Cited by 352Nursing care and researchCancer survivorship and carePalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

Care for the cancer caregiver: A systematic review

Open access
Applebaum, Allison J., Breitbart, William·2013·Palliative and Supportive Care

Abstract

Objective: Informal caregivers (ICs) are relatives, friends, and partners who have a significant relationship with and provide assistance (i.e., physical, emotional) to a patient with a life- threatening, incurable illness. The multidimensional burden that results from providing care to a patient with cancer is well documented, and as a result, a growing number of psychosocial interventions have been developed specifically to address this burden. The purpose of the present study was to characterize the state of the science of psychosocial interventions for informal cancer caregivers. Method: A comprehensive systematic review of interventions for cancer caregivers was conducted via an electronic literature search of publications between 1980 and January 13, 2011. A final sample of 49 interventions was reviewed in detail. Results: The interventions, which varied in terms of modality and patient population, fell into the following eight categories: psychoeducation, problem-solving/skills building interventions, supportive therapy, family/couples therapy, cognitive-behavioral therapy, interpersonal therapy, complementary and alternative medicine interventions, and existential therapy. Benefits and disadvantages of each of the categories are discussed, with special attention given to studies that produced null findings. Significance of results: Beyond specific techniques, structured, goal-oriented, and time-limited interventions that are integrative appear to be the most feasible and offer the greatest benefits for ICs of cancer patients. Future studies are needed to examine the specific benefits and challenges of delivering interventions in alternative modalities (Internet, Skype) so that the needs of a greater number of ICs may be addressed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1478951512000594

Cites

159 of 159 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Baider L Kaufman B Perez T 1996 Mutuality of fate: Adaptation and psychological distress in cancer patients and their partners Cancer and the Family Baider L Cooper CL De-Nour AK 173 186 New York Wiley
  2. Given B Wyatt G Given C 2004 Burden and depression among caregivers of patients with cancer at the end of life Oncology Nursing Forum 31 1105 1115 15547633 PMC1315286
  3. Institute of Medicine 2008 Retooling for an Aging America: Building the Health Care Workforce Washington, DC The National Academies Press 25009893

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Applebaum, A. J., & Breitbart, W.
Affiliations
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Applebaum, Allison J.
Venue
Palliative and Supportive Care
Published
2012-10-10
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
231-252
ISSN
  • 1478-9515 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-9523
OpenAlex
W1972917862
Cited by
352
References
159
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7
FWCI
2.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Palliative & Supportive Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R01CA128134, R01CA128187, P30CA008748, T32CA009461)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
informal caregivers, cancer caregivers, caregiver burden, psychosocial interventions, psychoeducation, problem-solving intervention, supportive therapy, family therapy, couple therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, interpersonal psychotherapy, complementary and alternative medicine, existential psychotherapy, caregiver support
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Complementary Therapies, Humans, Neoplasms, Psychotherapy, Social Support, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review