Cited by 1,112Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersMultisensory perception and integration

Sensory Processing in Autism: A Review of Neurophysiologic Findings

Open access
MARCO, ELYSA J., HINKLEY, LEIGHTON B.N., HILL, SUSANNA S., NAGARAJAN, SRIKANTAN S.·2011·Pediatric Research

Abstract

Atypical sensory-based behaviors are a ubiquitous feature of autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). In this article, we review the neural underpinnings of sensory processing in autism by reviewing the literature on neurophysiological responses to auditory, tactile, and visual stimuli in autistic individuals. We review studies of unimodal sensory processing and multisensory integration that use a variety of neuroimaging techniques, including electroencephalography (EEG), magnetoencephalography (MEG), and functional MRI. We then explore the impact of covert and overt attention on sensory processing. With additional characterization, neurophysiologic profiles of sensory processing in ASD may serve as valuable biomarkers for diagnosis and monitoring of therapeutic interventions for autism and reveal potential strategies and target brain regions for therapeutic interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1203/pdr.0b013e3182130c54

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MARCO, E. J., HINKLEY, L. B. N., HILL, S. S., & NAGARAJAN, S. S.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
MARCO, ELYSA J.
Venue
Pediatric Research
Published
2011-05
Volume
69
Issue
5 Part 2
Pages
48R-54R
ISSN
0031-3998 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006079595
Cited by
1,112
References
100
Citations by year
2026: 118 · 2025: 115 · 2024: 83 · 2023: 99 · 2022: 87 · 2021: 101 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 71 · 2018: 75 · 2017: 67 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 15
FWCI
3.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pediatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH083890)
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC004855)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, sensory processing, multisensory integration, auditory processing, tactile processing, visual processing, attention, neurophysiological responses, biomarkers, therapeutic interventions
MeSH terms
Attention, Auditory Perceptual Disorders, Autistic Disorder, Humans, Visual Perception, Touch Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review