Cited by 128Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchSchizophrenia research and treatmentPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

PTSD symptoms associated with the experiences of psychosis and hospitalisation: a review of the literature.

Berry, Katherine, Ford, Sarah, Jellicoe-Jones, Lorna, Haddock, Gillian·2013·Clinical Psychology Review

Abstract

There is evidence of high rates of PTSD in people with psychosis, but the influence that symptoms or hospitalisation have on PTSD in individuals with psychosis is less clear. This paper reviewed studies investigating the prevalence of PTSD induced as a result of the experience of psychosis and hospitalisation and factors that might influence its development. The review included 24 studies, published between 1980 and 2011. Studies showed high levels of PTSD resulting from the trauma of symptoms and/or hospitalisation, with prevalence rates for actual PTSD resulting from these traumas varying from 11% to 67%. In line with studies of PTSD related to other traumatic events, there were inconsistent associations between PTSD and severity of positive and negative symptoms, but there were consistent associations between affective symptoms and PTSD. There were also inconsistent associations between hospital experiences and PTSD. Consistent with the general PTSD literature, there was some evidence that psychosis-related PTSD was associated with trauma history. There was also some emerging evidence that psychological variables, such as appraisals and coping style may influence psychosis-related PTSD. The review highlights the need for further research into psychological mechanisms that could increase vulnerability to psychosis-related PTSD and treatment approaches.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpr.2013.01.011

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many narrators in the study described psychiatric admissions as traumatic.

    “In correspondence with previous studies (15, 16, 31), many narrators in our study described psychiatric admissions as traumatic.”

    From Making meaning of trauma in psychosis (2023) · cites this paper as [15]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berry, K., Ford, S., Jellicoe-Jones, L., & Haddock, G.
Affiliations
University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Berry, Katherine
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-06
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
526-538
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2038027854
Cited by
128
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8
FWCI
1.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, psychosis, hospitalization, trauma, PTSD prevalence, positive and negative symptoms, affective symptoms, trauma history, coping styles
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Hospitalization, Humans, Psychotic Disorders, Risk Factors, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review