Cited by 246Occupational Health and BurnoutStress and Burnout ResearchHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnout

Burnout and depression in nurses: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Chen, Chiahui, Meier, Scott T.·2021·International Journal of Nursing Studies

Abstract

Background Nurses work in stressful and demanding settings and often suffer from depression and burnout. Despite overlapping symptoms, research has been inconclusive regarding the discriminant validity of measures of burnout with regard to measures of depression. Such inconclusive discriminant validity might cause clinicians to fail to recognize and manage depression separately from burnout.Objectives This meta-analysis aimed to clarify the distinctiveness of burnout as a separate construct by examining the size of the relationship between burnout and depression among nurses as well as potential moderators.Method A stepwise method was used by searching 4 databases (PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and EMBASE) to retrieve published papers in English examining the relationship between burnout and depression among nurses and reporting the effect sizes of their findings.Results We identified a total of 37 eligible studies. The pooled estimate showed a positive association between burnout and depression among nurses (r = 0.403, 95% CI [0.327, 0.474], p < 0.0001) and a slightly higher correlation coefficient for the Emotional Exhaustion subscale of the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) measure (0.494, 95% CI [0.41, 0.57]).Conclusions and implications This review confirms a large burnout - depression correlation in nursing samples, adding to existing literature encompassing a variety of occupations. Future studies should focus on path analysis to assess the causal relationship as well as investigate potential moderators.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104099

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, C., & Meier, S. T.
Affiliations
University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Chen, Chiahui
Venue
International Journal of Nursing Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-12
Volume
124
Pages
104099
ISSN
0020-7489 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3203781834
Cited by
246
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 1
FWCI
7.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2022-03-01)
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Nursing Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Keywords
burnout, depression, nurses, emotional exhaustion, Maslach Burnout Inventory, discriminant validity, occupational stress, nursing workforce
MeSH terms
Burnout, Psychological, Burnout, Professional, Depression, Emotions, Humans, Nurses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review