The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring KMS success: A respecification of the DeLone and McLean's model
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · Cited by 41,941
The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update
(2003) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748 · Cited by 11,791
Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.3.1.60 · Cited by 10,697
Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis
Rai, A., Lang, S. S., & Welker, R. B. (2002) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.13.1.50.96 · Cited by 1,611
Cited by
Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study
Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa'deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004 · Cited by 1,350
Organizational impact of system quality, information quality, and service quality
Gorla, N., Somers, T. M., & Wong, B. (2010) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2010.05.001 · Cited by 965
Understanding the impact of m-banking on individual performance: DeLone & McLean and TTF perspective
Tam, C., & Oliveira, T. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.016 · Cited by 383
Chung, N., Lee, H., Lee, S. J., & Koo, C. (2015) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.03.004 · Cited by 232
Wang, Y., Asaad, Y., & Filieri, R. (2020) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/0047287519855135 · Cited by 194
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, J.-H., & Wang, Y.-M.
- Venue
- Information & Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-09
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 728-739
- ISSN
- 0378-7206 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2163050413
- Cited by
- 770
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 68.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring KMS success: A respecification of the DeLone and McLean's model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.im.2006.05.002
- The paper
- Wu, J.-H., & Wang, Y.-M. (2006). Measuring KMS success: A respecification of the DeLone and McLean's model. Information & Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.05.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
