Cited by 115Language Development and DisordersNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

Auditory evoked fields predict language ability and impairment in children

Oram Cardy, Janis E., Flagg, Elissa J., Roberts, Wendy, Roberts, Timothy P.L.·2008·International Journal of Psychophysiology

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that a subgroup of children with autism show similarities to children with Specific Language Impairment (SLI) in the pattern of their linguistic impairments, but the source of this overlap is unclear. We examined the ability of auditory evoked magnetic fields to predict language and other developmental abilities in children and adolescents. Following standardized assessment of language ability, nonverbal IQ, and autism-associated behaviors, 110 trails of a tone were binaurally presented to 45 7-18 year olds who had typical development, autism (with LI), Asperger Syndrome (i.e., without LI), or SLI. Using a 151-channel MEG system, latency of left hemisphere (LH) and right hemisphere (RH) auditory M50 and M100 peaks was recorded. RH M50 latency (and to a lesser extent, RH M100 latency) predicted overall oral language ability, accounting for 36% of the variance. Nonverbal IQ and autism behavior ratings were not predicted by any of the evoked fields. Latency of the RH M50 was the best predictor of clinical LI (i.e., irrespective of autism diagnosis), and demonstrated 82% accuracy in predicting Receptive LI; a cutoff of 84.6 ms achieved 92% specificity and 70% sensitivity in classifying children with and without Receptive LI. Auditory evoked responses appear to reflect language functioning and impairment rather than non-specific brain (dys)function (e.g., IQ, behavior). RH M50 latency proved to be a relatively useful indicator of impaired language comprehension, suggesting that delayed auditory perceptual processing in the RH may be a key neural dysfunction underlying the overlap between subgroups of children with autism and SLI.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.10.015

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oram Cardy, J. E., Flagg, E. J., Roberts, W., & Roberts, T. P. L.
Affiliations
  • York University (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
Venue
International Journal of Psychophysiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-05
Volume
68
Issue
2
Pages
170-175
ISSN
0167-8760 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2009824095
Cited by
115
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 11
FWCI
10.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
auditory evoked magnetic fields, language impairment, autism spectrum disorder, Asperger syndrome, specific language impairment, receptive language impairment, language comprehension, nonverbal intelligence, children and adolescents
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adolescent, Auditory Pathways, Auditory Perception, Autistic Disorder, Cerebral Cortex, Child, Discrimination, Psychological, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Female, Humans, Language Development Disorders, Language Disorders, Functional Laterality, Male, Reference Values, ROC Curve, Magnetoencephalography, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review