affiliations
University of South Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Ferguson, Sally A.
Venue
Sleep Medicine Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-12
Volume
16
Issue
6
Pages
519-528
ISSN
1087-0792 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980416133
Cited by
54
References
72
Citations by year
2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sleep Medicine Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Acquire (CQUniversity) (submittedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety Management
Keywords
shift length, 12-hour shifts, 8-hour shifts, working time arrangements, shift work, sleep duration, work-life balance, occupational safety, system risk, overtime, workforce demographics, outcome measures
MeSH terms
Humans, Occupational Medicine, Personnel Staffing and Scheduling, Sleep, Wakefulness, Work, Work Schedule Tolerance, Occupational Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review