Cited by 37Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesVisual perception and processing mechanismsFace Recognition and Perception

Affective perception and imagery: a NIRS study.

Köchel, Angelika, Plichta, Michael M., Schäfer, Axel, Leutgeb, Verena, Scharmüller, Wilfried, Fallgatter, Andreas J., Schienle, Anne·2011·International Journal of Psychophysiology

Abstract

The activation of cortical attention networks during affective picture processing has been extensively studied, whereas little is known about affective imagery. It is still unclear whether differences in emotional stimulus content are able to modulate visual cortex activation during imagery. Moreover, individual differences in emotional reactivity and imagery ability have not been investigated. The aim of this experiment was to examine these processes by means of near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). Thirty-five healthy adults were instructed to look at affective (disgust and happy) and neutral pictures and afterwards visualize them during multi-channel NIRS recording. Our main results indicated a differential involvement of parietal and occipital areas in the perception and imagery of affective pictures. In general, picture perception provoked increased oxygenated hemoglobin in occipital regions, whereas imagery was associated with an increase in parietal areas. Emotional content modulated activation of the left occipital cortex during both picture perception and imagery. Affective pictures (disgust and happy) provoked greater activation compared to neutral ones. Additionally, the self-rated imagery ability of the participants was positively correlated with their occipital activation during affective imagery. Thus, occipital activation might be crucial for the quality of imagery. In contrast, all correlations with emotional traits (e.g. trait disgust) and oxygenation were nonsignificant, which might be due to the fact that those personality factors predominantly modulate the activation of subcortical limbic structures which are not accessible with NIRS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.03.006

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Humans do not necessarily require physical reward cues; vivid imagery about the reward may be enough to trigger limbic brain activations of incentive salience in people that would require cues in animals.

    “Humans don’t necessarily require physical reward cues – vivid imagery about the reward may be enough to trigger limbic brain activations of incentive salience in people that would require cues in animals (May et al., 2004; Kochel et al., 2011; Jauregui-Lobera et al., 2012; Miyapuram et al., 2012).”

    From Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation (2018) · cites this paper as Kochel et al., 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Köchel, A., Plichta, M. M., Schäfer, A., Leutgeb, V., Scharmüller, W., Fallgatter, A. J., & Schienle, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Graz (AT)
  • Central Institute of Mental Health (DE)
  • University of Tübingen (DE)
Corresponding author
Köchel, Angelika
Venue
International Journal of Psychophysiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-06
Volume
80
Issue
3
Pages
192-197
ISSN
0167-8760 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2024844166
Cited by
37
References
42
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
affective imagery, visual cortex activation, occipital cortex, parietal cortex, emotional reactivity, emotional valence, oxyhemoglobin, near-infrared spectroscopy
MeSH terms
Carbamide Peroxide, Adult, Affect, Emotions, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Limbic System, Male, Peroxides, Photic Stimulation, Urea, Visual Cortex, Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review