Cited by 70Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsPsychiatric care and mental health servicesElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

The experience of involuntary detention in acute psychiatric care. A review and synthesis of qualitative studies

Seed, Tara, Fox, John R.E., Berry, Katherine·2016·International Journal of Nursing Studies

Abstract

Objective To build on a previous review and updated understanding of how patients experience involuntary detention for their mental health difficulties.Design We provide a narrative synthesis review of qualitative studies.Data sources Using pre-defined search terms, the following databases were searched covering the period 2006 to March 2014: Psychinfo, Medline, Medline In-Process, Embase, Web of Knowledge, Scopus, Science Direct, British Nursing Index and Cinahl Plus. Three journals were electronically hand-searched.Review methods The search resulted in the retrieval of 6230 records which were screened by title. Relevant studies were then screened by abstract and further articles were read for full text. References of articles read for full text were screened using an inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of fifteen studies were identified and a quality evaluation tool was applied to each study. Themes and constructs from all fifteen studies were coded and synthesised.Results Seven overarching themes emerged. 'Sanctuary', 'loss of normality and perceived independence', 'feeling terrified' and 'fluctuating emotions' illustrate the experiences of involuntary detention. The remaining themes reflect the factors that influence these experiences: 'a continuum of person-centred practice', 'disempowerment' and 'intra-psychic coping'.Conclusions Participants varied in how they experienced involuntary detention. Some people experienced a sense of sanctuary, whereas others experienced loss, fear and trauma. People's experiences were influenced by the degree of actual or perceived person-centred and empowering care, which also had an impact on their coping style. Development of a therapeutic bond with clinicians was a key factor which influenced positive experiences of involuntary detention. The implications of the findings are discussed with reference to existing literature and recommendations are made for clinical practice. Ideas for future research are identified.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.05.014

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seed, T., Fox, J. R. E., & Berry, K.
Affiliations
University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Berry, Katherine
Venue
International Journal of Nursing Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-09
Volume
61
Pages
82-94
ISSN
0020-7489 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2417073209
Cited by
70
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5
FWCI
0.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Nursing Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
involuntary detention, acute psychiatric care, patient experience, sanctuaries, fear, trauma, person-centred care, disempowerment, coping, therapeutic relationship, psychiatric inpatients
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Male

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review