Cited by 91Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsPsychiatric care and mental health servicesElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

Impact of coercive measures on life stories: qualitative study

Open access
Sibitz, Ingrid, Scheutz, Alexandra, Lakeman, Richard, Schrank, Beate, Schaffer, Markus, Amering, Michaela·2011·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: How people integrate the experience of involuntary hospital admission and treatment into their life narrative has not been explored systematically. Aims: To establish a typology of coercion perspectives and styles of integration into life stories. Method: Transcripts of recorded interviews with 15 persons who had previously been involuntarily admitted to hospital were coded and analysed thematically using a modified grounded theory approach. Results: With hindsight, people viewed the experience of involuntary hospital admission as a ‘necessary emergency brake’, an ‘unnecessary overreaction’ or a ‘practice in need of improvement’. With respect to how they integrated the experience into their life narratives, participants viewed it as ‘over and not to be recalled’, a ‘life-changing experience’ or a ‘motivation for political engagement’. Conclusions: The participants' diverse and differentiated perspectives on coercive measures and their different styles of integration suggest that people may come to accept coercive measures as necessary when confronted with danger to self or others. However, the implementation of coercion needs to be improved substantially to counteract possible long-term adverse effects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.110.087841

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • El régimen de internaciones forzosas transmite un mensaje social que establece o refuerza un estereotipo negativo fundado en un supuesto vínculo entre la discapacidad mental y un comportamiento peligroso, tanto en términos sociales como personales.

    “Todavía más, transmite un mensaje social que establece o refuerza un estereotipo negativo fundado en un supuesto vínculo entre la discapacidad mental y un comportamiento peligroso, tanto en términos sociales como personales 70 .”

    From El derecho a la vivienda adecuada de las personas con discapacidad mental en Chile (2023) · cites this paper as Sibitz et al. (2011), pp.239-244.

    The section “Styles of integration and effects of admission” (page unavailable) reports stigma and discrimination after involuntary admission, including being treated as less credible or reliable. It does not say that forced admission conveys a social message linking mental disability with dangerous behavior, so the specific stereotype asserted in the claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Lutzen K. Subtle coercion in psychiatric practice. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 1998; 5: 101-7.
  2. Wynn R. Coercion in psychiatric care: clinical, legal and ethical controversies. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract 2006; 10: 247-51.
  3. Katsakou C, Priebe S. Outcomes of involuntary hospital admission -a review. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2006; 114: 232-41.
  4. Link B, Castille DM, Stuber J. Stigma and coercion in the context of outpatient treatment for people with mental illnesses. Soc Sci Med 2008; 67: 409-19.
  5. Katsakou C, Priebe S. Patients' experiences of involuntary hospital admission and treatment: a review of qualitative studies. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc 2007; 16: 172-8.
  6. Holmes D, Kennedy SL, Perron A. The mentally ill and social exclusion: a critical examination of the use of seclusion from the patient's perspective. Issues Ment Health Nurs 2004; 25: 559-78.
  7. Kuosmanen L, Hatonen H, Malkavaara H, Kylma J, Valimaki M. Deprivation of liberty in psychiatric hospital care: the patient's perspective. Nurs Ethics 2007; 14: 597-607.
  8. Olofsson B, Norberg A. Experiences of coercion in psychiatric care as narrated by patients, nurses and physicians. J Adv Nurs 2001; 33: 89-97.
  9. Thogersen MH, Morthorst B, Nordentoft M. Perceptions of coercion in the community: a qualitative study of patients in a Danish assertive community treatment team. Psychiatr Q 2010; 81: 35-47.
  10. Wynn R. Psychiatric inpatients' experiences with restraint. J Forens Psychiatry Psychol 2004; 15: 124-44.
  11. Estroff SE. Self, identity, and subjective experiences of schizophrenia: in search of the subject. Schizophr Bull 1989; 15: 189-96.
  12. Davidson L, Strauss JS. Sense of self in recovery from severe mental illness. Br J Med Psychol 1992; 65: 131-45.
  13. Priebe S, Katsakou C, Amos T, Leese M, Morriss R, Rose D, et al. Patients' views and readmissions 1 year after involuntary hospitalisation. Br J Psychiatry 2009; 194: 49-54.
  14. Priebe S, Katsakou C, Glo ¨ckner M, Dembinskas A, Fiorillo A, Karastergiou A, et al. Patients' views of involuntary hospital admission after 1 and 3 months: prospective study in 11 European countries. Br J Psychiatry 2010; 196: 179-85.
  15. O'Hagan M. Force in mental health services: international user/survivor perspectives. Mental Health Practice 2004; 7: 12-7.
  16. O'Brien AJ, Golding CG. Coercion in mental healthcare: the principle of least coercive care. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2003; 10: 167-73.
  17. Amering M, Schmolke M. Recovery in Mental Health: Reshaping Scientific and Clinical Responsibilities. Wiley, 2009.
  18. Thornicroft G, Brohan E, Rose D, Sartorius N, Leese M. Global pattern of experienced and anticipated discrimination against people with schizophrenia: a cross-sectional survey. Lancet 2009; 373: 408-15.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sibitz, I., Scheutz, A., Lakeman, R., Schrank, B., Schaffer, M., & Amering, M.
Affiliations
  • Medical University of Vienna (AT)
  • Dublin City University (IE)
Corresponding author
Sibitz, Ingrid
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2011-09
Volume
199
Issue
3
Pages
239-244
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2128138729
Cited by
91
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cross Connect (Southern Cross University) (submittedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
coercive measures, involuntary admission, life stories, lived experience, mental health law, political participation
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Mental Disorders, Coercion, Commitment of Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Commitment of Mentally Ill, Dangerous Behavior, Female, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Middle Aged, Professional-Patient Relations, Restraint, Physical, Self Concept, Patient Satisfaction, Trust, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review