Cited by 323Nursing education and managementHealthcare Education and Workforce IssuesOccupational Health and Burnout

The relationship between nurse practice environment, nurse work characteristics, burnout and job outcome and quality of nursing care: A cross-sectional survey

Van Bogaert, Peter, Kowalski, Christoph, Weeks, Susan Mace, Van heusden, Danny, Clarke, Sean P.·2013·International Journal of Nursing Studies

Abstract

Aim To explore the mechanisms through which nurse practice environment dimensions are associated with job outcomes and nurse-assessed quality of care. Mediating variables tested included nurse work characteristics of workload, social capital, decision latitude, as well as burnout dimensions of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment. Background Acute care hospitals face daily challenges to their efforts to achieve nurse workforce stability, safety, and quality of care. A body of knowledge shows a favourably rated nurse practice environment as an important condition for better nurse and patient outcome variables; however, further research initiatives are imperative for a clear understanding to support and guide the practice community. Design Cross-sectional survey. Method Grounded on previous empirical findings, a structural equation model designed with valid measurement instruments was tested. The study population was registered acute care nurses (N=1201) in two independent hospitals and one hospital group with six hospitals in Belgium. Results Nurse practice environment dimensions predicted job outcome variables and nurse ratings of quality of care. Analyses were consistent with features of nurses' work characteristics including perceived workload, decision latitude, and social capital, as well as three dimension of burnout playing mediating roles between nurse practice environment and outcomes. A revised model adjusted using various fit measures explained 52% and 47% of job outcomes and nurse-assessed quality of care, respectively. Conclusion The study refines understanding of the relationship between aspects of nursing practice in order to achieve favourable nursing outcomes and offers important concepts for managers to track in their daily work. The findings of this study indicate that it is important for clinicians and leaders to consider how nurses are involved in decision-making about care processes and tracking outcomes of care and whether they are able to work with physicians, superiors, peers, and subordinates in a trusting environment based on shared values. The involvement of nurse managers at the unit level is especially critical because of associations with nurse work characteristics such as decision latitude and social capital and outcome variables. Further practice and research initiatives to support nurses' involvement in decision-making process and interdisciplinary teamwork are recommended.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.05.010

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Decision latitude impacts Personal Accomplishment only.

    “Decision latitude impacted Personal Accomplishment only [36]”

    From Burnout in nursing: a theoretical review. (2020) · cites this paper as [36]

  • Quality of relationship with physicians indirectly supports Personal Accomplishment.

    “one concluded that quality of relationship with physicians indirectly supported PA [36]”

    From Burnout in nursing: a theoretical review. (2020) · cites this paper as [36]

  • In a later study, support from managers only predicted high Personal Accomplishment.

    “but in a later study, it only predicted high Personal Accomplishment [36]”

    From Burnout in nursing: a theoretical review. (2020) · cites this paper as [36]

  • In one instance, no associations were found between any of the burnout dimensions and quality of care.

    “In one instance, no associations were found between any of the burnout dimensions and quality of care [36]”

    From Burnout in nursing: a theoretical review. (2020) · cites this paper as [36]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Bogaert, P., Kowalski, C., Weeks, S. M., Van heusden, D., & Clarke, S. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Cologne (DE)
  • Texas Christian University (US)
  • McGill University (CA)
Venue
International Journal of Nursing Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-12
Volume
50
Issue
12
Pages
1667-1677
ISSN
0020-7489 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1996348417
Cited by
323
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 2
FWCI
60.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Nursing Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
Keywords
nursing work environment, nurse burnout, nursing care quality, workload, social capital, job control, emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, personal accomplishment, job outcomes, interdisciplinary teamwork, acute care nurses, nurse managers
MeSH terms
Belgium, Burnout, Professional, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Nursing Process, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Quality of Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review