Cited by 55Refrigeration and Air Conditioning TechnologiesAdsorption and Cooling SystemsHeat Transfer and Optimization

Modelling and experimental validation of the hot-gas defrost process of an air-cooled evaporator

Dopazo, J. Alberto, Fernandez-Seara, José, Uhía, Francisco J., Diz, Rubén·2010·International Journal of Refrigeration

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2009.12.027

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dopazo, J. A., Fernandez-Seara, J., Uhía, F. J., & Diz, R.
Affiliations
Universidade de Vigo (ES)
Venue
International Journal of Refrigeration
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-06
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
829-839
ISSN
0140-7007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2078350033
Cited by
55
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Refrigeration (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Adsorption and Cooling Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer and Optimization
Keywords
frost melting, refrigerant properties, model validation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review