The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effectiveness of e-Health interventions on caregiver burden, depression, and quality of life in informal caregivers of patients with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Abstract
Background With the increasing incidence and survival rate of cancer, there are more people living with cancer, which increases the responsibilities of informal caregivers and results in a significant caregiver burden, depression, and low quality of life. The efficacy of e-Health interventions has already been proven in decreasing caregiver burden, addressing psychosocial concerns, and increasing quality of life among caregivers of patients with chronic diseases. However, the utilization of e-Health interventions on the informal caregivers of cancer patients is still limited and the effectiveness is unclear.Objectives To assess the impact of e-Health interventions on the caregiver burden, depression, and quality of life of informal caregivers of cancer patients.Methods A literature search was conducted in six electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CENTRAL, PsycInfo, and CINAHL Plus with Full Text) from the inception of the databases to 31 May 2021. Two authors independently screened the studies and extracted the data. Cochrane's bias risk tool for randomized controlled trials was used to examine the methodological quality of the included studies. The intervention effect was estimated by calculating the standard mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) with Review Manager 5.3. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to test the robustness of the pooled results.Results Seven randomized controlled trials with 326 participants were included in the review. The results of the meta-analysis showed that e-Health interventions could significantly improve the depression (SMD = -0.90, 95% CI [-1.76∼-0.04], P = 0.04) and quality of life (SMD = 0.45, 95% CI [0.13∼0.77], P = 0.006), but not caregiver burden (SMD = -0.29, 95% CI [-0.61∼0.02], P = 0.07) in informal caregivers. Sensitivity analysis showed that only the caregiver burden was stable.Conclusion e-Health interventions are a convenient method to support the informal caregivers of cancer patients, and can mitigate depression and enhance the quality of life of informal caregivers, but had no significant effect on easing the caregiver burden. In future, tailored e-Health intervention, based on informal caregivers' demographic characteristics and cultural context, is warranted to improve informal caregivers' well-being.Registration number CRD42021250253 (PROSPERO).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“a recent systematic review [32] identified that, compared to care as usual, e-Health interventions effectively reduced symptoms of depression and improved quality of life of caregivers of cancer survivors.”
In the citing paper
“However, it is important to note that these interventions did not significantly reduce the caregiver burden26,27.”
From Anxiety, depression, and quality of life of caregivers of palliative care patients with cancer (2025) · cites this paper as [26]
Citations
Cites
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., et al. (2021) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.n71 · Cited by 108,283
Caregiver Burden: A Clinical Review
Adelman, R. D., Tmanova, L. L., Delgado, D., Dion, S., & Lachs, M. S. (2014) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2014.304 · Cited by 2,002
Interventions with Family Caregivers of Cancer Patients: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
Northouse, L. L., Katapodi, M. C., Song, L., Zhang, L., & Mood, D. W. (2010) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.20081 · Cited by 857
The Impact of Caregiving on the Psychological Well-Being of Family Caregivers and Cancer Patients
Northouse, L. L., Katapodi, M. C., Schafenacker, A. M., & Weiss, D. (2012) · Seminars in Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.soncn.2012.09.006 · Cited by 428
Geng, H.-M., Chuang, D.-M., Yang, F., Yang, Y., Liu, W.-M., Liu, L.-H., & Tian, H.-M. (2018) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000011863 · Cited by 421
Telehealth utilization during the Covid-19 pandemic: a systematic review
Garfan, S., Alamoodi, A. H., Zaidan, B. B., Al-Zobbi, M., Hamid, R. A., Alwan, J. K., Ahmaro, I. Y. Y., Khalid, E. T., Jumaah, F. M., Albahri, O. S., et al. (2021) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104878 · Cited by 369
Care for the cancer caregiver: A systematic review
Applebaum, A. J., & Breitbart, W. (2013) · Palliative and Supportive Care · doi:10.1017/s1478951512000594 · Cited by 352
Informal caregiving for cancer patients
Romito, F., Goldzweig, G., Cormio, C., Hagedoorn, M., & Andersen, B. L. (2013) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.28057 · Cited by 254
The burden of psychosocial morbidity related to cancer: patient and family issues
Caruso, R., Nanni, M. G., Riba, M. B., Sabato, S., & Grassi, L. (2017) · International Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/09540261.2017.1288090 · Cited by 244
Quality of life and mental health in caregivers of outpatients with advanced cancer
Wadhwa, D., Burman, D., Swami, N., Rodin, G., Lo, C., & Zimmermann, C. (2011) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.2104 · Cited by 222
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Digital health and telehealth in cancer care: A scoping review of reviews
Shaffer, K. M., Turner, K. L., Siwik, C., Gonzalez, B. D., Upasani, R., Glazer, J. V., Ferguson, R. J., Joshua, C., & Low, C. A. (2023) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(23)00049-3 · Cited by 263
Cham, C. Q., Ibrahim, N., Siau, C. S., Kalaman, C. R., Ho, M. C., Yahya, A. N., Visvalingam, U., Roslan, S. B., Rahman, F. N. A., & Lee, K. W. (2022) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare10122423 · Cited by 166
Nysaeter, T. M., Olsson, C., Sandsdalen, T., Hov, R., & Larsson, M. (2024) · BMC Palliative Care · doi:10.1186/s12904-024-01350-5 · Cited by 60
Chen, Y., Li, L., Chen, X., Yan, Q., & Hu, X. (2025) · Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing · doi:10.1111/wvn.70048 · Cited by 40
Self-citationLiao, X., Wang, Z., Zeng, Q., & Zeng, Y. (2024) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/gps.6101 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, Y., Li, J., Zhang, Y., Ding, Y., & Hu, X.
- Affiliations
- Sichuan University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Hu, Xiaolin
- Venue
- International Journal of Nursing Studies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-03
- Volume
- 127
- Pages
- 104179
- ISSN
- 0020-7489 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4206107020
- Cited by
- 130
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 8
- FWCI
- 5.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Nursing Studies (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Sichuan University West China Hospital
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (82172842, 81803104)
- Sichuan University (2020HXBH119)
- Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province (2022SYSX0064)
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFE0206600)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing care and research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Keywords
- digital health interventions, informal caregivers, caregiver burden, depression, quality of life, cancer patients, caregiver well-being
- MeSH terms
- Caregiver Burden, Depression, Humans, Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Caregivers, Telemedicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review