Electrophysiological indices of error monitoring in juvenile and adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)—A meta-analytic appraisal
Abstract
Attempts to identify the central disturbed processes explaining the overt symptoms of juvenile and adult ADHD rely heavily on the concept of deficient error monitoring processes. A number of studies have investigated event-related potentials (ERPs) and behavioral performance in tasks traditionally used to probe the interference control and inhibition of motor responses. The inspection of the error negativity (Ne/ERN) and error positivity (Pe) components evoked in these tasks has produced conflicting results with respect to the nature and extent of an error monitoring deficit in ADHD. A meta-analytic aggregation of these single studies should help develop a reliable appraisal of the evidence for the compromised performance monitoring processes in ADHD. Our meta-analysis was confined to studies of adult and juvenile ADHD participants examined in GoNogo and Flanker task studies that also reported the Ne/ERN and Pe ERP components. Only seven studies were suited for the meta-analysis, but their aggregation nevertheless led to clear results: Ne was attenuated in adult and adolescent ADHD participants for both tasks, and Pe was attenuated only in the GoNogo tasks. The ADHD participants made more errors than the controls in both tasks but responded slower only in the Flanker task. To our knowledge, this meta-analysis is the first to compare electrophysiological and behavioral indices of error monitoring in adult and juvenile ADHD patients and healthy controls. Admittedly, the data av…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reduced ERN and Pe amplitudes have been found in studies of children and adults with ADHD using choice reaction time tasks.
“Reduced ERN and Pe amplitudes have been found in studies of children and adults with ADHD using choice reaction time tasks, suggesting the ERN and Pe may serve as biomarkers for the disorder (Bellato et al. 2021; Figuracion et al. 2024; Geburek et al. 2013; Kaiser et al. 2020; Liu et al. 2020; Lutz et al. 2021).”
From Reaction Time Variability and Electrophysiological Indices of Performance Monitoring in Youths With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (2026) · cites this paper as Geburek et al. 2013
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 87 · Cited by 71
- Authors
- Geburek, A. J., Rist, F., Gediga, G., Stroux, D., & Pedersen, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Münster (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Geburek, A.J.
- ORCID
- Pedersen, A.
- Venue
- International Journal of Psychophysiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-03
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 349-362
- ISSN
- 0167-8760 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1986361448
- Cited by
- 71
- References
- 87
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5
- FWCI
- 2.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
- Keywords
- attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, error monitoring, error-related negativity, error positivity, event-related potentials, go/no-go task, flanker task, interference control, performance monitoring, adult ADHD
- MeSH terms
- Aging, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Male, Monitoring, Physiologic, Neuropsychological Tests
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review